Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

redgreenandblue

(2,088 posts)
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 06:38 PM Feb 2016

PSA: Don't be baited by the bullshit.

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by one_voice (a host of the 2016 Postmortem forum).

It is clear by now that part of the Clinton camp is engaged in a scorched earth campaign that may end up costing us the general in the event that Hillary is the nominee. The core of it is an endless barrage of dishonest smears directed at Bernie supporters.

The pattern is to spread lie after lie after lie after lie about Bernie, and when at some point the angry backlash comes, to whine endlessly about that backlash and to use it as a prompt for smears against supporters of Bernie.

What the people doing such seem to be oblivious to, is the fact that the votes of these very people will be crucial in the general. I don't quite understand the political calculation behind it, but it is what it is.

I would advise anyone, in the event that they observe such a thing on DU, to simply hit the alert button, get the shit hidden, and move on. Don't engage, don't kick the threads. Keep in mind that negative responses are exactly what the people are after.

Thanks for reading.

58 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
PSA: Don't be baited by the bullshit. (Original Post) redgreenandblue Feb 2016 OP
What a crock. Hoyt Feb 2016 #1
It's a pant load alright. CorkySt.Clair Feb 2016 #20
Can you help me? democrank Feb 2016 #30
Exchange "Sanders" for "Clinton" and "Hillary" for "Bernie" and that's DU for the past six months. MohRokTah Feb 2016 #2
Sanders isn't engaging in disgusting Rovian dirty tricks like your candidate Matariki Feb 2016 #5
You obviously haven't been paying attention. MohRokTah Feb 2016 #7
Agreed. nt Cali_Democrat Feb 2016 #8
Then you weren't paying attention in 2008: beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #10
That's nothing compared to the swarms on social media. eomT MohRokTah Feb 2016 #13
We're comparing campaigns, remember? Show me where Bernie did ANYTHING like the Clinton campaign. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #14
IMO, the swarms are driven by direct orders from the Sanders campaign. eom MohRokTah Feb 2016 #15
LMAO! What an absurd conspiracy theory. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #17
ITs an opinion and I'm entitled to it. MohRokTah Feb 2016 #19
Well your opinion just went up against the facts and lost the battle. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #21
Nope, because you have shown me nothing to alter my opinion. MohRokTah Feb 2016 #23
I showed that Hillary ran a dishonest, racist campaign in 2008, where's your evidence? beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #24
And I, as a 2008 Obama supporter., did not see her run a dishonest, racist campaign in 2008. MohRokTah Feb 2016 #26
The articles are right there, everything was documented and it's a matter of record. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #29
Falsehood and innuendo all MohRokTah Feb 2016 #31
And you guys call Bernie supporters true believers? "Hard working...white Americans" beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #35
Post removed Post removed Feb 2016 #37
I didn't write the articles or invent the facts, again it's a matter of record. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #39
Post removed Post removed Feb 2016 #43
Did you read the articles and watch the videos? beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #46
You are a Sanders supporter MohRokTah Feb 2016 #51
So it is denial and wishful thinking, thanks for clearing that up. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #53
Not when you willfully STAY within the bubble nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #56
So by the same logic, who ordered the swarms on me nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #27
Possibly the Sanders campaign. MohRokTah Feb 2016 #28
At least you are consistent nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #32
No thanks MohRokTah Feb 2016 #34
At least you admit that there is a huge logic hole in your thinking nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #38
Nope, my logic is impeccable. MohRokTah Feb 2016 #41
This gets even better, I support no one son nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #45
Based upon the posts of yours I have seen, I do not believe youi. MohRokTah Feb 2016 #49
And I am not a latina either, or born in Mexico City nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #54
And Omaha Steve is "faking" his terminal illness Arazi Feb 2016 #48
Yup., decided to keep it to just myself nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #55
Nailed it...nt SidDithers Feb 2016 #11
Exactly liberal N proud Feb 2016 #40
I'm debating the merits of the ignore function Matariki Feb 2016 #3
Guess you got two bad reviews by the replies artislife Feb 2016 #4
This primary is still tamer than 2008. joshcryer Feb 2016 #6
Thank god for the internet and alternative media farleftlib Feb 2016 #9
ROFL alcibiades_mystery Feb 2016 #12
'Evil' is debatable... 'Liar' is NOT. AzDar Feb 2016 #33
let them just crank to each other. nashville_brook Feb 2016 #16
Plausible explanation: Stopping Bernie is more important than electing Hillary kristopher Feb 2016 #18
Yeah, 'cause the Bernie fans have been so courteous to Clinton and her supporters. Adrahil Feb 2016 #22
Don't forget the alert button nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #25
I was with you until the last paragraph. Blue_In_AK Feb 2016 #36
Post removed Post removed Feb 2016 #42
Lawd nc4bo Feb 2016 #47
Gad this is good nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #50
An example of "dehumanizing", please? tularetom Feb 2016 #52
Dehumanizing is an early step in genocide. No bit of Hillary's narrative is allowed. applegrove Feb 2016 #57
There's self confessed trolls here as well as those spreading FUD Arazi Feb 2016 #44
Locking... one_voice Feb 2016 #58
 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
1. What a crock.
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 06:39 PM
Feb 2016
 

