Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forum10 shot, 3 dead, on South and West sides (Gun free paradise of Chicago)
Three people died and seven others were wounded in shootings Friday night and Saturday morning on the South and West sides, police said.
Half of the people wounded were shot within blocks of 71st Street and Racine Avenue, on the south end of the Englewood neighborhood and north end of the Gresham neighborhood.
A 21-year-old woman was shot and killed on the 3900 block of West 19th Street in the Lawndale neighborhood about 4:33 a.m., police said. She was taken to Mount Sinai Hospital, where she was pronounced dead, police said. As of 6:10 a.m., the Cook County medical examiner's office was not notified of the death. Police didn't provide any other details about that shooting.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/chi-man-shot-in-head-on-south-side-20120413,0,4044709.story
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)doesn't acknowledge ,or recognize .If weeding out vipers like this will save Thousands from being victimized , we should step up background checks and penalties for illegal guns ,or were You thinking more Guns is the answer ?
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)Illinois has a licensing system, Chicago has a complete ban. Interstate sales without a federal license is against federal law. The answer is much more complex.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)Positively complicated , and I wouldn't presume too know the one of a million answers ,and I'm not for banning guns.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)5 policemen shot, one dead in drug bust gone bad in Greenland. Shooter also dead.
2 people dead from gunshots in apparent murder/suicide in Dalton.
1 nine year old boy shot in head in Hollis, status unknown.
I'm sure you had a point about gun control, I just don't know what it was.
pipoman
(16,038 posts)but for me it just reinforces the statistical evidence that gun laws and lawful possession rates have little to nothing to do with crime and violence.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)would the weapon of choice just be something else if the nation weren't wash in guns? Probably. But it is really hard to deny that the staggering number of guns in this country has something with the fact that there are so many gun crimes.
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,479 posts)Less than 5% of the people in the world live here in the US. They own almost 40% of the world's firearms.
There isn't a respectful way to change that.
I also don't think those assaulted with knives or clubs feel better about that.
Those injured or killed with weapons other than firearms matter just a much and their assailants are just as anti-social.
pipoman
(16,038 posts)with guns would increase incrementally with rises in gun numbers...they don't and haven't, they've actually gone down for quite a few years.
beevul
(12,194 posts)(edited to make it current)
Chicagotribune is just a mouthpiece for gun lovers...and...and...PDFs are corrupted by the gun industry...and...and...bullet hoses...and...assault clips...and...theyre the choice of criminals and gangbangers...and the nra...and...and...50 bmg rifles will shoot down aircraft in flight...and are a danger to satellites...and...and...you love guns because your "lacking" below the waist...and...the nra...and...and...gun idolatry...and...yup...yup...and...lunatic asswipes...and...and...chuck norries TM...and...and...pistols in your pants...and...the nra...and...festooned with firearms...and...and...promenading publicly with guns...and...and...we need reasonable restrictions...and...republicans suck but republican paul helmke and sara brady are great...and...the nra...and...glock handguns aren't suited for hunting or self defense...and...and...FIFTY CALIBER TERROR...and...and...a well regulated militia...and...walter mitty wannabes...and...and...the nra...and...your all zimmermans...and...rude baser toters...and...a gun tucked in your pants...and...backlash...and...its virginias fault...and...long live mayor 1 percent...and...the gunnerhood...and...
I wonder if the gun control pushers hereabouts would like to talk to the people of Chicago, and explain why one of the last real strongholds of gun control...the shining beacon of gun control utopia...continues to fail them. Without shifting the blame.
My sympathies to the families of those killed.
Turbineguy
(37,324 posts)gun control laws are the last thing you need. Gun control is for a country that's moving up, not down.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)Violent crime rates in both Chicago and NYC have been trending down for quite some time, as they have been nationally, independent of gun control policy or the lack thereof.
beevul
(12,194 posts)Ever heard of Adrian Schoolcraft?
Meet Adrian Schoolcraft. Meet the Real NYPD.
