2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumI feel the Bern.
Last summer, my 16-year-old daughter asked me whether I felt the Bern. Did you leave the stove on again? I asked her.
Now, after listening to We, the People, I feel the Bern.
I hereby endorse Bernie Sanders to be our Democratic nominee for President of the United States. I will vote for him as a Super-delegate at the Democratic National Convention. And I enthusiastically join, shoulder to shoulder, his political revolution.
Join our political revolution by chipping in $27, Bernies average contribution, right here and right now >>
Perhaps inspired by the Bernie Sanders message of Not me. Us., for the past several days, I have appealed to Democrats across the nation to tell me for whom I should vote, as a Super-delegate at the Democratic National Convention. The response has been absolutely overwhelming. Almost 400,000 Democrats voted at GraysonPrimary.com. More than the number who voted in the South Carolina primary. More than the number who voted in the New Hampshire primary and the Nevada caucus combined.
The results: Sanders 86%, Clinton 14%. More than just a landslide. An earthquake.
We invited not just votes, but also comments. I have been fascinated by the reasons you all gave for your votes. Well be sharing some of those, in coming days. But in Bernies case, it boils down to this:
America needs a revolution. And only Bernie Sanders, as President of the United States, can make one.
For those of you who read these missives (and if you dont, then welcome!) this endorsement may not be entirely unexpected. You know that:
(1) I have passed 54 amendments on the Floor of the House in the last three years, more than any other Member. And when Bernie Sanders served in the House, in his time Bernie was the Amendment King, getting so many good things done in a hopelessly waterlogged institution, again and again.
(2) I am the only Member of the U.S. House of Representatives who raised most of his campaign funds from small contributions of less than $200 (in both 2012 and 2014, by the way). Bernie Sanders is the only Member of the U.S. Senate who raised most of his campaign funds from small contributions of less than $200. And this year, Bernie Sanders is the only Presidential candidate who has raised most of his campaign funds from small contributions of less than $200. Bernie and I are not owned and beholden to the billionaires and the multinational corporations and the lobbyists and the special interests.
Bernie Sanders is unbought and unbossed. So am I. That is an essential element of the political revolution. Contribute $27 today, to demonstrate that a candidate doesnt have to sell his soul to pay for a winning campaign.
Bernie Sanders and I share a goal of building a grassroots movement of people who want to take back our country from the billionaires and the multinational corporations. We want to make elections into about something different: Not the lesser of two evils, but the greater good.
When you make a contribution to our campaign, our revolution, you are demonstrating that our democracy is no longer for sale to the highest bidder. But Bernie and I cannot accomplish this on our own. We need your help. We need to declare our Declaration of Independence from the baneful power of Big Money, by coming together one and all.
This is the revolution youve been waiting for. The place is here, and the time is now. Chip in $27 to help Bernie and me take back our country from the Big Money, and defeat the oligarchy >>
Power
to The People.
Courage,
Rep. Alan Grayson
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)TDale313
(7,820 posts)We don't like the rigged system.
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)can they not help themselves???? More and more I feel Bernie Bros is a David Brock creation...
Buddyblazon
(3,014 posts)Brockbros.
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)screen name but BrockBuddies might be a better fit
Buddyblazon
(3,014 posts)I like it.
We need to make that viral.
djean111
(14,255 posts)That's s an odd assumption I have been noticing - that some people think that liberals and Progressives (and Democratic Socialists ) automatically hate people with money. That's wrong, and very short-sighted.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Hating unfortunately is not tied to net worth. And yes, I knew Grayson has means.
Jemmons
(711 posts)of their wealth.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)dchill
(38,489 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)Is that a complaint? or what does that indicate?
Bryant
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Other post the 1% does not care about others, or why do we need the 1%.
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)Or do you think that most of the members of that select group are more interested in protecting their position and in acquiring more wealth? Hillary may be an exception to this; I think she identifies with Wall Street to a great extent, but that doesn't preclude her from also wanting to help those Americans who aren't in the 1%.
Bryant
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Caring is not class related, just as hate doesn't know class.
marions ghost
(19,841 posts)actually. Nobody is worth that much to society or to themselves. From the Kochs to Bill Gates to Oprah. Nobody. The 1% have way too much power.
Tax the rich.
creatives4innovation
(98 posts)Their income is far higher than the top 1%: Clintons Income May Reach Top 1% of the 1%
Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)that they have used to buy influence. Over $100,000,000 for speeches could buy a lot of influence, and that is just what she and Bill received personally. Add in campaign contributions, Super PAC money and the Clinton Global Inititative and you see how desperate they are to have her in the Presidency.
