2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumPost removed
dana_b
(11,546 posts)so glad that's not allowed here.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)If we go with "someone on the internet said" it's been nasty.
The Internet has segments of every sector of society and every thought you can imagine.
To be clear, fuck these assholes.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Fairgo
(1,571 posts)I wonder what kind of self absorbed closet anti-semite would be so ignorant as to accidentally out themselves like that?
Vattel
(9,289 posts)And for that sort of racist remark, I won't apologize for calling out someone.
She did?
SMH. Wow.
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)Sorry, I see: name same. But definitely?
MelissaB
(16,420 posts)Response to Post removed (Original post)
Raster This message was self-deleted by its author.
ebayfool
(3,411 posts)PatrickforO
(14,585 posts)from about 1800 on. One of the favorite tactics of the capitalist owned establishment is to plant a provocateur and have them incite some sort of violence or divisive rhetoric that leads to violence. If that is successful, they can send cops in with truncheons to run blood in the gutters while all the time still sucking our treasury dry and moving us toward wage slavery.
That's what this is, people. Nothing more, nothing less.
LET THIS FALSE MEME SINK INTO THE OBLIVION IT DESERVES.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)In_The_Wind
(72,300 posts)Last edited Sat Mar 19, 2016, 09:17 PM - Edit history (1)
8:26 PM
Automated Message
AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
Mail Message
On Sat Mar 19, 2016, 08:16 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
Anti-semitic online comments about Sanders and his supporters
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511533739
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Posting disruptive meta a second time after it was locked by the hosts here:http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511533345
JURY RESULTS
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Mar 19, 2016, 08:26 PM, and the Jury voted 6-1 to HIDE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No need to drag every piece of internet trash into DU
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Wasn't one locked thread enough for you? Guess not! I do hope this thread gets hidden.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I agree with the alerter. This post is nothing more than flamebait. We should be better than this.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Totally starting a riot, people have been banned from DU for less .
kath
(10,565 posts)GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)thereismore
(13,326 posts)I don't care about "calling out" rules of DU, she needs to explain this. She wrote this vile comment, and she needs to explain.