Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Cal33

(7,018 posts)
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 09:39 AM Mar 2016

It's general knowledge that the Southern States would be almost all voting for Hillary. She

did win big. In the coming two weeks there are 5 more Southern States: Kentucky, Louisiana,
Mississippi, North Carolina and Florida. Hillary will be winning big in the first three, but it might
be close in NC and FL.

From then on, I'd expect Bernie to be gradually catching up -- right into June! I don't know
about the others, but I still expect Bernie to be the winner.

MNSNBC and CNN never pointed out this fact, that the Southern States are the early voting
ones. And the results could influence the mood and even votes of people in the later-voting states.
Well, it's pretty clear that they are for the Establishment.

The reality is that the fight is continuing to go on strong - right into June!

24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It's general knowledge that the Southern States would be almost all voting for Hillary. She (Original Post) Cal33 Mar 2016 OP
He Could And Will Win As Long As We Keep On Funding.... global1 Mar 2016 #1
Money is meaningless at this point. She has the momentum. JaneyVee Mar 2016 #4
Yes US and Bernie will win this one madokie Mar 2016 #8
Yes, funding Bernie is important. Our donations may be small, but our numbers are Cal33 Mar 2016 #14
NC and FL arent even close as of now. JaneyVee Mar 2016 #2
Sooner or later Sanders will need to capture a state with Blue_Tires Mar 2016 #3
Don't forget Michigan next. Adrahil Mar 2016 #5
The math is bad for Bernie... SidDithers Mar 2016 #6
They are practically irrelevant as GOP will likely win these states in GE leveymg Mar 2016 #7
Right, so we could turn our attention to states that ARE going to be competitive in the GE. auntpurl Mar 2016 #9
Link to head to head polls in those states, please. leveymg Mar 2016 #10
Coming right up auntpurl Mar 2016 #12
I meant head to head Clinton-Trump. These polls are Clinton-Sanders leveymg Mar 2016 #19
No, of course not. auntpurl Mar 2016 #20
HRC polls way lower than Bernie among Independents, who are the dominant voting bloc nationwide. leveymg Mar 2016 #23
One big problem is that in many states Independents cannot take part in the primaries. So Cal33 Mar 2016 #24
So, I posted your links. auntpurl Mar 2016 #18
Is Massachusetts irrelevant? yardwork Mar 2016 #15
I don't think the GOP will be very strong this time around. I've read that (see JaneyVee's link Cal33 Mar 2016 #21
I cast my primary vote for Bernie yesterday Blue_Adept Mar 2016 #11
Another south bashing thread. yardwork Mar 2016 #13
I never said that ALL the early voting states were from the South. I do believe that Cal33 Mar 2016 #16
The fly in the ointment DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #17
Time has always been on the side of the relative unknown. Sorta. Orsino Mar 2016 #22

global1

(25,251 posts)
1. He Could And Will Win As Long As We Keep On Funding....
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 09:57 AM
Mar 2016

his effort. TPTB thought that Super Tuesday would be the knockout blow to take Bernie out of the race. The fact that Bernie has created a 'Political Revolution' by funding his efforts without a Super PAC and going right to The People is what will carry him to the WH.

Rachel has missed that point in that she equates Bernie's revolution only with turnout. The fact is that Bernie's revolution is how he is raising his campaign money from you and me.

Hillary is in trouble money wise taking this race all the way to the convention. She has maxed out her big donors and money is becoming a problem for her. That is why we're hearing now that she will be pandering to the NRA lobbyists and the Bankster's.

Don't be demoralized you Bernie supporters. We're in a better position than Hillary is right now. The MSM is going to try and tell us just the contrary. Don't believe them. Just keep those $27.00 donations flowing to Bernie and we will win this. Let's make Bernie's month of March donations beat the February numbers.

Go Bernie!!!

Feel the Bern!!!!

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
4. Money is meaningless at this point. She has the momentum.
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 10:03 AM
Mar 2016

She literally doesnt need to spend a dollar in these states except Michigan.



And shes up big in Florida.

 

Cal33

(7,018 posts)
14. Yes, funding Bernie is important. Our donations may be small, but our numbers are
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 10:40 AM
Mar 2016

large. And this large number is the equalizer.

Last night I was rather surprised that Bernie won in Oklahoma. I thought OK would
be for Hillary. It was a pleasant surprise.

After the middle of March there will be no more Southern States. Well, DC will be
one of the last to vote. And DC has a heavy black population, most of whom still
think that the Clintons are the ones who will be doing the most for black people.
Bernie should concentrate on working harder there, and let the people know better
who he is, and what he really stands for. Just tell them the truth.