Paper Roses
(7,473 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Some groups.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)I suppose I could follow YOUR example and say 'Hillary Supporters Love Wall St Corruption' but I'm smarter than that and would never broad brush any group of Americans by sinking to that level of personal attack on millions of Americans.
IF you are happy with our candidates being funded by the same people who collapsed the World Economy, not just ours and destroyed the lives of millions of people, maybe you're not aware of how many lives WERE desroyed, then that's your business.
But the reason why an unknown Senator from Vt has resonated with the people who have been lucky enough to HEAR his message so far, is because THEY do not want Wall St criminals influencing our government.
Mbrow
(1,090 posts)R B Garr
(16,951 posts)and his latest ad which is airing all over. So he does malign all rich people.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)approved of the message of OWS, they completely understand what is meant by the 1%. So not a problem if YOU don't. We do, we the people, and that is why he is going to win this election.
R B Garr
(16,951 posts)of your message, which is that you speak for "a majority of Americans".
Bernie himself maligns rich people who he clumps together as the "1%ers". So that statement you responded to was accurate. Rich people are targeted as the enemy. But if you like the rich people, like Adam McKay from the Oscars yesterday who is worth $40 Million, then his richness is okay. But Bernie himself makes no distinction and just maligns 1%ers.
This kind of simplistic targeting of people is probably not going to work for him on a national level.
fbc
(1,668 posts)after they have visited the guillotine.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)the middle class and poor people. We don't like selfish rich people who only think about their own interests. We also don't like other selfish people who think only of their own interests and never of the interests of our whole society and all of us and finding a compromise that works for everyone.
So it isn't about rich people v. poor people. It is about the selfish (many but not by any means all of whom are rich) and those who can find a good middle ground between supporting their own interests and those of others.
A poor person who steals and will kill for money is no better than a rich person who does it though the rich person may hire others to actually get their hands bloody.
The poor person who steals and kills (such as through chemical spills, etc.) will probably go to jail. In our current system, the rich person usually goes free.
Duval
(4,280 posts)Duval
(4,280 posts)That's hilariously untrue.
TDale313
(7,820 posts)You've been a strong voice for the people for a very long time.
djean111
(14,255 posts)Easy decision. I would rather live with Grayson's votes and legislation than Murphy's. I don't have to literally live with either one.
I know it can be argued that Grayson's mailing list is most certainly not likely to have a lot of Hillary supporters on it, but still an interesting result.
demwing
(16,916 posts)The revolution may not be televised, but it will be joined. Welcome to the revolution (but from what I know about you, my guess is that you've always been on the front line)!
disillusioned73
(2,872 posts)"The results: Sanders 86%, Clinton 14%. More than just a landslide. An earthquake."
- Good on you Mr. Grayson..
It looks like the corporate media has called this race WAAAAAAAY too early my friends..
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)The first link leads directly to Grayson's campaign site, not Bernie's! Grayson is using DU as a funding base -- again, and being deceitful about it.
ETA: This is NOT Alan Grayson, it's one of his campaign workers.
Autumn
(45,072 posts)I'll kick a few bucks to any politician who endorses Bernie. Politicians fund raise that's the nature of the beast. It's all good Taz
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)I make no secret I think Grayson is a sleazebag and this is a prime example. A politician has to have integrity for me to support him/her. No passes.
Autumn
(45,072 posts)demmiblue
(36,846 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Grayson to that list.
BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)One is honest, the other corrupt.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)djean111
(14,255 posts)I will happily kick in a few bucks, and will be voting for him, too!
We have to try and get more liberals into Congress, and this is a good chance.
BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)Further confirmation that Alan Grayson is a corrupt scumbag.
Omaha Steve
(99,624 posts)I posted it in LBN: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10141363193
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)I hope no one falls for this.
Autumn
(45,072 posts)Democrats and Left Leaning Independents are no longer playing their rigged game and they are on notice. No more business as usual, that will not work. It's the peoples business and they better damn well remember that.
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Spazito
(50,331 posts)FrostyAusty
(57 posts)A Hillary supporter making snide remarks about morality and character.. Really?
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)When we insult one another it reflects poorly on our community, and us as individuals.