Adrian Schoolcraft says he isn't exactly sure when, but at some point he had decided that it was important to document the orders that he was given that he thought were out of line. He recorded roll calls where officers were constantly being told to do more stop-and-frisks, even though it's illegal to stop a random person on the street and frisk them without reasonable suspicion. In December 2008, a sergeant tells officers to stop-and-frisk quote, "anybody walking around, no matter what the explanation is." He recorded Stephen Mauriello, the commander the 81st precinct-- and the person Adrian Schoolcraft says really brought the hammer down for higher numbers-- ordering the officers to arrest everyone they see. This happens in a couple of recordings, like this one from Halloween 2008.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/03/20/1075995/-Meet-Adrian-Schoolcraft-Meet-the-Real-NYPD-
http://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/414/transcript
The NYPD Tapes Confirmed
The report police hid for nearly two years that corroborates a Voice investigation and vindicates a whistle-blower the NYPD tried to destroy
For more than two years, Adrian Schoolcraft secretly recorded every roll call at the 81st Precinct in Brooklyn and captured his superiors urging police officers to do two things in order to manipulate the "stats" that the department is under pressure to produce: Officers were told to arrest people who were doing little more than standing on the street, but they were also encouraged to disregard actual victims of serious crimes who wanted to file reports.
In October 2009, Schoolcraft met with NYPD investigators for three hours and detailed more than a dozen cases of crime reports being manipulated in the district. Three weeks after that meetingwhich was supposed to have been kept secret from Schoolcraft's superiorshis precinct commander and a deputy chief ordered Schoolcraft to be dragged from his apartment and forced into the Jamaica Hospital psychiatric ward for six days.
In the wake of our series, NYPD commissioner Raymond Kelly ordered an investigation into Schoolcraft's claims. By June 2010, that investigation produced a report that the department has tried to keep secret for nearly two years.
The Voice has obtained that 95-page report, and it shows that the NYPD confirmed Schoolcraft's allegations. In other words, at the same time that police officials were attacking Schoolcraft's credibility, refusing to pay him, and serving him with administrative charges, the NYPD was sitting on a document that thoroughly vindicated his claims.
"When viewed in their totality, a disturbing pattern is prevalent and gives credence to the allegation that crimes are being improperly reported in order to avoid index-crime classifications," investigators concluded. "This trend is indicative of a concerted effort to deliberately underreport crime in the 81st Precinct."
http://www.villagevoice.com/2012-03-07/news/the-nypd-tapes-confirmed/
Read the entire article, and the background on it, and where the orders to underreport came from, then tell me if you REALLY think thats the only precinct this BS was happening in.
As to chicago...it remains a mystery how one of the few places that have nearly everything gun control supporters want, has so much more gun crime than so many places that dont - IF gun control really works.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)Crime rates have been trending down since the early 90s. That trend is independent of gun control policy. What is driving the numbers is a matter of debate, in general 'stat cooking' is not considered a serious factor.
sarisataka
(18,633 posts)More gun control?
By your admission gun control has not helped the crime rate either way so why do we need to increase controls? Is not that the usually stated goal, to reduce crime?
DonP
(6,185 posts)Violent crime might have been trending down for a while here, but for the first 3 months of 2012 gun crime and murders are up 60% over last year. That's not a statistical anomaly at that rate, and Summer is the highest crime period.
In the meantime ... Rahm is writing big ass checks to pay Alan Gura his the legal fees for losing the McDonald case and he's still fighting allowing the law abiding to own guns in their own homes. He is also refusing to meet with the police union to negotiate their contract and allowing the total number of police to decline through retirements. So you can't protect yourself and there won't be enough cops to help out either.
If anyone wants to know what the actual street cops and union members think, check out the 2nd citycop blog spot. It's run by street cops and the comment section will let you know how "highly" they think of Rahm's attitude toward gun crimes.
fightthegoodfightnow
(7,042 posts)Why do you think gun controls are needed?
Right...you don't.
Rural non populated areas may not see gun violence. Urban areas often do.
Things in Chiago would be far worse without gun control.
beevul
(12,194 posts)"Why do you think gun controls are needed? Right...you don't."
Sheer speculation. Now tell me what I think of spaghetti, and where I stand on animal rescues, while your at it. I mean, if you're going to make things up out of whole cloth, why not, eh?
"Things in Chiago would be far worse without gun control."
Sheer speculation.
Do go ahead and list similar sized population centers with less gun control, and more gun problems.
We'll wait right here.
fightthegoodfightnow
(7,042 posts)...if things were SOOOOOO much better before gun control why is it the vast majority of those living in Chicago continue to support................gun control.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)There are a number of reasons if they do. Assuming Chicago did not ban handguns, would these shooters apply for an Illinois FOID to buy one? Seriously?
fightthegoodfightnow
(7,042 posts)Tell us why they support gun control.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)too many in the working and middle class thought Bush was "one of us", too much Rush (not the band) or something like it. For the same reason most Faux viewers think Iraq had NBC weapons.
People listen to conventional wisdom without ever really examining it. Everyone is for gun control. Do they approve of the degree that that exists in Chicago.
