Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The end of the Civilian AR15. (Original Post) Atypical Liberal Dec 2012 OP
I doubt it bossy22 Dec 2012 #1
I do not know that that is true. Atypical Liberal Dec 2012 #9
There is so much bad info from the event, that I am not sure what to believe ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2012 #14
A magazine capacity ban would accomplish little as magazines can be changed quickly. ... spin Dec 2012 #12
An excellent point discntnt_irny_srcsm Dec 2012 #13
I wouldn't bet on it. nt rDigital Dec 2012 #2
Welcome back n/t shadowrider Dec 2012 #3
Thanks : ). nt rDigital Dec 2012 #7
It didn't figure into today's spree. jeepnstein Dec 2012 #4
You're attempting to apply logic while people are still in "venting" mode slackmaster Dec 2012 #5
Yup. X_Digger Dec 2012 #8
Damn, I wish but I doubt it :( southern_belle Dec 2012 #6
I doubt it. Tuesday Afternoon Dec 2012 #10
I don't think so. rrneck Dec 2012 #11
Very doubtful ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2012 #15
I think the look will be like a hunting rifle, scope and all. Eleanors38 Dec 2012 #16
That will make Ruger very happy. krispos42 Dec 2012 #17

bossy22

(3,547 posts)
1. I doubt it
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 09:36 PM
Dec 2012

IIRC the AR-15 wasnt used in the shooting today. It was found in the trunk of the asshole's car

On edit: I think you may see an end of the "high" capacity ammunition magazines. IF i bill goes to congress there is going to have to be compromise to get the republican house to go for it (not mention the senate as well). I think the compromise would end up with no guns being banned but a magazine limit being placed. I do not think though that limit would be at 10- my guess is it would be at 15

 

Atypical Liberal

(5,412 posts)
9. I do not know that that is true.
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 10:24 PM
Dec 2012

I have read today that .223 cases were found at the crime scene.

I have also read that the shooter did not die on the scene but his body was found in a nearby house.

I don't know if any of this is true or not but if it is he may have shot and left the scene with the AR.

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)
14. There is so much bad info from the event, that I am not sure what to believe
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 11:33 PM
Dec 2012

about what was used etc. That will firm up over the next few days. Its important detail for the forthcoming debates but not relevant to the mourning.

spin

(17,493 posts)
12. A magazine capacity ban would accomplish little as magazines can be changed quickly. ...
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 11:03 PM
Dec 2012

and in all fairness a lower capacity magazine is of en more reliable than a hi-cap magazine.

However the gun control side does not realize or even care to learn facts about firearm technology. they might feel that passing a ban on hi-cap magazines was a great accomplishment. In all reality some compromises may have to be made. It would be a shame to pass a foolish "feel good" law but that might be an end result.

I see no significant problem with banning the production of new magazines with a capacity of more than your suggested 15 rounds, however there are plenty of standard 20 and 30 round magazines already available and currently owned by civilians.

Some will disagree with me but the fact is that the majority of mass murders committed by mentally insane individuals on large groups of innocent victims does occur in gun free zones. Any area designated as being gun free should have adequate security to deter the shooter from planning such an attack and possibly stop him if he does launch his attack.

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,483 posts)
13. An excellent point
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 11:21 PM
Dec 2012
"...the majority of mass murders committed by mentally insane individuals on large groups of innocent victims does occur in gun free zones."


I watch a news clip featuring an interview with former FBI profiler Clint Van Zandt. He said nearly the same thing, in nearly the same words. These guys arm up and head for somewhere to shoot unarmed defenseless folks.

These mental cases are ignored often by families in denial and they plan mayhem so they can go out in a blaze of glory just like they see in a movie or video game. If they could get no guns they'd be learning chemistry and explosives on line or something else.

We need to ban gun free zones.

jeepnstein

(2,631 posts)
4. It didn't figure into today's spree.
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 09:45 PM
Dec 2012

The shooter didn't use one. It had absolutely nothing to do with the evil he committed.

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
5. You're attempting to apply logic while people are still in "venting" mode
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 09:50 PM
Dec 2012

There will be a time for that, later.

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)
15. Very doubtful
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 11:35 PM
Dec 2012

CA faced an unparalleled amount of social disobedience with its original registration scheme. This would be worse.

I can legally build my own AR with an unregisterable lower frame. There would be no records whatsoever.

 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
16. I think the look will be like a hunting rifle, scope and all.
Sat Dec 15, 2012, 02:35 AM
Dec 2012

Possibly, they will fall below the ascetic radar of controllers until some celebropunk uses it in future mayhem, and another round of "bans."

There is a way to seriously address school shootings directly: Obama should fund and pass a Safe Schools Act to privide two or more armed security at each school. School districts can take the funds, or develop their own trained & armed teacher program, or stay with what we had today.

krispos42

(49,445 posts)
17. That will make Ruger very happy.
Sat Dec 15, 2012, 10:20 AM
Dec 2012

You might well be right; as my recent debate with a relatively clueless member in Meta showed, they don't know, they don't want to know, they don't think knowing is needed, and they're proud they don't know.



So even though the crime was committed with two handguns that were legal before, during, and after the 1994 AWB, we have to ban assault weapons.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»The end of the Civilian A...