Photography
Related: About this forumSometimes, sadly, "the camera you have with you" just isn't enough.
I was walking home from work today across 55th Street in Manhattan; when I got to 7th Avenue I had a red light so I looked downtown to see if it was safe to cross...
...after a second of glancing down the dark canyon of 7th Avenue ending in the superficial carnival of light that is Times Square, I caught the barely blue lines of the towers of light spiking off to the infinite darkness of the night sky. Of course I stopped dead and tried to get that ephemeral, amazing, unspeakably moving scene with my phone but there isn't a phone in the world that could catch that almost-invisible trace across the darkness of the sky. I thought "Damn, I knew this was going to happen tonight - I should have packed my DSLR. And the 1.8 lens. And the tripod." Of course even with all my gear, it would have taken a ten-stop bracket and some serious HDR merging to catch it...yet while I'm upset I didn't make a record of the moment, I somehow feel good that it's one of those things that only the eye can see, and only memory can record.
But hot damn it would have been a ringer for the "Lines" contest
RandySF
(58,799 posts)I know what you're talking about, and I think there is a difference between how we see things and how the camera sees them.
sir pball
(4,741 posts)handmade34
(22,756 posts)but often those moments of seeing pure joy can be lost if trying to catch it" with a camera