Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

snagglepuss

(12,704 posts)
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 03:11 PM Jan 2016

How The Clintons Cashed In - How They Made $230 Million Since Leaving The White House












Snip



[After leaving the White House]




The money flowed in fast. Bill delivered the first of hundreds of high-paying speeches on February 5, 2001, less than three weeks after he left the presidency, talking to Morgan Stanley in New York for $125,000. The firm got a bargain. Bill eventually raised his average rate to roughly $225,000 per speech, in some cases charging $500,000, according to disclosure documents Hillary filed as a senator and cabinet member. In 2005, Bill even charged $125,000 for giving a video conference from New York to a group called HSM Italia. All told, he raked in about $100 million from speaking from 2001 to 2014.

The former president also made a fortune writing books. In 2004, he published his memoir My Life, which became a No. 1 New York Times bestseller. From 2001-05, Clinton listed his speaking and writing as a joint business on his tax return, so it’s difficult to tell exactly how much he made from books versus speaking during that period. But the revenues for his speaking engagements are detailed in annual disclosure reports Hillary filed as a senator. Taking those revenues and figuring that his speaking business produced similar margins from 2001-05 to those it made in 2006 and 2007, Forbes estimated how much of his earnings came from each source during the five years in which they are listed as a combined business on the Clintons’ tax returns. According to our calculations, Bill Clinton made an estimated $29 million from writing from 2001-05 and banked another $9 million from 2006 to 2014. The Clintons did not respond to multiple requests for comment.


Bill made money in business as well, charging more than $15 million to serve as an advisor to investment firm Yucaipa, led by billionaire Ron Burkle, from 2003 to 2008. Clinton declared a loss of about $725,000 when he disposed of his Yucaipa partnership in 2008. The next year he began consulting for two other companies, Shangri-La Industries and Wasserman Investments. Over two years, Clinton collected $2.5 million from Shangri-La Industries and $3.1 million from Wasserman Investments.


In 2010, Clinton added his most lucrative consulting client, for-profit college company Laureate Education. Over five years, Laureate paid Clinton a total of $16 million.

The former president also consulted for another for-profit education company, GEMS Education, from 2011 to 2014, earning $6 million over that span.

In total, Bill made a sum of $27 million from consulting, in addition to the millions he got from from Yucaipa.




Read more at


http://www.forbes.com/sites/danalexander/2015/10/13/how-the-clintons-made-more-than-230-million-after-leaving-the-white-house/#45fe4a7e791e










29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How The Clintons Cashed In - How They Made $230 Million Since Leaving The White House (Original Post) snagglepuss Jan 2016 OP
I can't fault them for making money. If someone was willing pay me that, I'd take it. Vinca Jan 2016 #1
How much is enough? Jimmy Carter,he ain't cali Jan 2016 #6
Hillary helped Swiss bank UBS avoid IRS the surprise, surprise UBS gave Bill $1.5 million to speak snagglepuss Jan 2016 #7
It's a definition of corruption. Nyan Feb 2016 #26
Selling Americans out one day at a time. JRLeft Jan 2016 #2
So? I have no problem with them making money, and also funding the CGI and The Clinton Foundation Lucinda Jan 2016 #3
Here's my take. After the first 50 million or so, it looks like greed to me. cali Jan 2016 #9
Gomez and Fester know the book. Juicy_Bellows Jan 2016 #10
This message was self-deleted by its author snagglepuss Jan 2016 #4
People are going to look back on this like the Robber Baron era. Gilded age corruption leveymg Jan 2016 #5
It's the American Way of American politics. From "dead broke" to millionaires. Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2016 #8
Doesn't bother me. The Clinton's weren't paupers before Bill Clinton's election. apnu Jan 2016 #11
Like everybody in the top 0.01%, they deserve every penny! They totally earned it with mhatrw Jan 2016 #12
Odd how Hillary never speaks proudly of making it to the tippy top .01% snagglepuss Jan 2016 #13
. snagglepuss Feb 2016 #24
Now show us the money the Bushes have made after leaving office... Blue_Tires Jan 2016 #14
Not even close. cali Jan 2016 #15
k+r Attorney in Texas Jan 2016 #16
I thought today would be a good day as any to kick this thread. snagglepuss Feb 2016 #25
agreed Attorney in Texas Feb 2016 #28
She's of and for the millionaires and billionaires, not for the middle class nt amborin Jan 2016 #17
If you're gonna grift, go big. hifiguy Jan 2016 #18
I don't understand how anyone not in the top 5% justifies this corrupt sleeziness. snagglepuss Feb 2016 #21
The Clintons make the Palin clan hifiguy Feb 2016 #22
You'd think after all the money amassed she'd know how to answer a question snagglepuss Feb 2016 #23
I wonder how much Jimmy Carter has made since leaving office... kath Feb 2016 #19
Great question. snagglepuss Feb 2016 #20
Here it is. Nyan Feb 2016 #27
. snagglepuss Apr 2016 #29