CorkySt.Clair

(1,507 posts)
20. It's a pant load alright.
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 07:32 PM
Feb 2016

democrank

(11,120 posts)
30. Can you help me?
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 08:00 PM
Feb 2016

I`m trying to remember which campaign hired the old rightwing smear merchant David Brock.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
2. Exchange "Sanders" for "Clinton" and "Hillary" for "Bernie" and that's DU for the past six months.
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 06:44 PM
Feb 2016

But then, you knew that

Matariki

(18,775 posts)
5. Sanders isn't engaging in disgusting Rovian dirty tricks like your candidate
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 06:49 PM
Feb 2016

But then, you know that

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
7. You obviously haven't been paying attention.
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 06:51 PM
Feb 2016

The Sanders campaign is the dirtiest I've ever seen.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
8. Agreed. nt
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 06:56 PM
Feb 2016

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
10. Then you weren't paying attention in 2008:
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 07:08 PM
Feb 2016
Clinton aides claim Obama photo wasn't intended as a smear
Ewen MacAskill in Washington
Monday 25 February 2008



Barack Obama, right, is dressed as a Somali elder by Sheikh Mahmed Hassan, left, during his visit to Wajir in northeastern Kenya, near the borders with Somalia and Ethiopia

Barack Obama's campaign team today accused Hillary Clinton's beleaguered staff of mounting a desperate dirty tricks operation by circulating a picture of him in African dress, feeding into false claims on US websites that he is a Muslim.

Obama's campaign manager, David Plouffe, described it as "the most shameful, offensive fear-mongering we've seen from either party in this election". Obama has had to spend much of the campaign stressing he is a Christian not a Muslim and did not study at a madrassa.

Aides for Mrs Clinton, who is fighting a last-ditch battle to keep her hopes of the White House alive, initially tried to brush off the furore, but later denied having anything to do with the distribution of the picture. "I just want to make it very clear that we were not aware of it, the campaign didn't sanction it and don't know anything about it," Clinton spokesman Howard Wolfson told reporters. "None of us have seen the email in question."

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/feb/25/barackobama.hillaryclinton


Obama Trounces Clintons’ Racist, Entitled S.C. Campaign
Posted: January 27, 2008
Matthew Rothschild

The trouncing that Hillary Clinton got in South Carolina proved that the racist and entitled campaign that the Clintons ran there backfired.

The Clinton campaign kept saying, “He’s black, black, black,” as author and South Carolina activist Kevin Alexander Gray pointed out on Jesse Jackson’s “Keep Hope Alive” program Sunday morning. And Bill Clinton used coded language, like the “old okie-dokie,” which served to remind whites of Obama’s blackness, Gray added. That's like saying don’t fall for the old “shuck and jive.”

