Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rdharma

(6,057 posts)
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 10:06 PM Apr 2013

An Examination of the NRA’s “National School Shield” Proposal

American Journal of Criminal Justice
March 2013
The Only Thing That Stops a Guy with a Bad Policy is a Guy with a Good Policy: An Examination of the NRA’s “National School Shield” Proposal

Gordon A. Crews,
Angela D. Crews,
Catherine E. Burton

Abstract


With the recent tragedy at Sandy Hook Elementary in Newtown, CT, the public and the government are looking for solutions to school violence. The National Rifle Association (NRA), a Second Amendment, pro-gun advocacy group, has proposed an “education and training emergency response program” called The National School Shield, which advocates the placement of armed security in schools. Although the program sounds provocative, serious questions complicate its plausibility, necessity, motive, and effectiveness. Furthermore, the potential policy and practical ramifications of encouraging armed security forces in U.S. schools are complex. The authors examined the proposal’s key elements from a public policy perspective and determined that the NRA program would be expensive in terms of both implementation and civil and/or criminal liability, would increase juvenile contact with the criminal justice system, would increase the potential for injuries and deaths from firearms, and would potentially only serve to increase profits for those invested in security industries. More potentially effective and safe policy alternatives are offered.

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12103-013-9202-x#

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
An Examination of the NRA’s “National School Shield” Proposal (Original Post) rdharma Apr 2013 OP
So are you going to spend the $40 to tell us what this paper sylvi Apr 2013 #1
It's perfectly clear as stated in the abstract! rdharma Apr 2013 #2
Abstracts only give the conclusions. Straw Man Apr 2013 #4
No evidence as to how they reached their conclusions sylvi Apr 2013 #5
The crux of the matter krispos42 Apr 2013 #3
 

sylvi

(813 posts)
1. So are you going to spend the $40 to tell us what this paper
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 11:04 PM
Apr 2013

says, or are you a salesperson for Springer?

Straw Man

(6,626 posts)
4. Abstracts only give the conclusions.
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 11:36 PM
Apr 2013

They skip the supporting evidence. You may be willing to take their conclusions on faith, but I'm not.

 

sylvi

(813 posts)
5. No evidence as to how they reached their conclusions
Sun Apr 7, 2013, 12:08 AM
Apr 2013

No statement of what these workable alternative policies are.

They might as well be.......you!



I crack myself up.


krispos42

(49,445 posts)
3. The crux of the matter
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 11:33 PM
Apr 2013

Mass school shootings, despite the corporate media hand-wringing, are very rare events. Putting a a half-million armed guards in 133,000 elementary schools would, likely, not stop a mass shooting, nor reduce the impact of one. However, annual casualties from the accidents and misunderstandings and police over-reaction of having such a force in place would likely exceed any savings from stopping crimes.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»An Examination of the NRA...