2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSanders wants raw vote count from Iowa
Bernie Sanders wants raw vote count released after tight finish in Iowa caucuses
Bernie Sanders has called on the Democratic party to release a raw vote count in Iowa after a nail-biting finish left lingering doubts over the first, much tighter-than-expected, clash with Hillary Clinton for the presidential nomination.
I honestly dont know what happened. I know there are some precincts that have still not reported. I can only hope and expect that the count will be honest, he said. I have no idea. Did we win the popular vote? I dont know, but as much information as possible should be made available.
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/feb/02/bernie-sanders-requests-vote-count-tight-finish-iowa-caucus-clinton
madokie
(51,076 posts)with all of them going Hillary's way is enough to invalidate this whole charade.
Whats the chances of tossing a coin and it come up heads 7 times in a row.
BadgerKid
(4,567 posts)Improbable does not mean impossible.
madokie
(51,076 posts)The powers to be are working their asses off right now trying to finagle the numbers to give this to Clinton.
That you can believe.
pengu
(462 posts)madokie
(51,076 posts)heads I win and tails you lose on the other. I'll believe that
I call bullshit on this whole charade
Nothing personal to you though
pengu
(462 posts)The story here is her losing a 30 point lead in 3 months and having to rely on luck to (barely) eke out a win.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)Give each candidate a half delegate.
madokie
(51,076 posts)this isn't the end of the world. Just that he came away with what he did in spite of the msm and big moneyed interest says he Won big time
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)Bernie has shown he CAN go against the establishment and spread his message against all odds
madokie
(51,076 posts)I think I'll load up the golf cart and go see if I can find a mess of Wild Onions to celebrate.
My brother told me he found a mess of onions last Saturday so I know they're up. I might even get lucky and find a mess of Oyster mushrooms . Yummy yummy
President Sanders sure has a good sound to it, just rolls of the tongue so sweet like. As Jimmy Buffett would say, Like honey dew vine water
I feel so good, damn I feel the Bern and love it. I'm on cloud nine and my feet haven't touched the floor yet this morning
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)I LOVE me some oyster mushrooms. Living in the state of FL, however, means I pay $3-4 for 4oz, twice the price of Crimini and 3x the price of white buttons.
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)Last edited Tue Feb 2, 2016, 02:12 PM - Edit history (1)
madokie
(51,076 posts)FUCK you to them at that. I love it, where we are on this
DrDan
(20,411 posts)KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)Sanders, not Cali.
From one grammar Nazi to another, thanks!
pengu
(462 posts)It is definitely stupid. We have a long history of deciding ties with coin flips or card draws though. It's mostly small local elections though.
bklyncowgirl
(7,960 posts)This is tinfoil hat territory but the probability that all coin tosses went Hillary's way seems unlikely.
Flying Squirrel
(3,041 posts)bklyncowgirl
(7,960 posts)I do think that the image of party officials palming loaded coins is a bit far fetched but hey, you never know.
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)Just that they're improbable. Winning the powerball is something like 1 in 300 mill or so, but there are a lot of powerball winners out there.
beerandjesus
(1,301 posts)I couldn't believe it, it's one of those things that you know is conceivable, but don't expect to ever see. I just stared at it thinking about how I would almost certainly never see that happen again.
Flying Squirrel
(3,041 posts)That was the subject of a Twilight Zone episode. Me, I once dropped a bar of soap in the shower and it landed on its edge (the short side too!)... Crazy.
ErisDiscordia
(443 posts)Coins can't count, so it is possible. Unlikely, but possible. Just barely.
svpadgham
(670 posts)Coin toss are not 50/50. There is a better chance that the side that starts facing up is more likely to finish that way. I've tested this many times with the "flick it in the air, catch it, and flip it onto the back of my other hand" method, and the result skews far in favor of the side facing up at the start.
Thor_MN
(11,843 posts)So you believe that the coin tosses in seven different precincts were rigged, that "they" were prepared for ties in all the precincts, just in case? That there was a designated coin tosser in place to literally throw the precincts in case of a tie?
Wow, with allegations such as that, one could have their own series on cable TV...
svpadgham
(670 posts)I explained my method. You can try it if you like. I also made no allegations. I just stated you could rig a coin toss.
Thor_MN
(11,843 posts)Feel free to post your statistics for your method...
For your alleged conspiracy theory to hold up, one would have to assume that "they" had a prepared, trained coin tosser in every precinct that was close. It would be beyond belief that anyone would bother to plan a complicated method to throw the results in case of a tie...
CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)Toss it!
pengu
(462 posts)But still... Your point stands.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)madokie
(51,076 posts)I really hate to go there
But I wonder if you're not on to something with that comment.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)They are terrified of Sanders.
madokie
(51,076 posts)Terrified is putting it mildly
The long knifes will come out now fore shore.
the PTB have a lot to lose on this election and I'm sure they're cutting checks to Hill as I type. Maybe to her 'super pacs' but either way it benefits her and her only
ieoeja
(9,748 posts)madokie
(51,076 posts)I expected it too
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)should insist on scrupulous vote counts. And recounts if there is question. I commend Bernie for insisting on a recount. Perhaps it will encourage other states to tighten up their procedures.
