Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Top economists analyze Obama administration's Clean Power Plan
http://news.uchicago.edu/article/2014/11/13/top-economists-analyze-obama-administrations-clean-power-plan[font face=Serif][font size=5]Top economists analyze Obama administration's Clean Power Plan[/font]
By Victoria Ekstrom High
November 13, 2014
[font size=3]An analysis of the Obama administration’s plan for reducing carbon emissions from power plants suggests that while the plan improves flexibility, allowing emissions to be reduced in cost-effective ways, additional reforms could permit further emissions reduction for the least cost.
The Obama administration’s Clean Power Plan, released in June 2014 and seeking public comments until Dec. 1, aims to reduce carbon emissions from existing power plants by 30 percent (below 2005 levels) by 2030. Under the rule, states are required to develop plans to meet specific standards devised by the EPA. In the latest edition of Science, economists from the University of Chicago, Stanford, Yale, Harvard, MIT, and the University of California-Berkeley and Davis have come together to give their take on the plan. Specifically, they assess whether the plan will achieve its intended emissions reductions, and how it can do so in the most cost-effective manner.
“The Clean Power Plan demonstrates that the United States is serious about confronting climate change. It will provide the U.S. with critical leverage in the international climate negotiations next year in Paris,” said Michael Greenstone, one of the authors of the Science analysis and the director of the University of Chicago’s Energy Policy Institute at Chicago (EPIC).
…
The plan offers actions states could take, such as improving the efficiency of power plants, using more natural gas, expanding renewables and creating energy efficiency programs for consumers. It is difficult to know which of these approaches will reduce emissions at the lowest cost. This is why it is so important that the plan also allows states to create regional carbon trading programs. Such regional cap-and-trade systems have worked well in the past in terms of reducing emissions at the lowest cost, the economists say. Several states already use this approach, like the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative in the northeast and California’s Cap-and Trade Program.
…[/font][/font]
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1261349By Victoria Ekstrom High
November 13, 2014
[font size=3]An analysis of the Obama administration’s plan for reducing carbon emissions from power plants suggests that while the plan improves flexibility, allowing emissions to be reduced in cost-effective ways, additional reforms could permit further emissions reduction for the least cost.
The Obama administration’s Clean Power Plan, released in June 2014 and seeking public comments until Dec. 1, aims to reduce carbon emissions from existing power plants by 30 percent (below 2005 levels) by 2030. Under the rule, states are required to develop plans to meet specific standards devised by the EPA. In the latest edition of Science, economists from the University of Chicago, Stanford, Yale, Harvard, MIT, and the University of California-Berkeley and Davis have come together to give their take on the plan. Specifically, they assess whether the plan will achieve its intended emissions reductions, and how it can do so in the most cost-effective manner.
“The Clean Power Plan demonstrates that the United States is serious about confronting climate change. It will provide the U.S. with critical leverage in the international climate negotiations next year in Paris,” said Michael Greenstone, one of the authors of the Science analysis and the director of the University of Chicago’s Energy Policy Institute at Chicago (EPIC).
…
The plan offers actions states could take, such as improving the efficiency of power plants, using more natural gas, expanding renewables and creating energy efficiency programs for consumers. It is difficult to know which of these approaches will reduce emissions at the lowest cost. This is why it is so important that the plan also allows states to create regional carbon trading programs. Such regional cap-and-trade systems have worked well in the past in terms of reducing emissions at the lowest cost, the economists say. Several states already use this approach, like the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative in the northeast and California’s Cap-and Trade Program.
…[/font][/font]
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read
