Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

WillyT

(72,631 posts)
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 06:26 PM Jul 2014

Scientists: We're 'Very Close' To Finding Another Earth - CNN

Scientists: We're 'very close' to finding another Earth
By Suzanne Presto, CNN
updated 2:16 PM EDT, Tue July 15, 2014


A team of astronomers announced April 17, 2014, that they have discovered the first Earth-size planet orbiting a star in the so-called "habitable zone" -- the distance from a star where liquid water might pool on the surface. That doesn't mean this planet has life on it, says Thomas Barclay, a scientist at the Bay Area Environmental Research Institute at Ames and a co-author of a paper on the planet, called Kepler-186f. He says the planet can be thought of as an "Earth-cousin rather than an Earth-twin. It has many properties that resemble Earth." The planet was discovered by NASA's Kepler Space Telescope. It's located about 500 light-years from Earth in the constellation Cygnus. The picture above is an artist's concept of what it might look like.

<snip>

(CNN) -- Scientists looking for signs of life in the universe -- as well as another planet like our own -- are a lot closer to their goal than people realize.

That was the consensus of a panel on the search for life in the universe held at NASA headquarters Monday in Washington. The discussion focused not only on the philosophical question of whether we're alone in the universe but also on the technological advances made in an effort to answer that question.

"We believe we're very, very close in terms of technology and science to actually finding the other Earth and our chance to find signs of life on another world," said Sara Seager, a MacArthur Fellow and professor of planetary science and physics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

"Finding Earth's twin, that's kind of the holy grail," said John Grunsfeld, an astronaut who helped repair the Hubble Space Telescope in 2009 and is now an associate administrator at NASA.
Strides in the search for life.

"We already know that our galaxy has at least 100 billion planets, and we didn't know that five years ago," said Matt Mountain, director of the Space Telescope Science Institute in Maryland.


He credited the work of the Kepler Space Telescope for these new discoveries. The planet-hunting Kepler probe, launched in 2009, finds planets by looking for dips in the brightness of a star as a planet transits, or crosses, in front of that star.

Kepler also found the first Earth-size planet that orbits in a star's habitable zone, the area around a star where a planet could exist with liquid water on its surface.

<snip>

More: http://www.cnn.com/2014/07/14/tech/nasa-search-for-life/index.html?hpt=hp_c4


16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
8. The worst we could do is rickroll them by high powered radio waves, and have em get it in 100 years.
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 07:06 PM
Jul 2014

but maybe that counts.

randys1

(16,286 posts)
2. Rightwing religious folks heads are exploding to that headline LOL
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 06:30 PM
Jul 2014

Oh no, cant be...that would mean we are not unique or special at all!

longship

(40,416 posts)
3. Too damned bad that Kepler lost its way to point accurately.
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 06:35 PM
Jul 2014

An earth sized planet orbiting a Sol sized star in an earth-sized orbit would take over three years to detect with Kepler's technique. There just was not enough time to complete much of that mission before it failed.

Still, there is still a lot of unanalyzed Kepler data in the queue. But it takes time for verification with much larger, expensive, land-based telescopes. We'll undoubtedly be hearing about this for years to come.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
7. Yes, like the invasion fleet we send to Alpha Centauri that will take 200,000 years to get there.
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 07:00 PM
Jul 2014

They're perfectly safe from us, don't worry.

MuseRider

(34,108 posts)
5. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wump_World
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 06:52 PM
Jul 2014

This is always the first thing I think of when I hear this stuff. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wump_World

EDIT to add link in body

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
6. predictable DU derp science thread responses, ho!
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 06:59 PM
Jul 2014

HUMANS SUCK WUR GONNA DESTROY EVERYTHING OH NO SAVE THEM FROM US WHY CAN'T WE JUST LEAVE WEL ENUF ALONE AND ALL DIE WARGHLLL BARGLE SCIENCE BAD


even if we find another Earth we're not going there to "ruin" it any time soon, people. Educate yourselves about the actual size of the universe- we're a speck on a flea on the ass of another flea speck. And all the other flea ass specks are VERY far away.

Our importance is greatly exaggerated in our own minds AND that includes our ability to "fuck up everything".

Sheesh.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
11. Please tell me what propulsion system you intend to use
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 07:42 PM
Jul 2014

given that the fastest objects the human race has created, the voyager probes, would take 70,000 years to reach Alpha Centauri at current speeds, and they're not even heading in that direction.

Edited to add: IF putting trash into space were a cost-effective way to deal with it- it's not- then sending it into the sun would make a fuckton more sense.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
13. But you'd pollute the sun!
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 10:01 PM
Jul 2014

And if we dumped our radioactive waste at the sun, it would become radioactive!!!

( )

defacto7

(13,485 posts)
14. Nice sentiment.
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 10:40 PM
Jul 2014

Nice to hear this again. We know what the probability is already and there is only so much elation one can have hearing this message... again. And it's great we have Kepler. It's a great tool.

Now let's have some real results please, a solid hit. That's what I want to hear.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Scientists: We're 'Very C...