British Empire's symbolic return
A headline in Britain's sadly decayed newspaper the Daily Telegraph on December 6 was exciting. It announced with pride that "Britain returns 'East of Suez' with permanent Royal Navy base in Gulf", which conjured up imperial memories for many people, including myself, as I was serving in the military at the time of Britain's withdrawal from East of Suez. Indeed I was stationed well to the east of Suez, in that region, according to Rudyard Kipling in the previous century:
where the best is like the worst
Where there ain't no Ten Commandments and a man can raise a thirst.
For the temple bells are ringing and it's there that I would be -
By the old Moulmein pagoda, looking lazy at the sea.
Britain's new base is to be in Bahrain, a feudal fiefdom owned by His Majesty King Hamad ibn Isa Al Khalifa who has about US$5 billion and whose family members are generously represented in his non-elected regime.
The king exercises absolute power over the executive, legislative and judicial arms of government. He appoints cabinet ministers, generals, judges and members of the Consultative Council and is a close ally of the United States which, according to the State Department, considers that "Bahrain plays a key role in regional security architecture and is a vital US partner in defense initiatives". Britain, not to be outdone, declares that it has an "historic and close relationship with Bahrain".
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/MID-01-090115.html