2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSanders Pressed on Reparations at Forum on Black America
http://www.buzzfeed.com/evanmcsan/sanders-reparations#.oc6BaDGogResponse to bravenak (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
bravenak
(34,648 posts)AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)They both attended DFL Party fundraising dinner AFTER Bernie attended the Black American Forum which Hillary was invited to but declined to attend.
http://www.mprnews.org/story/2016/02/11/clinton-sanders-mn-campaign-event-separately
This is a major coup for the Minnesota DFL party to get both remaining candidates for the Democratic presidential nomination at this dinner. They are expecting 4,000 people to attend raising around $1 million. With Sanders and Clinton both here, the DFL party chair expects this to be the biggest party fundraiser in history. Their appearances at the 5th annual Humphrey-Mondale dinner come just one night after the two had another feisty debate in Milwaukee.
Sanders appeared at the Black America Forum at Minneapolis Patrick Henry High School Friday afternoon.
http://kstp.com/politics/clinton-sanders-democratic-presidential-campaign-minnesota/4046147/
bravenak
(34,648 posts)BainsBane
(53,032 posts)and in MN. She cancelled local events her campaign had scheduled here to be in S Carolina. She did attend the Humphrey-Mondale dinner.
I learned this from her MN campaign staff directly because I was supposed to be invited to a MN event.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)BainsBane
(53,032 posts)They don't. This is just an excuse to try to attack Hillary. I suppose they think it makes up for the continual attacks on John Lewis, Ta' Neshi Coates, Black Lives Matter, Elon James White, and all the other black activists and voters of color keyboard warriors have worked so hard to alienate.
Now we might well ask why Bernie isn't at the event in S Carolina that Clinton is attending, but frankly I can't manage that degree of pettiness.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)She was invited to the Black Forum and declined ... and she WAS in Minnesota.
BainsBane
(53,032 posts)Okay, given that you want to play games, why didn't Sanders appear at the event in S Carolina? Why is the Mpls even the one that matters and not the S Carolina ones?
You do realize that Clinton has met with community groups in MN before. Bernie was here not long ago, and I didn't read anything about his scheduling anything other than a big rally. Whereas the last time Clinton was here she met with a number of community groups, including local Somali leaders. Now that Bernie decides to do something, you accuse Clinton of negligence for not turning up for simply because Bernie did, whereas all the dozens and hundreds of events Bernie didn't attend in the past don't matter to this argument because that would require caring about something besides making cheap, empty attacks to promote one person's career. This after thousands of Sanders supporters have spent the last few days insulting John Lewis, just as they attack and berate anyone who dares to exercise their democratic rights, rights John Lewis risked his life for, only to be insulted by the self-entitled, certain that they and they alone are the only human beings on the planet whose views or votes matter.
So what exactly is the issue? Clinton is obliged to follow Sanders everywhere he goes? He owns her schedule? Obviously the issue is not whether the candidates meet with community groups, because if that were the case you would have insisted your own candidate do so on one of his many trips to Mpls in the past. Of course, what's the point if it isn't in front of cameras?
Those are rhetorical questions. I am not interested in pursuing the discussion further because I find personality politics mind-numbingly empty.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Avalux
(35,015 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Empowerer
(3,900 posts)Sometimes we spread ourselves out in different places around the country and candidates can actually interact with us in separate places on the same day and they don't have to both be at the same event to talk to us.
Cool, eh?
Avalux
(35,015 posts)CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)Reeling in Wall Street, Single Payor Health Care... Those might just equlibrate with Reparations.. with the dramatic improvement in the quality of life and life goal formation that would accrue from such policy..
bravenak
(34,648 posts)He refused to speak about reparations
TipTok
(2,474 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)TipTok
(2,474 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)TipTok
(2,474 posts)... but am still interested enough for a summary.
Go for it...
bravenak
(34,648 posts)NowSam
(1,252 posts)Pay the decendent's of slaves reparations for the stolen labor that made the landowners rich. If the heirs cab profit from that labor several generations later than shouldn't they share the wealth with the decendents of those who broke their backs in the fields to enrich them?
TipTok
(2,474 posts)NowSam
(1,252 posts)across generations. why not the decendents of those who did the work? I don't know. Seems to be the decent thing to do.
TipTok
(2,474 posts)... Still living the plantation life after a dozen or so direct father to son handoffs?
NowSam
(1,252 posts)I'm just playing devils advocate here. I think the best reparations would be to look for a more just fair society moving forward. Tuition free college and Healthcare is a great start.
