Tue Jul 31, 2012, 04:38 PM
rug (47,358 posts)
A tale of two logos: Atheist group targeting Wyoming goes after Ohio city over cross
Published: Tuesday, July 31, 2012, 2:25 PM Updated: Tuesday, July 31, 2012, 2:46 PM
By Garret Ellison | gellison@mlive.com STEUBENVILLE, OHIO — An eastern Ohio town with a cross on its logo is standing its ground for the moment against the threat of legal action from the same Wisconsin atheist group taking a similar issue with the city seal in Wyoming. Reporter David Gossett of The Herald Star newspaper in the Upper Ohio Valley reports that city leaders in Steubenville are holding off a prior decision to change the city logo after several attorneys offered the city free legal representation. Both Wyoming and Steubenville have been targeted recently by the Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF) of Madison, Wis., which is demanding each city alter its respective logo to remove small depictions of a Christian cross. The foundation faxed a letter to Wyoming Mayor Jack Poll on July 20 demanding the city change its “unconstitutional” logo, arguing that the addition of the church silhouette on a city insignia violates the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment. http://www.mlive.com/news/grand-rapids/index.ssf/2012/07/a_tale_of_two_city_logos_athei.html I wonder what they're doing for Alexander Aan.
|
34 replies, 1754 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| rug | Jul 2012 | OP | |
| dballance | Jul 2012 | #1 | |
| cbayer | Jul 2012 | #3 | |
| Plantaganet | Aug 2012 | #25 | |
| Goblinmonger | Jul 2012 | #2 | |
| rug | Aug 2012 | #7 | |
| Goblinmonger | Aug 2012 | #24 | |
| Goblinmonger | Jul 2012 | #4 | |
| backscatter712 | Jul 2012 | #5 | |
| rug | Aug 2012 | #8 | |
| trotsky | Aug 2012 | #9 | |
| rug | Aug 2012 | #10 | |
| trotsky | Aug 2012 | #11 | |
| rug | Aug 2012 | #12 | |
| trotsky | Aug 2012 | #13 | |
| rug | Aug 2012 | #14 | |
| trotsky | Aug 2012 | #15 | |
| rug | Aug 2012 | #16 | |
| trotsky | Aug 2012 | #17 | |
| rug | Aug 2012 | #18 | |
| trotsky | Aug 2012 | #19 | |
| rug | Aug 2012 | #20 | |
| trotsky | Aug 2012 | #21 | |
| rug | Aug 2012 | #22 | |
| trotsky | Aug 2012 | #23 | |
| rug | Aug 2012 | #26 | |
| cbayer | Aug 2012 | #27 | |
| trotsky | Aug 2012 | #28 | |
| Rob H. | Aug 2012 | #29 | |
| cbayer | Aug 2012 | #30 | |
| trotsky | Aug 2012 | #31 | |
| madrchsod | Jul 2012 | #6 | |
| dimbear | Aug 2012 | #32 | |
| cbayer | Aug 2012 | #33 | |
| rug | Aug 2012 | #34 |
Response to rug (Original post)
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 05:31 PM
dballance (3,753 posts)
1. "Jews, don't you come around here." The coded message from the past by displaying the cross
|
Someone correct me if I'm wrong. But as I understand it during our not too distant past towns displayed crosses in the town squares, on town seals, and in literature about the town as a coded message to Jews: "STAY AWAY."
|
Response to dballance (Reply #1)
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 05:37 PM
cbayer (120,012 posts)
3. I've never heard that before. I that is so, why haven't Jewish groups protested this
|
or brought lawsuits? Or have they?
|
Response to dballance (Reply #1)
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 11:32 AM
Plantaganet (203 posts)
25. And gays.
|
And, presumably, gay Jews.
|
Response to rug (Original post)
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 05:34 PM
Goblinmonger (16,367 posts)
2. What's the RCC doing for Alexander Aan.
|
Let's see if your crew answers the whistle.
|
Response to Goblinmonger (Reply #2)
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 06:04 AM
rug (47,358 posts)
7. How does that answer my question?
|
Oh, it doesn't. It simply deflects. Again.
|
Response to rug (Reply #7)
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 11:08 AM
Goblinmonger (16,367 posts)
24. No, it points out that you were deflecting.
|
Rather than deal with the issue of the logo of a US city, you bring up something else.
|
Response to rug (Original post)
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 05:46 PM
Goblinmonger (16,367 posts)
4. Here's an activity for those of you that aren't atheists
|
Go here
http://radio.foxnews.com/toddstarnes/top-stories/town-forced-to-remove-cross-from-logo.html And read the replies. THIS is what many atheists have to live with on a daily basis. Perhaps a little understanding for our viewpoint may come from this. Probably not, but it's worth a try. |
Response to Goblinmonger (Reply #4)
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 05:49 PM
backscatter712 (19,841 posts)
5. GAAAAH! My IQ just dropped fifteen points reading the comments there.
|
Once again, I'm convinced that Idiocracy is a documentary.
|
Response to Goblinmonger (Reply #4)
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 06:55 AM
rug (47,358 posts)
8. That's Fox News. They say worse about Obama.
Response to rug (Reply #8)
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 07:09 AM
trotsky (33,013 posts)
9. Would you dismiss hateful comments about any other minority group as blithely, rug?
|
What if it were homosexuals? Jews? Muslims?
Or do you reserve your snark and nastiness only for atheists, cuz we're so special? |
Response to trotsky (Reply #9)
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 07:17 AM
rug (47,358 posts)
10. That is an obnoxious, and false, equivalence.
|
A minority based on an intellectual, and often transient, conclusion, is far from a minority based on sexual orientation, ethnicity or race.
