2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBernie Sanders Is Winning With The One Group His Rivals Can't Sway: Voters - Guardian
Bernie Sanders is winning with the one group his rivals can't sway: votersPerhaps more important than Sanderss gain in the polls is how it happened: by patiently hammering on his message, regardless of what other candidates said
Trevor Timm - Guardian
1/14/16
<snip>
As Trump continues to dominate both parties for media attention, and Hillary Clinton remains a favorite to win with Wall Street, Bernie Sanders is suddenly surging again among those who actually matter: voters. But more important than his rise in the polls is how hes doing it.
A string of polls over the past two weeks show that the once-independent Vermont senator is tied or in the lead in the two early primary states, Iowa and New Hampshire, and all of a sudden, in striking distance of Hillary Clinton nationally. With very little fanfare, he has been leading in New Hampshire for months, with some recent ones putting his lead in the double digits.
But Iowa seemed distinctly in Clintons corner for the last quarter of 2015 until this week, just a month away from the primary. A Quinnipiac poll released Tuesday night showed Sanders vaulted into the lead, with a slew of others show him pulling in close to a tie.
Digging deeper into the numbers shows even more good news for Sanders: nationally, he is beating Clinton by 2-1 with voters younger than 45, and by 20 points with female voters younger than 35. In New Hampshire there is not one demographic group in which Clinton is beating Sanders. Hes also made recent gains among African Americans and Hispanics both demographics long considered Clinton strongholds.
But perhaps more important than the news of Sanderss gain is how it happened: by patiently hammering on his message of drawing attention to economic inequality, raising taxes on the rich, dramatically expanding Medicare and Social Security, making public universities free of charge and criminal justice reform.
He has, to great criticism by beltway pundits, avoided the rest of the candidates descent into constant fear-mongering about terrorism and hyping the threat from Isis. Instead he has mocked both the media and other candidates for doing so, as BuzzFeed reported last month:
Clinton, meanwhile...
<snip>
More: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jan/14/bernie-sanders-is-winning-with-the-one-group-his-rivals-cant-sway-voters
Punkingal
(9,522 posts)But its clear that Sanders is not going to fade away, as many predicted in the fall after it looked like his support was leveling off; he is only getting stronger. Given that most voters dont even start paying attention until after the Iowa caucus, Democrats would do themselves well by putting the Clinton coronation on hold for now.
lewebley3
(3,412 posts)Are you the new king of the non sequitur? Of just a run of the mill troll?
Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)lewebley3
(3,412 posts)Party people like Patrick Leahy of VT, will not be a delegate
for Sanders.
Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)lewebley3
(3,412 posts)Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)lewebley3
(3,412 posts)When black lives maters confronted Sanders, he screamed
and ran away.
Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)You're quite literally spewing the opposite of reality.
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)in_cog_ni_to
(41,600 posts)Is a Badge if HONOR! He doesn't need their support. He has US, WE THE PEOPLE - THE VOTERS. Believe it or not, that "Dem Party" works for us. Those paychecks and all the money they waste, is money WE THE PEOPLE give them when we pay taxes. THEY WORK FOR US. We're THEIR bosses. They're suppose to do what WE THE PEOPLE hired them to do...not the other way around.
Bernie wants to work for US. The way it's suppose to be. He doesn't need the so-called "Democratic" party's support. We The People have his back. The Oligarchs' days are numbered.
This is a movement and it's NOT going away. It just grows stronger every day, so that "Dem Party" you seem to worship can kiss our collective arses.
PEACE
LOVE
BERNIE
CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)THAT is WHY he actually has the support of the VOTERS! We must watch for cheating NOW! Especially where electronic voting machines come into play!
The CORPORATISTS are pulling out ALL the stops to upend Bernie and install Clinton Inc. back in the WH! Remember the busing in of Chicago kids in exchange for IPODS in 2008 to caucus for Obama... That CHEATING made the difference. Remember also...
Hillary came in THIRD... BEHIND John Edwards!
lewebley3
(3,412 posts)lewebley3
(3,412 posts)If someone is so-called it's Sanders he is not a Dem
eggplant
(3,915 posts)ha.
vkkv
(3,384 posts)LibDemAlways
(15,139 posts)media blackout in the US to prevent voters from hearing Sanders' message. What the establishment media failed to realize was that they've become irrelevant. Sanders' message got out through social media and by word of mouth.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)lewebley3
(3,412 posts)shawn703
(2,702 posts)Lordy lordy lordy
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)Old Crow
(2,212 posts)This old crow gives your post a high-five.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)azmom
(5,208 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)It makes me want to vomit on her.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)mountain grammy
(26,659 posts)Uncle Joe
(58,459 posts)Thanks for the thread, WillyT.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)It is his message, not the messenger himself (old male), that is resonating with them. That isn't what it is supposed to be all about? My daughters (31 and 36), and their female friends, all support Bernie over Hillary. Gender alone is not enough. Support crazy Michelle Bachman just because she is your gender? Hell NO. It has to be the RIGHT woman candidate. If a male candidate's stance on the issues is better than the female candidate's stance, then support the MALE.
Additionally, I am a former Independent, now a Democrat. Bernie and I have that in common also. It was my DAUGHTERS who convinced me to switch.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)I mean, beyond telegraphing that the data is cherry picked?
Bob_in_VA
(89 posts)The first sentence is specific to Bernie's standing versus Hillary's in New Hampshire. The second sentence refers to Bernie's standing nationally versus Hillary. Two different demographics.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)"Nationally" appears nowhere is the second sentence.
Perhaps the writer was just being lazy, though.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,716 posts)Clinton still outpaces Sanders across all demographic subgroups of Democrats most notably, non-whites (92 percent favorable) and liberals, with whom 88 percent rate Clinton positively and 74 percent say the same of Sanders. But Clinton's advantage in favorable ratings is clearest among moderate and conservative Democrats, among whom 80 percent give Clinton favorable marks but only 41 percent rate Sanders positivel
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/01/13/poll-views-of-trump-carson-and-bush-dim-as-christie-and-cruz-rise/
I will let others draw their own inferences.
Number23
(24,544 posts)Am I missing something? Has there ever been an article who's title and content could not have been more contradictory and at odds with one another???
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,716 posts)Metric System
(6,048 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)pablo_marmol
(2,375 posts)Every time Cenk yelled WRONG! I screamed........and STILL DO!
To say that Uyger's excitement is contagious would be an incredible understatement!
GO BERNIE!!