Vinca

(50,271 posts)
1. I can't fault them for making money. If someone was willing pay me that, I'd take it.
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 03:14 PM
Jan 2016

It does make me wonder if this is why Hillary doesn't seem to understand the need for single-payer or fully funded college. I imagine after you're rolling in millions for awhile you forget how the other half lives.

Nyan

(1,192 posts)
26. It's a definition of corruption.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 09:38 AM
Feb 2016

The Clintons cashed in more than any other first couples because everybody knew Hillary was running for president.

Lucinda

(31,170 posts)
3. So? I have no problem with them making money, and also funding the CGI and The Clinton Foundation
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 03:16 PM
Jan 2016

They are doing very good work worldwide.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
9. Here's my take. After the first 50 million or so, it looks like greed to me.
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 03:22 PM
Jan 2016

The endless pursuit of more. Clinton Inc.
.

Response to snagglepuss (Original post)

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
5. People are going to look back on this like the Robber Baron era. Gilded age corruption
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 03:18 PM
Jan 2016

in America but without the broad progress. A time of I've got mine, Jack and rot from the top down.

apnu

(8,756 posts)
11. Doesn't bother me. The Clinton's weren't paupers before Bill Clinton's election.
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 03:41 PM
Jan 2016

They were doing fine before, better than most, even before Bill became Governor of Arkansas.

They're wealthy, like most politicians in America these days.

Having a discussion about the intersection of wealth and power which leads to corruption, that is far more important topic I think.

mhatrw

(10,786 posts)
12. Like everybody in the top 0.01%, they deserve every penny! They totally earned it with
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 04:51 PM
Jan 2016

blood, sweat and power brokering among the other hyper elites.

snagglepuss

(12,704 posts)
13. Odd how Hillary never speaks proudly of making it to the tippy top .01%
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 05:28 PM
Jan 2016

Actually she never speaks of it all.

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
18. If you're gonna grift, go big.
Sun Jan 31, 2016, 08:02 PM
Jan 2016

The Clintons have one principle and only one - the enrichment of the Clintons by whatever means are available.

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
22. The Clintons make the Palin clan
Mon Feb 1, 2016, 11:39 PM
Feb 2016

look like the small-time chiselers they truly are. Like the Palins, they have the souls of cheap carnies but a lot more brains/education and better connections. Grifting $200 million is a genuine accomplishment. Of some kind. That's Bush-league corruption and influence-peddling.

snagglepuss

(12,704 posts)
23. You'd think after all the money amassed she'd know how to answer a question
Thu Feb 4, 2016, 07:01 PM
Feb 2016

about the $675,000 windfall from Goldman Sachs.

Nyan

(1,192 posts)
27. Here it is.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 09:47 AM
Feb 2016
...Jimmy Carter, who also left the White House broke, has made millions off of the 14 books he has written. But as of 2012 his net worth was only $7 million, according to 24/7 Wall Street, and he has done nothing since that would have increased it dramatically enough to rival the value of Bill Cllinton's assets...


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2656456/The-Clintons-RICHEST-living-ex-family.html#ixzz41NMujM74
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»How The Clintons Cashed I...