Surprise, Surprise: Increased Contraceptive Use Leads to Fewer Unintended Pregnancies

[niyad]

Surprise, Surprise: Increased Contraceptive Use Leads to Fewer Unintended Pregnancies

(definitely one of those NSS moments, or, where is gomer pyle when you need him?))


Who would have guessed? Increased use of contraceptives is accompanied by a decline in abortions and unintended pregnancies, according to a new report from the Guttmacher Institute. Researchers found that women who use birth control methods consistently and correctly make up only 5 percent of unplanned pregnancies.

Other key findings from the report:

The use of long-acting, reversible contraceptives (LARC) methods, such as IUDs, has increased to almost 12 percent of contraceptive users, its highest level ever.
Though only 2.4 percent of contraceptive users depended on LARCs in 2002, that number was 3.7 percent by 2007 and 8.5 percent by 2009, reflecting a rapid growth.
From 2011 to 2013, 90 percent of American women aged 15–44 who did not wish to become pregnant used contraceptives.
LARCs are now the third most commonly used reversible contraceptives, after the pill (26 percent of users) and condoms (15 percent).

And while all of this was happening, the U.S. abortion rate steadily declined 13 percent between 2008 and 2011. Anti-choicers like to credit the decline to increased abortion restrictions at the state level, but this reduction actually predates all of the recent TRAP laws. On top of that, the abortion decline happened alongside a sudden drop in births, proving that pregnancies overall were down.

It’s worth noting that one of the many, many baffling stances of the anti-choice movement is its opposition to various contraceptive methods. If they care so much about reducing the number of abortions, it would be logical to promote the heck out of birth control and family-planning policies that are proven to reduce abortion rates. Right? But no. Anti-choicers consistently oppose women’s access to affordable and safe reproductive care.

. . . . .

http://msmagazine.com/blog/2014/12/15/surprise-surprise-increased-contraceptive-use-leads-to-fewer-unintended-pregnancies/

[TreasonousBastard]

1. Someone got paid for this?

And it's no secret why some (maybe most) anti-abortionists are anti-contraception.

The religious right holds it as a tenet of faith that sex is for reproduction, not fun. Hence, we are to restrict our screwing to Godly limits, and we cannot restrict every sperm's chances of God leading it to an egg. Pregnancy is a Divine gift, bringing new little believers into God's fold, and only God can ordain or interfere with it.

This same sort of thinking, of course, leads fairly directly to why God disapproves of homosexuality-- no chance of babies.

It will be interesting to see if they have any interest in changing the rules now that science has given us so many alternatives for baby-making.

[niyad]

2. I know--I wonder how much this amazing little study cost.

the woman-hating, woman's sexuality hating of the reichwingnutjobs almost boggles the mind.

[TreasonousBastard]

3. I suspect it's not so much hatred but...

fear and jealousy of female sexuality driving them.