And speaking of “shuck and jive,” that’s exactly the phrase Andrew Cuomo used to disparage Obama in New Hampshire, saying he can’t use that “shuck and jive” at press conferences.

Obama’s black, get it.

Or Bob Kerrey, another Clinton supporter, saying, “I like the fact that his name is Barack Hussein Obama, and that his father was a Muslim,” and that he went to school in a madrassa, as Bob Herbert noted in The New York Times. Kerrey later apologized, Herbert added, as did Andrew Young, for saying, “Bill is every bit as black as Barack. He’s probably gone with more black women than Barack.”

Or take Bill Clinton's ludicrous comment that Hillary is "stronger than Nelson Mandela." (The not-so-subtle dig being that she's not only stronger than that black man Obama, she's stronger than the strongest black man on the face of the Earth.)

To say nothing of the nonsense about Clinton being the first black President, which Obama was forced to address in the CNN debate, and which Bill Clinton seems to revel in.

(Racist tactics are nothing new for Bill Clinton. After he all, he used the “Sister Souljah” comment to wink at the white base in 1992, and he made a point to hustle back to Arkansas during that campaign just so he could execute a mentally retarded black man named Rickie Ray Rector.)

And sure enough, after the embarrassing loss, the Clinton campaign tried to dismiss the results by stressing the black vote that Obama got and by mentioning that Jesse Jackson had won South Carolina in 1988, as well.

http://progressive.org/news/2008/01/5995/obama-trounces-clintons%E2%80%99-racist-entitled-sc-campaign


Hillary Clinton needs to address the racist undertones of her 2008 campaign
Ryan Cooper
July 23, 2015

McKesson is right to be suspicious. Hillary Clinton's record on race is not great. If she wishes to earn some trust on issues of racial justice, a good place to start would be with the distinctly racist undertones of her 2008 campaign against Barack Obama.

As the first primaries got underway in 2008, and Obama began to slowly pull ahead, the Clinton camp resorted to increasingly blatant race- and Muslim-baiting. It started in February, when Louis Farrakhan, the head of the Nation of Islam, endorsed Obama in a sermon. In a debate a couple days later, moderator Tim Russert repeatedly pressed Obama on the issue, who responded with repeated reassurances that he did not ask for the endorsement, did not accept it, and in fact was not a deranged anti-Semite. That wasn't enough for Clinton, who demanded that Obama "denounce" Farrakhan, which he did.

About the same time, a picture of Obama in traditional Somali garb (from an official trip) then appeared on the Drudge Report, and Matt Drudge claimed he got it from the Clinton campaign. After stonewalling on the origin question, the campaign later claimed it had nothing to do with it. A Clinton flack then went on MSNBC and argued that Obama should not be ashamed to appear in "his native clothing, in the clothing of his country."

Later, a media firestorm blew up when it was discovered that Obama's Chicago pastor Jeremiah Wright once delivered a sermon containing the words "God damn America." In response, Obama gave a deft, nuanced speech on racial issues, but Clinton kept the issue alive by insisting she would have long ago denounced the man.

The late Michael Hastings, who covered Clinton's campaign, described one instance of this strategy on the ground:

[Clinton supporter] Buffenbarger launched into a rant in which he compared Obama to Muhammad Ali, the best-known black American convert to Islam after Malcolm X. "But brothers and sisters," he said, "I've seen Ali in action. He could rope-a-dope with Foreman inside the ring. He could go toe-to-toe with Liston inside the ring. He could get his jaw broken by Norton and keep fighting inside the ring. But Barack Obama is no Muhammad Ali." The cunning racism of the attack actually made my heart start to beat fast and my ears start to ring. For the first time on the campaign trail, I felt completely outraged. I kept thinking, "Am I misreading this?" But there was no way, if you were in that room, to think it was anything other than what it was. [GQ]

Then there was Bill Clinton comparing Obama's campaign to that of Jesse Jackson's unsuccessful run in 1988. The capstone came in May, when Hillary Clinton started openly boasting about her superior support from white voters.