And it's still Fox. |
Response to rug (Reply #10)
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 07:18 AM
trotsky (33,013 posts)
11. So yeah, your hatred and contempt is reserved solely for atheists.
|
Thanks for clearing that up.
|
Response to trotsky (Reply #11)
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 07:20 AM
rug (47,358 posts)
12. You assume, again.
|
You equate not buying bullshit with hatred. The jury is still out on contempt.
|
Response to rug (Reply #12)
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 07:22 AM
trotsky (33,013 posts)
13. Bullshit about what, rug?
|
Do you think church-state separation issues are bullshit?
|
Response to trotsky (Reply #13)
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 07:25 AM
rug (47,358 posts)
14. Hardly.
|
This particular bullshit, as opposed to the general bullshit, is that the comments section of Fox News is illustrative of the particular persecution of atheists.
|
Response to rug (Reply #14)
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 07:36 AM
trotsky (33,013 posts)
15. So anti-atheist hatred that appears on a Fox website can't be used to demonstrate...
|
that anti-atheist hatred exists.
Got it. Thanks for your continued shitting on atheists, rug. You provide a valuable community service. |
Response to trotsky (Reply #15)
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 07:42 AM
rug (47,358 posts)
16. It can in the sense that a bioposy of a suppurating sore shows disease.
|
It would be foolish to then describe the human body as a mass of disease. Extrapolation can be tricky, depending on the sample.
And I again commend you on the heightened tome your last sentence brings. |
Response to rug (Reply #16)
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 07:48 AM
trotsky (33,013 posts)
17. Just calling it as I see it.
|
Which I know is why you reserve particular snappiness for me.
You analogy fails poorly - no one has ever said that EVERYONE hates atheists or that we are discriminated against "no differently" than blacks or homosexuals. Only that anti-atheist discrimination exists and is real. Your continued refusal to accept this basic fact is just another way you enjoy slapping atheists in the face and why you get back exactly what you give. Maybe someday you'll learn and start acting more "Christian." |
Response to trotsky (Reply #17)
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 07:49 AM
rug (47,358 posts)
18. Feel free to do so.
|
Unless you have no choice.
|
Response to rug (Reply #18)
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 07:54 AM
trotsky (33,013 posts)
19. Rounds are over, it appears.
|
Unless you have another snappy last word snipe to make?
|
Response to trotsky (Reply #19)
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 07:57 AM
rug (47,358 posts)
20. As I told your friend, whose motto you've adopted,
|
that is a bigoted remark against anyone who has a mental illness.
|
Response to rug (Reply #20)
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 07:58 AM
trotsky (33,013 posts)
21. Are you calling me a bigot? n/t
Response to trotsky (Reply #21)
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 08:00 AM
rug (47,358 posts)
22. Go ahead. Give a non-bigoted meaning to that phrase.
Response to rug (Reply #22)
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 08:01 AM
trotsky (33,013 posts)
23. Boxing.
|
A very apt analogy to heated discussion and debate.
So, are you calling me a bigot? |
Response to trotsky (Reply #23)
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 01:08 PM
rug (47,358 posts)
26. Ah, you were referring to puglistics.
|
Excepte that phrase is rarely heard outside hospital wards, psychiatric wards to be specific, and never in a boxing ring.
I repeat: That's a bigoted statement. Own it or disavow it. |
Response to rug (Reply #26)
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 01:13 PM
cbayer (120,012 posts)
27. It's not heard in psychiatric wards either. It would be arrogant to dismiss anyone in such a way,
|
particularly a psychiatric patient.
I also object to it's use here. |
Response to rug (Reply #26)
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 01:28 PM
trotsky (33,013 posts)
28. So, are you calling me a bigot?
|
Do a Google search on the phrase. Tell me what you find to be the most common uses of it.
Then come back here tell me what you think I am. You're trying to squelch debate because you've lost again, and I'm not letting you play that game. |
Response to rug (Reply #22)
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 01:29 PM
Rob H. (4,191 posts)
29. It's widely used in forensics (as in debate, not criminal science) tournaments
|
I've always assumed that's what people mean when they use it here.
|
Response to Rob H. (Reply #29)
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 01:32 PM
cbayer (120,012 posts)
30. It was described by a frequent poster here as something he learned while
|
working in a psych unit. He has said that once it becomes clear who is the psych patient, rounds are over.
While it may be used differently elsewhere, he is the one who introduced it and defined it here. It's offensive. |
Response to cbayer (Reply #30)
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 01:50 PM
trotsky (33,013 posts)
31. And that's their business. I'm not using it that way here.
|
And to attempt to silence someone by implying they ARE using it in an offensive way is dishonest and disrespectful.
Take me at my word, and I'll do the same for you. |
Response to rug (Original post)
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 06:18 PM
madrchsod (55,742 posts)
6. here`s the laws and rulings....
Response to rug (Original post)
Thu Aug 2, 2012, 11:01 PM
dimbear (5,134 posts)
32. City fathers of Steubenville bow to civil rights request............
Response to dimbear (Reply #32)
Thu Aug 2, 2012, 11:10 PM
cbayer (120,012 posts)
33. Thanks for the follow up. These cases have been really interesting.
Response to dimbear (Reply #32)
Thu Aug 2, 2012, 11:21 PM
rug (47,358 posts)
34. I don't see the FFRF announcing that.
|
This is their most recent press release:
http://ffrf.org/news/releases/ffrf-cautions-steubenville-not-to-be-duped-by-religious-right-offers/ This is the story a day earlier: Steubenville puts logo change on hold http://www.cantonrep.com/newsnow/x521646526/Steubenville-puts-logo-change-on-hold Is the Christian Post reporting the earlier decision, to change the logo, which was put on hold? I don't see FFRF failing to announce this. |

