Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
Tue Apr 12, 2016, 07:24 PM Apr 2016

Germany To Abandon $1.1 Trillion Wind Power Program By 2019

Germany To Abandon $1.1 Trillion Wind Power Program By 2019

Germany plans to stop building new wind farms by 2019, gradually turning away from its $1.1 trillion wind power program, according to a Thursday report in Berliner Zeitung.

The government plans to cap the total amount of wind energy at 40 to 45 percent of national capacity, according to the report. By 2019, this policy would cause a massive reduction of 6,000 megawatts of wind power capacity compared to the end of 2015’s capacity.

The government estimates that it will spend over $1.1 trillion financially supporting wind power, even though building wind turbines hasn’t achieved the government’s goal of actually reducing carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions.

Electricity from new wind power is nearly four times as expensive as electricity from existing nuclear power plants, according to analysis from the Institute for Energy Research. The rising cost of subsidies is passed onto ordinary rate-payers, which has triggered complaints that poor households are subsidizing the affluent.

Nuclear power made up 29.5 percent of Germany’s energy in 2000 — in 2015, the share dropped down to 17 percent.
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Germany To Abandon $1.1 Trillion Wind Power Program By 2019 (Original Post) GliderGuider Apr 2016 OP
Very interesting. LiberalArkie Apr 2016 #1
Daily Caller? Eugene Apr 2016 #2
Never mind, it's an old story, covered by a lot of very sketchy sources. GliderGuider Apr 2016 #3
it wouldnt be as cheap if all the externalities of nuclear fuel was taken in account saturnsring Apr 2016 #4
Damn right. Eg., no nuclear power station operator is, according to the accounts, insured Ghost Dog Apr 2016 #5
 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
3. Never mind, it's an old story, covered by a lot of very sketchy sources.
Tue Apr 12, 2016, 08:00 PM
Apr 2016

Last edited Tue Apr 12, 2016, 08:52 PM - Edit history (1)

On edit: But I'm sure those in the know will be along shortly to tell us all the Truth™.

 

Ghost Dog

(16,881 posts)
5. Damn right. Eg., no nuclear power station operator is, according to the accounts, insured
Tue Apr 12, 2016, 09:06 PM
Apr 2016

properly to cover possible cost consequences of serious cockups. Nor is the waste product safe storage &/recycle phase properly costed.

... Not to mention the Security bill...

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Germany To Abandon $1.1 T...