The effort was not so blatant as George H.W. Bush's Willie Horton ad, but the attempt to play on racist attitudes through constant repetition and association was unmistakable — in addition to playing into right-wing conspiracy theories that Obama is a secret Muslim who was born in Africa. It's likely why in West Virginia — a state so racist that some guy in a Texas prison got 40 percent of the Democratic primary vote in 2012 — Clinton won a smashing victory.

http://theweek.com/articles/567774/hillary-clinton-needs-address-racist-undertones-2008-campaign


Obama Skin Tone Darker In Clinton Ad?
Mar 28, 2008 | Updated May 25, 2011

I went and got the original footage from the Clinton ad, and then compared it to 3 different video clips of the same debate from 3 different sources. I did this so as to take into account any editing, or quality issues, that might have accounted for Obama having darker skin in any particular video. None of the 3 video sources I found showed Obama nearly as black as the Hillary ad does. Click the image above to see a larger version. Look at his lips. Look at his eyebrows. Look at how the red MSNBC background has turned more purple. Clearly the image was darkened. The question is "why."

Make the comparison yourself:



http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/obama-skin-tone-darker-in_n_89829.html





 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
13. That's nothing compared to the swarms on social media. eomT
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 07:25 PM
Feb 2016

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
14. We're comparing campaigns, remember? Show me where Bernie did ANYTHING like the Clinton campaign.
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 07:27 PM
Feb 2016

And if you want to compare supporters don't forget one of the biggest reasons PUMAs refused to support and vote for Obama was racism.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
15. IMO, the swarms are driven by direct orders from the Sanders campaign. eom
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 07:28 PM
Feb 2016

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
17. LMAO! What an absurd conspiracy theory.
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 07:30 PM
Feb 2016

Get back to me when you have proof.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
19. ITs an opinion and I'm entitled to it.
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 07:32 PM
Feb 2016

Just like my opinion that there has never been a more dishonest candidate for the Democratic Presidential Nomination that Bernie Sanders and just like every opinion of Hillary Clinton held by Sanders supporters.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
21. Well your opinion just went up against the facts and lost the battle.
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 07:33 PM
Feb 2016

Like I said, get back to me when you have evidence of your theory.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
23. Nope, because you have shown me nothing to alter my opinion.
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 07:50 PM
Feb 2016

Bernie Sanders is the most dishonest candidate in my lifetime.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
24. I showed that Hillary ran a dishonest, racist campaign in 2008, where's your evidence?
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 07:53 PM
Feb 2016

Conspiracy theorists always think their opinion can compete with facts but it just isn't so.

You can claim anything you like but without facts it's just another baseless claim.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
26. And I, as a 2008 Obama supporter., did not see her run a dishonest, racist campaign in 2008.
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 07:56 PM
Feb 2016

Not a single racist statement and no dishonesty.

None at all.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
29. The articles are right there, everything was documented and it's a matter of record.
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 07:58 PM
Feb 2016

Facts don't need you to believe them in order to be true, you can ignore them all you like but they'll still exist.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
31. Falsehood and innuendo all
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 08:00 PM
Feb 2016

Nothing solid and I saw no dishonesty or racism

I was there. I participated. Hillary was completely honest and there wasn't a shred of racism in the campaign.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
35. And you guys call Bernie supporters true believers? "Hard working...white Americans"
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 08:06 PM
Feb 2016


Like I said, ignoring the facts doesn't make them not true.

Denial isn't just a river in Egypt.

Response to beam me up scottie (Reply #35)

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
39. I didn't write the articles or invent the facts, again it's a matter of record.
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 08:10 PM
Feb 2016

Those date back to 2008, do you think Bernie has a time machine and used it to change history?