Of course, with the kind of sloppiness that is obviously common, a recount could also benefit Hillary, though too slightly to matter.
SamKnause
(13,127 posts)Bernie congratulated Hillary and Martin.
Since when is it considered a congratulation saying you are excited about getting
into a debate ???
I don't why the Guardian would say that.
Divernan
(15,480 posts)polly7
(20,582 posts)That's rude.
Bernie is class, period.
Response to SamKnause (Reply #3)
PeaceNikki This message was self-deleted by its author.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)Here's her email:
I'm so grateful to everyone who called a neighbor, or knocked a door, or contributed -- you've poured your dreams and determination into this campaign. You never lost faith. Anytime we got knocked down, you got right back up.
You haven't gotten as much credit as you deserve, PeaceNikki-- but there are hundreds of thousands of people just like you, and none of this would have been possible without you.
Tomorrow, we'll look forward to New Hampshire, Nevada, South Carolina, and beyond. Chip in just $1 to let me know you're with me and ready to win the nomination and the presidency.
I congratulate Senator Sanders and Governor O'Malley for a hard-fought race, and I look forward to the debate on Thursday. But the truth remains: Our country has to build on what works. We have to push forward, step by step, day by day -- we have to take on the hard fights that bring about progress.
Hard work is how we passed health care reform and how we expanded Social Security -- it's how we fought for civil rights, voting rights, worker's rights, women's rights, and LGBT rights. It's the story of America.
Together, you and I are writing a new chapter in that story, alongside millions of men and women across the country who share our belief that a better future is possible.
SamKnause
(13,127 posts)She did not congratulate him in her speech.
She did congratulate Martin O'Malley.
FEEL THE BERN
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)At 4:00:
ViseGrip
(3,133 posts)PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)Bernie is a Class Act
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)I caucused for Bernie, and I thought Hillary's speech was fine.
She congratulated her opponents and also welcomed the upcoming debate (campaign) vs Sanders.
This is a silly thing to get bent out of shape about.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)their positions were reversed.
jonno99
(2,620 posts)cyberswede
(26,117 posts)Since delegates are assigned based on percentages, one could have fewer votes, but get the same number of delegates.
In one of our precincts, for example, it was 60-51 for HRC, but each candidate got 3 delegates, so Hillary's slight edge counted only as a tie (which benefitted Bernie).
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)It won't get him any more delegates, but hed be able to say in speeches that he won more votes, but lost the state based on weird rules. That would sway some folks his way in other states if they thought he lost 'unfairly' in Iowa. After all, Gov Snyder, wasn't it, survived his recall simply because voters thought it was 'unfair' to kick him out before he even had a chance to do a full term in office.
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)but earned a comparable number of delegates when it was close. It wouldn't be good PR to demonstrate that HRC got way more individual votes, imo.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)The votes that actually count (at the convention) was a tie.
But Sanders being able to say he won the popular vote would be helpful in dismantling the "he can't win" narrative.
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)That wouldn't help the narrative.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)that's pretty unlikely.
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)But HRC won a lot of precincts.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Vinca
(50,350 posts)To do a recount you would need their physical presence in the same place at the time people were initially counted. It's a really stupid system.
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)And attendees hear what the numbers are.
SBS isn't asking for a recount, just the actual original count.
Vinca
(50,350 posts)That's why it's so stupid.
Response to left-of-center2012 (Original post)
Post removed
HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)R B Garr
(17,026 posts)Last edited Tue Feb 2, 2016, 11:02 AM - Edit history (1)
He needs to maintain his perpetual victim status.
George II
(67,782 posts).........that haven't reported.
Baitball Blogger
(46,827 posts)ecstatic
(32,831 posts)Berned, truly.
aspirant
(3,533 posts)blackspade
(10,056 posts)Tarc
(10,479 posts)A caucus is not a primary.
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)fredamae
(4,458 posts)We'd already be in court.
This isn't a "win" at Best it is a Draw. Period. We have a Race.
The "cheering" Clinton camp looks really foolish, imo. Especially with the curious inconsistencies. The Coin Tosses. Polk County voting inconsistency. And the expression of confidence from a person who just won with a 10% margin-is glaringly in denial.
This on the heels of an existing Trust problem. When the dust settles, the votes are fairly counted...this IA thang could really bite them in the ass.
Uncle Joe
(58,660 posts)Thanks for the thread, left-of-center.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)That's what Barack did when he lost NH.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)studyshare
(49 posts)mhatrw
(10,786 posts)Get over it, Hillary fans. Your sad candidate had to cheat to lose.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)Yupy
(154 posts)bobthedrummer
(26,083 posts)Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.