Religion
Related: About this forumPope Francis Erects and Fortifies Walls
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/warren-j-blumenfeld/pope-francis-erects-walls_b_9266746.html"Basing itself upon Sacred Scripture, which presents homosexual acts as acts of grave depravity, tradition has always declared that homosexual acts are gravely disordered. They are contrary to natural law. They close the sexual act to the gift of love [i.e., children]. They do not proceed from a genuine affective and sexual complementarity. Under no circumstances can they be approved."
...
Francis reinforced his Church-imposed wall in front of more than 1,000 families in the Philippines during a recent trip when he warned that "[t]he family is threatened by growing efforts on the part of some to redefine the very institution of marriage, by relativism, by the culture of the ephemeral, by a lack of openness to life." These forces, he said, are attempting the "ideological colonization of the family." Among other forces, this was also a reference to marriage for same-sex couples.
The Pope laid extra rows of bricks and mortar with his swipe at LGBTQ people at another weekly Vatican audience when he gave his unqualified blessing to a Slovakian referendum outlawing same-sex unions and adoption rights for same-sex couples. He proclaimed: "I greet the pilgrims from Slovakia and, through them, I wish to express my appreciation to the entire Slovak church, encouraging everyone to continue their efforts in defense of the family, the vital cell of society."
So El Papa has hardened and extended the already unfathomable Catholic walls by denying LGBTQ people (his "children" the rights of marriage and adoption and to their sexuality and gender identities and expressions; denying them the benefits, privileges, and responsibilities of legalized partnerships and families; and denying them the right to be named and serve as godparents. How "Christian" is this?
RKP5637
(67,107 posts)LGBT!!!
stone space
(6,498 posts)skepticscott
(13,029 posts)Try another shot
stone space
(6,498 posts)Try another shot
There is no need for that here.
This is the Religion Forum.
skepticscott
(13,029 posts)It's a metaphor. Your post was not directly relevant to the OP.
What is that really bothers you about that post?
trotsky
(49,533 posts)He's just firing blanks again.
stone space
(6,498 posts)This is the Religion forum.
skepticscott
(13,029 posts)And seriously, dude...look at your sig line. You're carrying guns into every room you post in. If you don't like the subject trotted out in places other than the Gungeon, then don't thrust your opinions on guns into everyone else's face.
stone space
(6,498 posts)And how does my sigfile excuse gun trolling?
skepticscott
(13,029 posts)by "gun trolling"? And you seem to be complaining that guns are being mentioned in the Religion Forum, when they are plastered all over YOUR sig line. Can't have it both ways, dude. Can't have A and ~A
stone space
(6,498 posts)Do you seriously not know the difference between a sigfile and a DU comment?
skepticscott
(13,029 posts)has nothing to do with guns? If it has nothing to do with anything, why is it there?
stone space
(6,498 posts)Are you one of those Code Pink haters?
skepticscott
(13,029 posts)about the introduction of guns into a discussion in the Religion Forum, not me, dude. Look in the mirror.
stone space
(6,498 posts)If you don't have an answer, that's fine, but there's no need for you to change the subject.
Why are you attacking me over my sigfile?
Do you hate Code Pink or something?
skepticscott
(13,029 posts)You complained about guns being discussed in Religion. Your sig line is about guns. Your sig line is in Religion. How many times do you need that answer?
stone space
(6,498 posts)Why is my sigfile an issue for you here in this thread?
I haven't been complaining about your sigfile, have I?
Maybe you should just stop harassing people over their sigfiles.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)stone space
(6,498 posts)This is the Religion Forum.
skepticscott
(13,029 posts)when you don't even know what you mean by that.