Response to beam me up scottie (Reply #39)

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
46. Did you read the articles and watch the videos?
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 08:16 PM
Feb 2016

They're all from reputable sources.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
51. You are a Sanders supporter
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 08:18 PM
Feb 2016

I will not even consider anything you present, much less click links, watch videos or read articles you post.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
53. So it is denial and wishful thinking, thanks for clearing that up.
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 08:21 PM
Feb 2016

Enjoy the bubble, reality is harsh.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
56. Not when you willfully STAY within the bubble
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 08:25 PM
Feb 2016
 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
27. So by the same logic, who ordered the swarms on me
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 07:56 PM
Feb 2016

and questioning my life story?

This should be good.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
28. Possibly the Sanders campaign.
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 07:57 PM
Feb 2016

Dirty tricks, you know.

For me personally, I don't know anything about you and quite frankly couldn't care less about your story.

Or you for that matter.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
32. At least you are consistent
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 08:04 PM
Feb 2016

so let's dive fully into this "logic" the Sanders campaign ordered HRC supporters to swarm me and question my life story or wether i am a POC...

Apart of the logic holes here, the first logical question to ask... is why target me? Tell me, exactly what would the Sanders campaign gain by having a bunch of DU'ers, who happen to be HRC supporters do that? If you provide some way out of this logic hole, I will give you points for creativity.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
34. No thanks
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 08:06 PM
Feb 2016

There is nothing that you could ever say or do to alter my opinion. It's set in stone. If you want to beat your head against that stone, that's your business.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
38. At least you admit that there is a huge logic hole in your thinking
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 08:09 PM
Feb 2016

by the way, creative speculation is THAT WAY.

What happened in 2008 is well documented, whether you like it or not, And what is happening this time around, is getting documented, and it is uglier.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
41. Nope, my logic is impeccable.
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 08:11 PM
Feb 2016

You are a Sanders supporter and I long ago figured out just how dishonest that man is, thus I cannot believe anything you have to say about Sanders or his opponent.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
45. This gets even better, I support no one son
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 08:15 PM
Feb 2016

so there you go with your "impeccable logic."

I am an independent voter and who I vote for, is my damn business. We are independent media. but as such I deal with facts. And the fact is that the racism of 2008 is extremely well documented in both the American and BRITISH press, and I am doing my level best, with a bunch of other media, to document what is going on at present. It is not pretty.

So yes, once again tell me why the Sanders campaign order a bunch of HRC supporters on DU to do that? I want your logic here. At the very least give me some facts... or not most likely.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
49. Based upon the posts of yours I have seen, I do not believe youi.
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 08:17 PM
Feb 2016

I believe you are a dyed in the wool Sanders supporter.

Nothing you say will convince me otherwise,

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
54. And I am not a latina either, or born in Mexico City
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 08:21 PM
Feb 2016

sorry if my interest lies in policy and as such I tend to read into income inequality and issues of poverty and race and mass incarceration. So to say that I happen to write on issues that are now part of the national zeitgeist and conversation, you at least have that right.

You should read Picketty, or perhaps not. That is one heavy lift. And it might shatter some of your believes. Perhaps The Shock Doctrine would be good, but that might require you to get out of your comfort zone.

At least now we have established that you are posting to goad people into attacking you, not to have a serious conversation, if that had to be established at all.

Arazi

(6,829 posts)
48. And Omaha Steve is "faking" his terminal illness
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 08:17 PM
Feb 2016

as well as the others who've been attacked by the HRC swarm



Shameful

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
55. Yup., decided to keep it to just myself
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 08:24 PM
Feb 2016

but I see a triple standard. Double would be too easy for these guys. Play the victim card but victimize people while at it and then claim the Godgather (Sanders) ordered it.

It is starting to remind me of this.



