Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sir pball

(4,741 posts)
Thu Sep 11, 2014, 11:56 PM Sep 2014

Sometimes, sadly, "the camera you have with you" just isn't enough.

I was walking home from work today across 55th Street in Manhattan; when I got to 7th Avenue I had a red light so I looked downtown to see if it was safe to cross...

...after a second of glancing down the dark canyon of 7th Avenue ending in the superficial carnival of light that is Times Square, I caught the barely blue lines of the towers of light spiking off to the infinite darkness of the night sky. Of course I stopped dead and tried to get that ephemeral, amazing, unspeakably moving scene with my phone but there isn't a phone in the world that could catch that almost-invisible trace across the darkness of the sky. I thought "Damn, I knew this was going to happen tonight - I should have packed my DSLR. And the 1.8 lens. And the tripod." Of course even with all my gear, it would have taken a ten-stop bracket and some serious HDR merging to catch it...yet while I'm upset I didn't make a record of the moment, I somehow feel good that it's one of those things that only the eye can see, and only memory can record.

But hot damn it would have been a ringer for the "Lines" contest

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sometimes, sadly, "the camera you have with you" just isn't enough. (Original Post) sir pball Sep 2014 OP
It's not the camera. RandySF Sep 2014 #1
There is a difference, but sometimes it's just too subtle, and then it does become "the camera". nt sir pball Sep 2014 #2
ah yes... handmade34 Sep 2014 #3

RandySF

(58,799 posts)
1. It's not the camera.
Fri Sep 12, 2014, 12:15 AM
Sep 2014

I know what you're talking about, and I think there is a difference between how we see things and how the camera sees them.

sir pball

(4,741 posts)
2. There is a difference, but sometimes it's just too subtle, and then it does become "the camera". nt
Fri Sep 12, 2014, 12:18 AM
Sep 2014
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Photography»Sometimes, sadly, "t...