Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

amborin

(16,631 posts)
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 12:33 PM Apr 2016

Greenpeace Response to HRC: She Conflates Greenpeace w/ Sanders Campaign

Greenpeace Responds to Hillary Clinton Statement on Exchange With Activist Over Fossil Fuel Money

WASHINGTON - Following the release of a video showing Secretary Hillary Clinton losing her patience with Greenpeace activist Eva Resnick-Day, the Clinton campaign released a statement saying that the campaign “has not taken a dollar from oil and gas industry PACs or corporations. The simple fact is that the Sanders campaign is misleading voters with their attacks.”

In response to Secretary Clinton’s statement, Greenpeace Democracy Campaign Director Molly Dorozenski issued the following response:

“Secretary Clinton cannot ignore the voices of activists asking her to reject fossil fuel money, or explain away the more than one million dollars she takes from fossil fuel lobbyists. We would welcome a statement from Clinton saying that she plans to stop taking this money going forward to prove to young people like Eva that she’s listening to them, not her biggest donors.”

“Secretary Clinton is conflating Greenpeace with the Sanders campaign, but we are an independent organization, and our research team has assessed the contributions to all Presidential candidates. We have not and will not endorse candidates. Earlier this year, we asked both Secretary Clinton and Senator Sanders to sign our pledge to #fixdemocracy, and while Sanders signed, Clinton did not. We intend to continue to challenge all candidates to listen to the people, not their biggest donors.”


To read a direct response from Eva Resnick-Day to Hillary Clinton, please click here:

http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/im-the-greenpeace-activist-who-asked-hillary-clinton-to-pledge-to-reject-fossil-fuel-contributions-at-the-purchase-ny-campaign-rally/

Greenpeace has documented Hillary Clinton’s fossil fuel contributions here: http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/campaign-updates/hillary-clintons-connection-oil-gas-industry/

To watch the video of today’s exchange with Secretary Clinton, click here:
&feature=youtu.be
###


http://www.commondreams.org/newswire/2016/03/31/greenpeace-responds-hillary-clinton-statement-exchange-activist-over-fossil-fuel
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Greenpeace Response to HRC: She Conflates Greenpeace w/ Sanders Campaign (Original Post) amborin Apr 2016 OP
Wow. That video. As an active member of the environmental movement, this is very troubling. CentralCoaster Apr 2016 #1
you, me, and many hundreds of thousands, if not many millions, of environmentalists, if amborin Apr 2016 #7
O'Malley took the same pledge at the time, only Clinton declined. Jefferson23 Apr 2016 #2
The Hillary campaign does not understand that INdemo Apr 2016 #3
The internet is very unfair to Hillary FlatBaroque Apr 2016 #11
like how she GRINNED when she was going "never! ever!" for a healthcare system even China tries to MisterP Apr 2016 #12
Hillary is simply trying to paint Bernie as a provocateur. SHe had no basis to invoke his name. morningfog Apr 2016 #4
I wonder how much this will affect her campaign, if at all. KPN Apr 2016 #5
Well tough and direct works for Trump. dogman Apr 2016 #9
this wasn't tough and direct; it was over the top, vicious; her defenses are crumbling; she hates amborin Apr 2016 #22
her response seemed destabilized, moreso than tough and direct; her level of anger was unjustified amborin Apr 2016 #10
I'm inclined to agree. KPN Apr 2016 #15
When the video is slowed or even stopped it shows Ichingcarpenter Apr 2016 #16
She has accepted too much from the oil industry to turn back now. If she gets elected she will rhett o rick Apr 2016 #6
Yeah, it's never good when you can't identify your opponents (nt) Babel_17 Apr 2016 #8
Her assumption is telling. SHRED Apr 2016 #13
Corporate media conglomerate coverage that I have seen so far doesn't make this distinction. Uncle Joe Apr 2016 #14
Perfect timing for Greenpeace to step in felix_numinous Apr 2016 #17
" ... movements would not have a voice ..." No, but they would be on the receiving end of her ... Impedimentus Apr 2016 #19
It is the tone of truth felix_numinous Apr 2016 #20
I am so sick, so sick ... Impedimentus Apr 2016 #18
Shows just how out of touch she and the Democratic Party are. Environmentalism used to be liberal_at_heart Apr 2016 #21
 

CentralCoaster

(1,163 posts)
1. Wow. That video. As an active member of the environmental movement, this is very troubling.
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 12:39 PM
Apr 2016

It makes me very sad.

amborin

(16,631 posts)
7. you, me, and many hundreds of thousands, if not many millions, of environmentalists, if
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 12:50 PM
Apr 2016

they see her response

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
2. O'Malley took the same pledge at the time, only Clinton declined.
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 12:42 PM
Apr 2016

People are going to vote for this..really? ugh

INdemo

(6,994 posts)
3. The Hillary campaign does not understand that
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 12:43 PM
Apr 2016

this rude comment,this lie she just spoke will come back to haunt her.
Waht Hillary doesnt understand is that all over the internet there is proof in her previous actions and comments that will prove she did/she is take/taking money form large Oil and Gas corporations.