Amazing.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Because you said it all right here.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)obamanut2012
(26,071 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)for people looking to hold powerful positions in our government is 'how many war criminals do they call 'friend and/or mentor'. To my knowledge the Bush family are not among his friends either.
I know it's a low standard we have set these days wrt to our 'leaders'. But there is a level of 'moral character' that even those willing to lower the bar in order to 'win' should not be willing to ignore, and War criminals I would think would be the last straw as it were.
Using that as a standard if nothing else, yes, he is a person of moral standards and I am glad that the candidate he has endorsed doesn't count any War Criminals among his friends or mentors either.
Response to sabrina 1 (Reply #81)
DemocratSinceBirth This message was self-deleted by its author.
ismnotwasm
(41,977 posts)Response to Alan Grayson (Original post)
PonyUp This message was self-deleted by its author.
Omaha Steve
(99,624 posts)Duval
(4,280 posts)AzDar
(14,023 posts)retrowire
(10,345 posts)Response to Alan Grayson (Original post)
NCTraveler This message was self-deleted by its author.
Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)Thank you, Mr. Grayson.
Response to Alan Grayson (Original post)
Amimnoch This message was self-deleted by its author.
Iwillnevergiveup
(9,298 posts)is an arrogant fund-raiser who regularly raises eyebrows, even among liberal Dems like myself. I think back to his contentious race with "Taliban Dan." That was clearly over the top, but then I remember his "Republican Health Care" speech, and that was an awesome moment in Congress. His heart is in the right place, and when we consider how many out of touch loonies exist in Florida, he's a welcome antidote, and I support him.
K&R
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)So whatever.
Barack_America
(28,876 posts)Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)and claim they will not vote for HRC in Nov. ??????
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Your post says to me that you do not want VOTERS who you childishly refer to as 'Bernie Bots' to vote for your candidate. Same thing happened in 2008 when Hillary supporters did the exact same thing, name called Obama's supporters, I remember I was one, 'Obama Boys' eg, and we obliged by NOT voting for her.
Fine by me, she's YOUR candidate, not mine and I am fine with you doing again what helped lose her the election in 2008, insulting VOTERS.
creatives4innovation
(98 posts)For endorsing Bernie and blasting the TPP.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)Florida needs a few strong hands to clean up Debbie's mess.
senz
(11,945 posts)With everything you believe in, I didn't think you possibly support anyone but Bernie.
This is the fight of our lives.
iandhr
(6,852 posts)If Clinton wins Florida tomorrow by 20+ points as the polls suggest and you cast a vote for Sanders at the convention you are not listing to we the people.
Duval
(4,280 posts)I also believe this is our big chance and just donated again for you and Bernie. Power...to The People!
brett_jv
(1,245 posts)I.E. Grayson using Bernie's name in this way, referring to US repeatedly?
He's all like 'Give Me, Alan Grayson, some money cause I'm 'with' Bernie, we're fighting the same revolution, together, all arm-in-arm and buddy-buddy ... so giving money to me is just like giving it to Bernie!'
If Bernie knew Grayson was doing this ... I suspect he'd be a little perturbed ... perhaps MORE than 'a little'.
It's not like Grayson is his friggin' running mate or some shit. They're not from the same state, or even House of Congress.
TIME TO PANIC
(1,894 posts)Milliesmom
(493 posts)That way I know he (Bernie ) is getting all the money, I never donate to DNC, they would give it to Hillary.
senz
(11,945 posts)as explained here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1358527
But I haven't had any problems with them, I used them when I donated to President Obama
senz
(11,945 posts)Milliesmom
(493 posts)I still haven't had a problem as I donate every month to Bernie. Not one time have I ever had a problem. I will stay aware.
senz
(11,945 posts)Milliesmom
(493 posts)Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)Superdelegates should always vote for the candidate who won the primary or caucus of their state. You have now boxed yourself in to possibly vote against the will of Florida Democratic voters. That is so foolish and irresponsible, not to mention it will assure a loss in your Senate race, should you get that far.
We do not want an elite group of establishment Democrats, lobbyists and other special interests who are now superdelegates, to decide who will be our candidate. YOU are setting a precedent for that to now happen. If you set the precedent that allows other superdelegates to vote against Bernie, even if he won the primary or caucus of any given state, I will fucking hate your guts for the rest of my life.
I hope Bernie supporters will see how disastrous it would be if superdelegates decide to vote against the will of the people. Please don't buy into this shit sandwich.
Uncle Joe
(58,355 posts)Thanks for endorsing Bernie and the thread, Alan Grayson.