Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Reposted for discussion here (Original Post) Major Nikon May 2014 OP
Nobody does anything for just one reason. Ever. nt rrneck May 2014 #1
Excellent. n/t lumberjack_jeff May 2014 #2
The best part was the replies to the debunking Major Nikon May 2014 #3
And they call themselves academics. lumberjack_jeff May 2014 #4

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
3. The best part was the replies to the debunking
Sat May 17, 2014, 12:07 AM
May 2014

Q. What is your response to the biological evidence of gender preference in babies?

No, the evidence that debunked our "hypothesis" doesn't change anything.
"I have what you would call a theoretical basis. There is no room for biology in there for me."

Both questioned the researchers motives for debunking them.

Claimed science can't prove them wrong, yet had no basis in science for their "hypothesis".

 

lumberjack_jeff

(33,224 posts)
4. And they call themselves academics.
Sat May 17, 2014, 11:45 AM
May 2014

one of the biggest travesties of the broader phenomenon is their having turned universities into churches, complete with heresy and dogma.

I particularly liked the eyeroll of the Norweigian sociologist early in the program, questioning the reasons for asking the question. This is university! Why are you asking questions!

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Men's Group»Reposted for discussion h...