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
12. like how she GRINNED when she was going "never! ever!" for a healthcare system even China tries to
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 12:53 PM
Apr 2016

have: she's not even thinking about her millions from the bloodsuckers, just her expected GLEE at seeing someone else lose

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
4. Hillary is simply trying to paint Bernie as a provocateur. SHe had no basis to invoke his name.
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 12:45 PM
Apr 2016

Same with her calling the "SHe wins we lose" chanters "Bernie people."

It's intentional on her part. Although she should keep her anger in check.

KPN

(15,646 posts)
5. I wonder how much this will affect her campaign, if at all.
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 12:48 PM
Apr 2016

From the video, she does seem to be over-reactive. Is she losing it or is this the persona she wants to project -- tough and direct?

dogman

(6,073 posts)
9. Well tough and direct works for Trump.
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 12:51 PM
Apr 2016

Some perceive bullying as strength. Are her supporters as gullible as Trump's?

amborin

(16,631 posts)
22. this wasn't tough and direct; it was over the top, vicious; her defenses are crumbling; she hates
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 04:54 PM
Apr 2016

confronting the truth and reacts with rage at anyone who dares challenge her cronyism and prevarications

amborin

(16,631 posts)
10. her response seemed destabilized, moreso than tough and direct; her level of anger was unjustified
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 12:51 PM
Apr 2016

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
16. When the video is slowed or even stopped it shows
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 01:25 PM
Apr 2016

some very unflattering screen shots of hillary's anger

and finger pointing attack six times in the girl's face.

Believe me........this is gonna create parodies, jokes, criticisms, commentaries, memes on the internet that she will regret for her outburst

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
6. She has accepted too much from the oil industry to turn back now. If she gets elected she will
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 12:49 PM
Apr 2016

be happy to help the Republicons destroy our environment for wealth.

From the OP:

“Secretary Clinton is conflating Greenpeace with the Sanders campaign, but we are an independent organization, and our research team has assessed the contributions to all Presidential candidates. We have not and will not endorse candidates. Earlier this year, we asked both Secretary Clinton and Senator Sanders to sign our pledge to #fixdemocracy, and while Sanders signed, Clinton did not. We intend to continue to challenge all candidates to listen to the people, not their biggest donors.”

 

SHRED

(28,136 posts)
13. Her assumption is telling.
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 12:57 PM
Apr 2016

We'll see how using an environmental group to lash out at Bernie supporters works out for her.

A classic case of foot-in-mouth disease.

Uncle Joe

(58,366 posts)
14. Corporate media conglomerate coverage that I have seen so far doesn't make this distinction.
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 01:00 PM
Apr 2016

They have been light on the substance, about Bernie signing the pledge and Hillary not, that this was a challenge to all the Democratic Candidates including Martin O'Malley; he signed as well.

Thanks for the thread, amborin.

felix_numinous

(5,198 posts)
17. Perfect timing for Greenpeace to step in
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 02:53 PM
Apr 2016

HRC needs to be exposed for who and what she truly represents. Everyone who is not her base, environmentalists, occupy Wall Street, peace movements would not have a voice.

Impedimentus

(898 posts)
19. " ... movements would not have a voice ..." No, but they would be on the receiving end of her ...
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 03:05 PM
Apr 2016

screaming voice.

FEEL THE BERN - 2016

Impedimentus

(898 posts)
18. I am so sick, so sick ...
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 03:03 PM
Apr 2016

Appears Hillary has a bad case of fossilittis. Let's all send her a Get Well card - it's the sympathetic thing to do.

FEEL THE BERN - 2016

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
21. Shows just how out of touch she and the Democratic Party are. Environmentalism used to be
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 03:21 PM
Apr 2016

a Democratic value. But environmentalism doesn't pay the bills does it Hillary?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Greenpeace Response to HR...