Speaking of 2008 dirty tricks... in this case a badly executed republican one

SidDithers

(44,228 posts)
11. Nailed it...nt
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 07:12 PM
Feb 2016

Sid

liberal N proud

(60,378 posts)
40. Exactly
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 08:11 PM
Feb 2016

But then you gust get bashed virtually for not falling in line!

Matariki

(18,775 posts)
3. I'm debating the merits of the ignore function
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 06:48 PM
Feb 2016

On one hand, good to know the enemy. On the other, it's exhausting reading their bullshit.

 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
4. Guess you got two bad reviews by the replies
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 06:49 PM
Feb 2016

count, since I must have those people on ignore.

LOLZ

joshcryer

(62,296 posts)
6. This primary is still tamer than 2008.
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 06:49 PM
Feb 2016

By a long shot.

 

farleftlib

(2,125 posts)
9. Thank god for the internet and alternative media
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 07:00 PM
Feb 2016

These lies get debunked fairly quickly but there's a group that just doubles down on the lies.

You're right, of course. Thanks for posting.

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
12. ROFL
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 07:14 PM
Feb 2016

From the group that has spent the last three months referring to Ms. Clinton as some kind of evil liar, and appeal for needing the other group in the general!



You guys make me laugh so hard. The lack of self-awareness is breathtaking.

 

AzDar

(14,023 posts)
33. 'Evil' is debatable... 'Liar' is NOT.
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 08:06 PM
Feb 2016







Hope this helps...

nashville_brook

(20,958 posts)
16. let them just crank to each other.
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 07:28 PM
Feb 2016

don't engage.

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
18. Plausible explanation: Stopping Bernie is more important than electing Hillary
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 07:31 PM
Feb 2016

If the premise is that the elections are a show for the masses then it doesn't matter to the power brokers whether the winner is an R or D, as long as it is their pick. If taking out Bernie costs them Hillary they will still have the R.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
22. Yeah, 'cause the Bernie fans have been so courteous to Clinton and her supporters.
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 07:33 PM
Feb 2016

I'm unimpressed by Victim Card.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
25. Don't forget the alert button
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 07:54 PM
Feb 2016

they are relentless

Blue_In_AK

(46,436 posts)
36. I was with you until the last paragraph.
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 08:07 PM
Feb 2016

I don't think we need to be alert-happy, just glance at it and move on. We all know when it's pointless to engage, so when the instigators have only themselves to talk to, they'll get bored and the threads will sink. If we aggressively alert (on either side), it just creates more negativity.

Response to redgreenandblue (Original post)

nc4bo

(17,651 posts)
47. Lawd
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 08:16 PM
Feb 2016


For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.


Hmmmmmmmm

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
50. Gad this is good
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 08:17 PM
Feb 2016

the genocide card...

tularetom

(23,664 posts)
52. An example of "dehumanizing", please?
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 08:18 PM
Feb 2016

I'd love to hear what you consider to be "an early step in genocide".

applegrove

(119,246 posts)
57. Dehumanizing is an early step in genocide. No bit of Hillary's narrative is allowed.
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 08:26 PM
Feb 2016

Not one iota of anything positive or empathetic about her. It all gets attacked. She's been a great Senator with one bad, bad vote meant to give weapon inspectors leverage. She's been a great SOS. She's a great woman committed to children and women. She's funny. She's brilliant. Wicked smart. She kind. She has survived decades of GOP constant attacks. She wiped the floor with Trent Gowdy during the Benghazi hearings. She's a detailed person. Her Wall Street reforms are better and broader than Bernie's.

Arazi

(6,829 posts)
44. There's self confessed trolls here as well as those spreading FUD
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 08:14 PM
Feb 2016

don't feed the trolls!

one_voice

(20,043 posts)
58. Locking...
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 08:27 PM
Feb 2016

Doesn't meet SoP for GDP.

Statement of Purpose

Disruptive meta-discussion is forbidden.
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»PSA: Don't be baited by t...