Israel/Palestine
Related: About this forumHow Peace Negotiator Martin Indyk Cashed a Big, Fat $14.8 Million Check From Qatar
-snip-
Except, buried deep in the Times epic snoozer was a world-class scoop related to one of the worlds biggest and most controversial storiessomething so startling, and frankly so grotesque, that I have to bring it up again here: Martin Indyk, the man who ran John Kerrys Israeli-Palestinian negotiations, whose failure in turn set off this summers bloody Gaza War, cashed a $14.8 million check from Qatar. Yes, you heard that right: In his capacity as vice president and director of the Foreign Policy Program at the prestigious Brookings Institution, Martin Indyk took an enormous sum of money from a foreign government that, in addition to its well-documented role as a funder of Sunni terror outfits throughout the Middle East, is the main patron of Hamaswhich happens to be the mortal enemy of both the State of Israel and Mahmoud Abbas Fatah party.
But far from trumpeting its big scoop, the Times seems to have missed it entirely, even allowing Indyk to opine that the best way for foreign governments to shape policy is scholarly, independent research, based on objective criteria. Really? It is pretty hard to imagine what the words independent and objective mean coming from a man who while going from Brookings to public service and back to Brookings again pocketed $14.8 million in Qatari cash. At least the Times might have asked Indyk a few follow-up questions, like: Did he cash the check from Qatar before signing on to lead the peace negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians? Did the check clear while he was in Jerusalem, or Ramallah? Or did the Qatari money land in the Brookings account only after Indyk gave interviews and speeches blaming the Israelis for his failure? Well never know now. But whichever way it happened looks pretty awful.
Or maybe the editors decided that it was all on the level, and the money influenced neither Indyks government work on the peace process nor Brookings analysis of the Middle East. Or maybe journalists just dont think its worth making a big fuss out of obvious conflicts of interest that may affect American foreign policy. Maybe Qatars $14.8 million doesnt affect Brookings research projects or what the think tanks scholars tell the media, including the New York Times, about subjects like Qatar, Hamas, Israel, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and other related areas in which Qatar has key interests at stake. Maybe the think tanks vaunted objectivity, and Indyks personal integrity and his pride in his career as a public servant, trump the large piles of vulgar Qatari natural gas money that keep the lights on and furnish the offices of Brookings scholars and pay their cell-phone bills and foreign travel.
But people in the Middle East may be a little less blasé about this kind of behavior than we are. Officials in the Netanyahu government, likely including the prime minister himself, say theyll never trust Indyk again, in part due to the article by Israeli journalist Nahum Barnea in which an unnamed U.S. official with intimate knowledge of the talks, believed to be Indyk, blamed Israel for the failure of the peace talks. Certainly Jerusalem has good reason to be wary of an American diplomat who is also, or intermittently, a highly paid employee of Qatars ruling family. Among other things, Qatar hosts Hamas political chief Khaled Meshaal, the man calling the shots in Hamas war against the Jewish state. Moreover, Doha is currently Hamas chief financial backerwhich means that while Qatar isnt itself launching missiles on Israeli towns, Hamas wouldnt be able to do so without Qatari cash.
Lot more at:
http://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-news-and-politics/184713/martin-indyk-qatar#HYoP26bgxgiH7ezc.01
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)This is all hilarious, given that Indyk is one of the most knee-jerk, reactionary, pro-Israel stooges ever to fall out of AIPAC and into a centrist / neocon "think tank."
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)Looks like allies for Israel are not done condemning Kerry and company.