Mon Sep 3, 2012, 08:57 PM
Tuesday Afternoon (56,910 posts)
209. clarification: Are you saying that someone could start a thread in GC&RKBA and open
nominations for co-hosts who would basically serve Under Krispos? They can act independently but, they can also be Fired by Krispos at any time, right?
cbayer (110,780 posts)
211. Correct. One caveat, he would have to appoint them initially.
Not just anyone could take the job at will. But he can fire them for any reason at any time.
If you have more than one host, there is a rank. Host #1 can fire anyone under him/her. Host #2 can fire anyone under them. Etc.
Once you have more than one host, any of them can appoint others to serve under them, but everyone from the lead host on down can fire anyone below them. The only requirement for becoming a host is that you have to have posted in the group at some point.
Am I explaining it ok?
Tuesday Afternoon (37,673 posts)
213. good enough. I am OK with Krispos "appointing" someone but, then if that someone appoints
another Anti2Aer and so on and so on . . . I could see where a problem might arise.
I am for taking this one day at a time. I leave this up to Krispos. If anyone disagrees then, I think Now would be as good a time as any to Speak Up . . . .
for context refer to: http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1240&pid=139805
3 replies, 918 views
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
209. clarification: Are you saying that someone could start a thread in GC&RKBA and open (Original post)
|Tuesday Afternoon||Sep 2012||OP|
|Tuesday Afternoon||Sep 2012||#1|
|Tuesday Afternoon||Sep 2012||#3|