So, are gangsters applying for FOIDs and buying their guns down state?
fightthegoodfightnow
(7,042 posts)Is your point we need a national gun control policy?
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)Federal law prohibits going across a state line to a gun store. Even if you get the ban, the gun trafficking routes will match the drug routes like they do in Europe. Before Nixon's WOD, the gangs could not afford guns, legal or not. They used tire chains, home made zip guns, and knives. This was also true of the Mafia before the Volstead Act. Remember, this was before Gun Control Act of 1968 (and could order one from a catalog and the gun comes to your house) and California's gun laws were not that much different than Wyoming's. What changed was the profits in the drug business, thanks to Dick's WOD. Best way to take away guns away from gangs is to take away their money.
bowens43
(16,064 posts)the federal government has failed them by not banning ALL handguns and ammunition.
If anything this is a strong argument to greatly expand gun control.
A total or near total ban on guns and ammunition is what is needed.
Your sympathies ? Seriously? LOL!
They don't need your sympathy, they need the fucking guns off the streets.
beevul
(12,194 posts)You aren't going to get your gun ban.
"Banning them didn't work, so we have to ban them more, that will work."
I'm sure a federal ban would work almost as well as the federal ban on cocaine.
Yeah, thats it.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)"A total or near total ban on guns and ammunition is what is needed."
You do realize that any serious attempt to enforce such a thing would end in massive civil unrest and violence, right?
hack89
(39,171 posts)shadowrider
(4,941 posts)Unless of course all the cops lose their weapons too. Unless you don't want that.
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,479 posts)...the feds don't own a national time machine. Next.
rl6214
(8,142 posts)Shares?
Anything else you want while you are king for the day
burf
(1,164 posts)worked out really well for Chicago and DC when the matters got to the Supreme Court. How much of the money that Chicago spent on attorneys could have been spent on getting more cops on the street or some other crime prevention?
oneshooter
(8,614 posts)"A total or near total ban on guns and ammunition is what is needed."
shadowrider
(4,941 posts)Just have the Canadian and Mexican armies go house to house and confiscate them.
bowens43
(16,064 posts)these shootings would not have happened. This is a very strong argument for a total nationwide ban on hand guns and all ammunition. Even in the case of hunting, all ammo should be strictly regulated and only available in limited quantities during the hunting season. All ammo not used should be returned when the season ends.
AH1Apache
(502 posts)Or are you just another keyboard kommando who just bitches and moans but does nothing?
Teh stupid, it hurts.
The 10's of thousands who load their own ammo?
rrneck
(17,671 posts)discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,479 posts)...maybe he IS THE WIZARD!
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)but their murder rate is still 6 times ours. Jamaica Did basically what you propose they still make Russia look like Singapore.
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,479 posts)Give my regards to the wizard.
Callisto32
(2,997 posts)Along with a ban on comparatively ancient technology.
That's completely reasonable!
oneshooter
(8,614 posts)ileus
(15,396 posts)movonne
(9,623 posts)gun control is o.k.???? do you think there should be some gun control?? explain what gun control means...
AH1Apache
(502 posts)how many more do you want? How about those existing laws start getting enforce first before we even think about any new laws.
I'm fine with what we already have as long as it doesn't infringe on the law abiding citizens.
madrchsod
(58,162 posts)it`s also happening in no gun control near suburbs and 100 miles away from the city.
i noticed a problem with those who think because chicago restricts gun possession the crime rate is soaring. maybe more cops on the streets,crack down on the gangs and their wars over street corners,and finding jobs would be a better solution than arming every citizen in chicago.
burf
(1,164 posts)the gangs to go outta business.
Gangs and Politicians in Chicago: An Unholy Alliance
LAWBREAKERS, LAWMAKERS: In some parts of Chicago, violent street gangs and pols quietly trade money and favors for mutual gain. The thugs flourish, the elected officials thriveand you lose.
http://www.chicagomag.com/Chicago-Magazine/January-2012/Gangs-and-Politicians-An-Unholy-Alliance/index.php?cparticle=1&siarticle=0
saras
(6,670 posts)shadowrider
(4,941 posts)However, that only applies to the law abiding. The bad guys have all the guns they want.
fightthegoodfightnow
(7,042 posts)If they own a gun, they are not law abiding.
What's your problem with those who obey the law?
shadowrider
(4,941 posts)and they obey the law, thus, law-abiding.
Can you show me where I said I have a problem with them?
fightthegoodfightnow
(7,042 posts)The law applies to EVERYONE.