I must say that the tremendous efforts of people like the DNC's Debbie W. Schulz
to keep Bernie Sanders from being seen and heard by the American public over the
past year has been paying off big dividends for the Establishment. But this unfair
advantage has been getting smaller and smaller by the day, and soon will no longer
be of any further help to them. Republican-lites fight just as dirty as their masters -
the Republicans.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
2. NC and FL arent even close as of now.
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 10:00 AM
Mar 2016

Neither are the other coming southern states. Math not looking good for Team Bern.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
3. Sooner or later Sanders will need to capture a state with
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 10:00 AM
Mar 2016

a sizable minority population, and I don't see that happening...

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
5. Don't forget Michigan next.
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 10:04 AM
Mar 2016

Clinton is heavily favored there atm.

She is also heavily favored in NC and FL, though let's see what happens this week.

SidDithers

(44,228 posts)
6. The math is bad for Bernie...
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 10:09 AM
Mar 2016

He's down by 194 delegates right now, with 128 delegates still to be awarded from last night (including 52 in Texas). Clinton's lead will increase once those delegates are portioned out.

So, even conservatively, lets say that Clinton has a 200 delegate lead, with 1021 of the 4051 pledged delegates awarded.

That means, of the remaining 3030 delegates available, Sanders has to win 56.6% of them to win the majority of pledged delegates.

And there are still large delegate states that are going to go Clinton's way, meaning that Sanders will have to win an even larger percentage in the states that he does win.

Sid

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
7. They are practically irrelevant as GOP will likely win these states in GE
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 10:20 AM
Mar 2016

Not a lot to cheer about for Hillary really. Dem turnout is severely depressed. Trump appears to have added to the Republican numbers. We are in big trouble if she ends upb the candidate.

auntpurl

(4,311 posts)
9. Right, so we could turn our attention to states that ARE going to be competitive in the GE.
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 10:26 AM
Mar 2016

Like Virginia.

PA, OH, FL - Hillary has substantial leads in the polls in all of them. Of course, polls can change - but as the OP mentions, this has pretty much gone as expected so far.

auntpurl

(4,311 posts)
20. No, of course not.
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:12 PM
Mar 2016

There is only national polling data available so far, as far as I know. In which Hillary is thrashing Trump. (as is Bernie)

But that's not really the point, is it? The point is, in order to win swing states, we should probably nominate the candidate that swing states want to vote for. Of course primary results aren't an exact analogy to GE results, but we should be giving ourselves the very best chance to win, shouldn't we?

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
23. HRC polls way lower than Bernie among Independents, who are the dominant voting bloc nationwide.
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 01:12 PM
Mar 2016

So, obviously, Bernie is the pick, if you really want to win.

Hillary's negatives among Independents go back at least 8 years, and are only getting stronger over time.

 

Cal33

(7,018 posts)
24. One big problem is that in many states Independents cannot take part in the primaries. So
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 01:20 PM
Mar 2016

they can't help Bernie in those states. Some might switch to the Dem. Party, but not many
will do that.

This also at least partially explains why national polls always show Bernie beating the
Republican front runners in hypothetical GE polls, and Hillary always losing to them, except
for the latest one, in which she beat Trump, but lost to Cruz and Rubio.

The Independents! (And they are the largest group)!

 

Cal33

(7,018 posts)
21. I don't think the GOP will be very strong this time around. I've read that (see JaneyVee's link
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:29 PM
Mar 2016

below) 48% of Republicans will not vote for Trump, if he should win the nomination. The
Republican Establishment is so much against him. And it looks like he will be the nominee
at this point. Of course there are Sanders supporters who will not vote for Clinton also, but
I don't think the figure comes anywhere near 48%.

I find the following really strange: All the national polls comparing Sanders to Republican
front runners since many months ago show that Sanders beats ALL of them in hypothetical
elections - and by large margins. Those polls comparing Clinton to Republican front runners
show her losing. Only the latest one shows her winning against Trump, but losing to Cruz
and Rubio. My guess is that the DNC is supporting Clinton, but the majority of the population
does not.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/01/politics/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders-poll/

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511379528

Blue_Adept

(6,399 posts)
11. I cast my primary vote for Bernie yesterday
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 10:32 AM
Mar 2016

But I'm also aware of the math and don't see any path to the nomination for him at all based on what's happened so far and the tracking/stats going forward.

yardwork

(61,622 posts)
13. Another south bashing thread.
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 10:39 AM
Mar 2016

NC will not be close.

And it's news to me that Iowa, New Hampshire, and Nevada are southern states. Those were the "early primaries."

 

Cal33

(7,018 posts)
16. I never said that ALL the early voting states were from the South. I do believe that
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 10:54 AM
Mar 2016

most of the Southern States will have voted before the end of this month, after which
Bernie will be catching up.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
17. The fly in the ointment
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 10:59 AM
Mar 2016

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
22. Time has always been on the side of the relative unknown. Sorta.
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 12:36 PM
Mar 2016

Exposure to the better message is how that message spreads and changes minds.

The Clinton campaign wins by default, and eight months has hardly been time enough for even the best message and most brilliant campaigning to crush the well-known brand.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»It's general knowledge th...