Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unhappycamper

(60,364 posts)
Fri Mar 28, 2014, 08:10 AM Mar 2014

General's sentence in sex case called a 'shock,' 'beyond disappointing' (+video)

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Military/2014/0320/General-s-sentence-in-sex-case-called-a-shock-beyond-disappointing-video

Brig. Gen. Jeffrey Sinclair received no jail time or demotion in rank despite having a long-standing affair with a captain under his command and inappropriate relationships with three junior soldiers.

General's sentence in sex case called a 'shock,' 'beyond disappointing' (+video)
By Anna Mulrine, Staff writer / March 20, 2014

WASHINGTON

The outcome of a trial that was widely regarded as a litmus test for how the US military handles sexual assault in its ranks has caused an outcry among lawmakers and advocates of victims of sexual assault – as well as many long-serving military officers.

Brig. Gen. Jeffrey Sinclair, accused of sexual assault, on Thursday received what was widely regarded as a light sentence, consisting of a $20,000 fine and an official reprimand.

The general had pleaded guilty to having a long-standing affair with a captain under his command and having inappropriate relationships with three other junior soldiers. Earlier in the week the Army dropped sexual assault charges, citing what the judge (an Army colonel) reportedly believed were questions about unreliability in the victim's testimony and “undue command influence” in moving the charges forward.

~snip~

Although he pleaded guilty to “maltreatment of a subordinate, having inappropriate relationships with and soliciting illicit pictures from junior female officers, possessing pornography, misuse of a credit card and using derogatory language,” Representative Tsongas noted, he did not receive any jail time or reduction in rank as part of the sentence.
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
General's sentence in sex case called a 'shock,' 'beyond disappointing' (+video) (Original Post) unhappycamper Mar 2014 OP
I call it "business as usual" when the crime has already been exposed. bemildred Mar 2014 #1
was in the car handmade34 Mar 2014 #2
Ugh. MannyGoldstein Mar 2014 #3
Have to give our brave warriors total immunity. Downwinder Mar 2014 #4
Once the sexual assault charge was dropped, prison time was highly unlikely. Geoff R. Casavant Mar 2014 #5
His pension won't be affected by much, if any. Angleae Mar 2014 #6
True, but I recall there used to be a provision . . . Geoff R. Casavant Mar 2014 #7

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
1. I call it "business as usual" when the crime has already been exposed.
Fri Mar 28, 2014, 08:16 AM
Mar 2014

Otherwise, it's just ignored and the victim punished for speaking up.

handmade34

(22,756 posts)
2. was in the car
Fri Mar 28, 2014, 08:20 AM
Mar 2014

listening to the radio when I heard the sentencing... my partner had to listen to me rant for 100 miles down the road... all people (especially women) should be livid!!

Geoff R. Casavant

(2,381 posts)
5. Once the sexual assault charge was dropped, prison time was highly unlikely.
Fri Mar 28, 2014, 11:32 AM
Mar 2014

The remaining charges, alas, are traditionally viewed as not as serious.

It's been a long time since I did military prosecutions, so I don't know how the conviction will affect other aspects of his career. He will never be promoted, that much is all but certain. He will retire, but it is possible that the conviction will mean he will be administratively reduced in paygrade, leading to a significant loss of pension over his lifespan.

I do not think punitive reduction in rank is allowed for officers. But again, I've been out of this loop for a long time and I am certainly willing to be corrected on that point.

Angleae

(4,482 posts)
6. His pension won't be affected by much, if any.
Fri Mar 28, 2014, 05:53 PM
Mar 2014

Military pensions are calculated based on the average of the last 36 months of base pay. If he reitres immediatly it won't be affected.

Geoff R. Casavant

(2,381 posts)
7. True, but I recall there used to be a provision . . .
Sat Mar 29, 2014, 08:29 PM
Mar 2014

. . . to administratively retire someone at a lower paygrade in the event of misconduct. This is not considered a punitive measure.

So although a brigadier general (paygrade O-7), he could be retired as a colonel (O-6), which would be a significant loss, though an O-6 pension is nothing to sneeze at.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»National Security & Defense»General's sentence in sex...