Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Can a state prevent one method of carry (concealed or open) and still comply (Original Post) Eleanors38 Oct 2012 OP
I just love it rrneck Oct 2012 #1
Ironically that's what got CCW introduced to Ohio Reasonable_Argument Oct 2012 #2
There is no right to concealed carry. Warren Stupidity Oct 2012 #3
I agree that open carry is more in line with "keep and bear arms" hack89 Oct 2012 #4
I actually agree on this point Reasonable_Argument Oct 2012 #5
Ummm... no, they can most certainly NOT "stop you and see what's up"... PavePusher Oct 2012 #8
True Reasonable_Argument Oct 2012 #11
Sorry if I seemed a bit sharpish. PavePusher Oct 2012 #12
So work on getting rid of prohibitions on open carry 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #6
Yes there is - Except in places where it has been regulated or prohibited slackmaster Oct 2012 #7
right. There is no enumerated right to concealed carry. Warren Stupidity Oct 2012 #9
A right need not be enumerated in order for it to exist. slackmaster Oct 2012 #10

rrneck

(17,671 posts)
1. I just love it
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 11:13 AM
Oct 2012

when we try to regulate how people look. It just reaffirms my faith in rational, civilized government.

Er, sorry about the sarcasm. Carry on.

 
2. Ironically that's what got CCW introduced to Ohio
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 11:17 AM
Oct 2012

The Ohio Supreme Court ruled that there was no need for concealed carry because open carry of firearms was guaranteed in the Ohio constitution. So then many many groups got together and started open carry rallies. This bothered so many people that they introduced the concealed carry bill that was passed in 2004. In an irony that made the anti gun people spit nails they inadvertently made Ohio a constitutional open carry state and a shall issue concealed carry state.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
4. I agree that open carry is more in line with "keep and bear arms"
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 12:43 PM
Oct 2012

but it makes some people uncomfortable. So if you ban open carry you have to provide an alternative. Society decided concealed carry was that alternative.

 
5. I actually agree on this point
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 12:59 PM
Oct 2012

Open carry is protected by the 2nd amendment. If you openly carry a weapon the police can stop you and see what's up in a polite and professional manner. When you conceal a weapon you take away that ability so you must under go a background check to make sure you're not a criminal before you carry a hidden weapon. I have no issue with that at all.

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
8. Ummm... no, they can most certainly NOT "stop you and see what's up"...
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 02:32 PM
Oct 2012

unless they have sufficient cause to do so (i.e. suspicion/evidence of actual criminal action or intent). The Courts have long ago stated that mere exercise of a Constitutional RIght was NOT justification for a police stop.

I don't remember the case cites, I'll try to find them.

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
12. Sorry if I seemed a bit sharpish.
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 11:05 PM
Oct 2012

That meme is unfortunately alive and well, but I intend to kick it to death within my life-time.

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
6. So work on getting rid of prohibitions on open carry
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 01:06 PM
Oct 2012

Consider: you have a right to vote. It doesn't mention how. Could be mail-in. Could be at an actual voting booth.
If the state get's rid of one and leaves the other that is a limitation on your rights but you still kind of have one.

If they decide physically voting is unnecessary, ban it then start talking about how the constitution never explicitly covers mail in voting that would be a bit concerning eh?

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
9. right. There is no enumerated right to concealed carry.
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 05:16 PM
Oct 2012

It is not in the same class as the right to keep and bear arms.

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
10. A right need not be enumerated in order for it to exist.
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 06:02 PM
Oct 2012
Amendment IX

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.



It is not in the same class as the right to keep and bear arms.

I believe Warren Stupidity has just disparaged a right that belongs to the people.
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Can a state prevent one m...