Less knowledge, more power: Uninformed can be vital to democracy, study finds
http://www.princeton.edu/main/news/archive/S32/37/23Q43/index.xml?section=topstories[font face="Times, Serif"][font size="5"]Less knowledge, more power: Uninformed can be vital to democracy, study finds[/font]
Posted December 15, 2011; 02:00 p.m.
by Morgan Kelly
Contrary to the ideal of a completely engaged electorate, individuals who have the least interest in a specific outcome can actually be vital to achieving a democratic consensus. These individuals dilute the influence of powerful minority factions who would otherwise dominate everyone else, according to new research published in the journal Science.
A Princeton University-based research team reports Dec. 16 that this finding based on group decision-making experiments on fish, as well as mathematical models and computer simulations can ultimately provide insights into humans' political behavior.
The researchers report that in animal groups, uninformed individuals as in those with no prior knowledge or strong feelings on a situation's outcome tend to side with and embolden the numerical majority. Relating the results to human political activity, the study challenges the common notion that an outspoken minority can manipulate uncommitted voters.
"The classic view is that uninformed or uncommitted individuals may allow extreme views to proliferate. We found that might not be the case," said lead author Iain Couzin, a Princeton assistant professor of ecology and evolutionary biology. He and his co-authors found that even a small population of indifferent individuals act as a counterbalance to the minority whose passion even can cause informed individuals in the majority to waver and restore majority rule.
[/font]