TipTok
(2,474 posts)NowSam
(1,252 posts)Slavery is a horrible injustice and it is understandable to me the request for reparations but I where to we start? How far do you go back? There have been horrible injustices perpetrated on human beings and entire swaths of the Earth's population since the dawn of civilization.
Bernie is trying to correct things by pointing out injustices like the 1% at the top taking all the wealth.
Ultimately and in the hopes of clarifying - I am not for or against reparations - I am just exploring the question and I think it is a conversation worth having.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Last edited Sat Feb 13, 2016, 01:39 AM - Edit history (1)
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Away from Sanders I guess
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)thereismore
(13,326 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)thereismore
(13,326 posts)Arazi
(6,829 posts)JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)sheshe2
(83,754 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)Last edited Sat Feb 13, 2016, 01:54 AM - Edit history (1)
msongs
(67,405 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)SMC22307
(8,090 posts)http://www.democracynow.org/2016/2/10/ta_nehisi_coates_is_voting_for
Smart man, and smart son. They understand what's at stake.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)SMC22307
(8,090 posts)Group hug for everyone!
No, should it?
Every man and woman have a right to vote. No one should bully another and tell them how and why they should vote. Do I agree with his vote? No. Yet it his vote and I will not bully him to 'splain it to me. His right. His vote.
My concern, I do not want a REPUKE anywhere close to the Oval Office. If they get there our children will suffer for years. The Court will be decided and a lifetime of suffering will follow. Our children and our children's children will suffer.
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)Yes, think of the children.
sheshe2
(83,754 posts)My choice. Mine.
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)jillan
(39,451 posts)SMC22307
(8,090 posts)But the Clinton Machine is just getting warmed up, so all this is good practice. The GOP will be child's play compared to Hillary, Brock, et al.
Hillary. Must. Not. Lose. Twice.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)...with what is basically a bribe to shut up and quit fighting for change. It does NOTHING to actually END structural racism and white privilege.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Nobody could end antisemitism post holocause but reparations were paid. Not enough. But something. Did antisemitism go away? No, it's still here getting worse. At least we can do a little to repair the damage.
Have a nice day.
Wig Master
(95 posts)But Ill say this and Ill say this as a Sanders supporter-Ill come clean on that. The idea that Bernie Sanders becomes the target of race-line activists now, and not Hillary Clinton, is just beyond me and it smells. It smells to high heaven.
You might say, well, shes not the one who pushed through NAFTA or signed the omnibus crime bill, or ended the federal governments commitment to direct provision of income support or housing that her husband did. But she supported all that stuff then. My mind is blown by the understanding of politics that undergirds this perspective that people like Coates and proud TFA alum Deray McKesson and holy roller Marissa Johnson and all those others embrace. Its fundamentally anti-left. The only thing you can say is that this is a class program. That this is a program that expresses and connects with the interests, or the world view, if not interests-although they do come together-of an aspiring or upwardly mobile stratum of the black and other colored PMC (professional managerial class) that scoffs and sneers at programs of material redistribution.
When I was working in the GI movement, when people like that would come into the meeting, Id just ask them So which branch of military intelligence are you assigned to?
http://johnhalle.com/outragesandinterludes/?p=741
Liberaltalker
(59 posts)The difference is that in of the case the reparations payed after WW2 to both Jewish people and Japanese Americans it was payed to those who were directly affected by those events. They were still alive. I do believe that during the time of reconstruction former slaves should have absolutely been granted reparations, but we are many generations removed from that time. Not even President Obama thinks reparations should be granted. Its a none starter, and its not fair to judge a presidential candidate negatively for his stance on this issue.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)The case for reparations lays it out beautifully
840high
(17,196 posts)sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)JI7
(89,249 posts)i don't think Sanders himself is totally opposed to it. at least i don't think he would have a problem with it . but many white people supporting him would.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)that forum, in spite of being in the State. She had a fundraiser with you know, people with money.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Billsmile
(404 posts)By sticking up for all those damaged by a rigged system Sanders' solutions are in sync with Dr. King's economic solutions.
http://www.prrac.org/pdf/FreedomBudget.pdf
99Forever
(14,524 posts)Not just for Sanders, but for every POTUS candidate. Period.
It's nothing but a weak sauce, cheap, dirty, rotten, lousy, slimy, sleazy attempt at shitty "gotcha" smear.
When you are prepared to hold every other candidate's feet to the fire equally, get back to us.
Till then...
... meh, who gives a fuck?