Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
Thu Dec 18, 2014, 02:00 PM Dec 2014

The possible 2015 landing spots for Jay Cutler

If the Chicago Bears were willing to bench Jay Cutler for Jimmy Clausen, it seems like anything is on the table for the Bears and Cutler going forward.

The Bears made a mistake signing Cutler to a massive contract this past offseason, and now they might try to get out from that mistake by trading him. The good news for the Bears is there are always general managers and coaches in the NFL on the hot seat, willing to make a bad move in a self-serving attempt to save their own jobs. If Cutler doesn’t work out in 2015, it won’t be their problem in 2016 anyway.

If the Bears trade Cutler, it will be just a $4 million cap hit for them with $12.5 million in 2015 cap savings, according to OverTheCap.com. The team trading for Cutler would take on his $15.5 million in guaranteed 2015 salary and also a likely $16 million in guarantees, according to OverTheCap.com, but again – some desperate GM won’t really care about that. OverTheCap.com said if the Bears cut Cutler, he will still count $19.5 million against their 2015 salary cap, so that’s not realistic.

So which team might let the Bears off the hook when it comes to what might be the NFL’s worst contract? Let’s take a look at Cutler's possible teams for 2015:

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown-corner/the-possible-2015-landing-spots-for-jay-cutler-144721467.html

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The possible 2015 landing spots for Jay Cutler (Original Post) joeybee12 Dec 2014 OP
On his back? KamaAina Dec 2014 #1
On his a** joeybee12 Dec 2014 #2
The Saints? marmar Dec 2014 #3
Hah! joeybee12 Dec 2014 #4
Rams would be a scary fit JonLP24 Dec 2014 #5
I'd like to see him go to Washington... joeybee12 Dec 2014 #6
Uhmm... Washington is where players who end up there get ruined completely!! madinmaryland Dec 2014 #7
That's the point! joeybee12 Dec 2014 #8
Prediction ProfessorGAC Dec 2014 #9
+1. Can't blame it on Cutler. Marc Trestman has a history of failure in the NFL. Auggie Dec 2014 #10
Agreed ProfessorGAC Dec 2014 #11

ProfessorGAC

(65,042 posts)
9. Prediction
Fri Dec 19, 2014, 09:37 AM
Dec 2014

Cutler stays in Chicago. The braintrust is cleared out. Only meatballs think that their dreadful performance will change with a different quarterback, unless it's Manning, Brady and Rodgers, and even though only somewhat.

The defense is horrible and special teams are dreadful.

Even some of you guys are acting like meatballs on this. Why isn't anybody talking about the Allen contract? The Bears actually won 3 games this year BECAUSE OF Cutler. Jared Allen has been useless this year and he's getting paid a ton.

They didn't move on from Briggs and Tillman when it was obvious they're toast.

The O-Line is still marginal at best (an upgrade from horrible the last 2 seasons).

This is a desperation move of coaching and management trying to save face in the light of a bunch of meatball fans who think the QB is the real problem.

One need not be an expert on football to see that losing 2 games in a row when scoring 27 or more points is a defense and special teams issue.

Auggie

(31,169 posts)
10. +1. Can't blame it on Cutler. Marc Trestman has a history of failure in the NFL.
Fri Dec 19, 2014, 12:40 PM
Dec 2014

Besides, with that contract who would possibly sign Cutler?

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Sports»The possible 2015 landing...