Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Inquiring minds want to know if Earth has the same amount of H2O it had (Original Post) snagglepuss Mar 2012 OP
Probably not izquierdista Mar 2012 #1
So the water we guzzle is the same water guzzled by dinosaurs? snagglepuss Mar 2012 #3
Most of it izquierdista Mar 2012 #6
Thanks for your explanations. It's staggering to think that we drink something snagglepuss Mar 2012 #11
And peed out by dinosaurs! Chemisse Mar 2012 #10
We've probably lost all the water contained in Appolo astronout urine n/t arcane1 Mar 2012 #2
while i don't know the answer to your question - marasinghe Mar 2012 #4
Water is also broken down during photosynthisis to provide all the hydrogens to attach to carbon Salviati Mar 2012 #5
Escape velocty? 1620rock Mar 2012 #7
Possibly more Dead_Parrot Mar 2012 #8
There is a very slow loss of water due to photodissociation in the upper atmosphere ... eppur_se_muova Mar 2012 #9
It's probably got more Warpy Mar 2012 #12
 

izquierdista

(11,689 posts)
1. Probably not
Fri Mar 9, 2012, 11:24 PM
Mar 2012

There is one process to lose H2O, that of molecules high in the atmosphere getting enough of a kick from other molecules to knock them past escape velocity and off they go into the cosmos. Then there is a process of gaining H2O, from comets and meteors and other foreign bodies that enter the atmosphere. Oh, they may lose the water to the atmosphere as they enter since they will be very hot, but the water comes in with them.

What you have to do is figure out which rate is higher. Given the amount of water on the planet, I would guess that it is the second one.

 

izquierdista

(11,689 posts)
6. Most of it
Sat Mar 10, 2012, 01:50 AM
Mar 2012

You can calculate those two rates I noted, but when divided by the amount of mass firmly held on the planet, it's going to be a very, very small number.

snagglepuss

(12,704 posts)
11. Thanks for your explanations. It's staggering to think that we drink something
Sat Mar 10, 2012, 11:17 AM
Mar 2012

that is hundreds of millions years old.

marasinghe

(1,253 posts)
4. while i don't know the answer to your question -
Fri Mar 9, 2012, 11:55 PM
Mar 2012

from high-school chemistry:
although it is a pretty stable compound, water will react with halides -- Flourine, Chlorine, etc..
it will also be removed from it's free state - by bonding with crystals, and, in forming other types of non-chemical bonds (i think).
and, i have no idea how much water -- if any -- man-made synthetic manufacture will use up to form other compounds.
the expanding human population, all use water to form their digestive juices - Hydrochloric acid.
so, there is a possibility that the amount of water within the Earth's eco-system, has diminished.

not to mention the quantity of potable fresh water, available.

Salviati

(6,008 posts)
5. Water is also broken down during photosynthisis to provide all the hydrogens to attach to carbon
Sat Mar 10, 2012, 01:41 AM
Mar 2012

and is created when we metabolize sugars when those hydrogens are reunited with the oxygen that we breath.

1620rock

(2,218 posts)
7. Escape velocty?
Sat Mar 10, 2012, 03:12 AM
Mar 2012

"molecules high in the atmosphere getting enough of a kick from other molecules to knock them past escape velosity and off they go into the cosmos."

Not doubting you here, but escape velosity...isn't that around 24000 MPH?

eppur_se_muova

(36,261 posts)
9. There is a very slow loss of water due to photodissociation in the upper atmosphere ...
Sat Mar 10, 2012, 05:07 AM
Mar 2012

this results in free atomic H and H2, which are volatile enough to escape Earth's gravity. This is a very slow process, however, and probably has been more than compensated for by the infall of meteoritic dust and cometary debris.

http://books.google.com/books?id=hWa0LcQNZhcC&pg=PA5&lpg=PA5&dq=photodissociation+of+water+in+upper+atmosphere&source=bl&ots=9JBa0qvKlI&sig=6S5ee0Ydm4nw7ihOE1NoUJW2bAs&hl=en&sa=X&ei=uBVbT5u-F5CItwfsxsiFDA&ved=0CEcQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=photodissociation%20of%20water%20in%20upper%20atmosphere&f=false

Mars, with its lower gravity and no ozone shield to block UV, would be more subject to this effect, and the loss of water from Mars by this process has probably been much more significant.

Warpy

(111,255 posts)
12. It's probably got more
Sat Mar 10, 2012, 03:16 PM
Mar 2012

because of all the icy space junk raining down through the atmosphere every year.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Inquiring minds want to k...