Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
44 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wow, the Vikings were some seriously tough people! (Original Post) Brigid Mar 2013 OP
You would almost think they would run out of rapists Demo_Chris Mar 2013 #1
In medieval viking-land? Hayabusa Mar 2013 #41
If Viking women are taking them out three at a time... yeah Demo_Chris Mar 2013 #42
Never paid much attention pipi_k Mar 2013 #2
Wouldn't you be tough & nasty if you were freezing your ass off .... Myrina Mar 2013 #3
I live pipi_k Mar 2013 #6
My husband's family also comes from Normandy... a la izquierda Mar 2013 #4
He's lucky pipi_k Mar 2013 #7
Well, I've traced his family back to the 1400s. a la izquierda Mar 2013 #10
How do you pipi_k Mar 2013 #18
I have been able to go way back on ancestry. grasswire Mar 2013 #26
yeah, just the names of some of my ancestors are clues grasswire Mar 2013 #9
One of my favorite beers! OriginalGeek Mar 2013 #15
OMG grasswire Mar 2013 #20
Some of my ancestors on my dad's side . . . Brigid Mar 2013 #23
well, my ancestor was killed by Macbeth. grasswire Mar 2013 #24
Feud time, methinks forsooth! Brigid Mar 2013 #25
can you buy that beer in U.S.? nt grasswire Mar 2013 #21
yes OriginalGeek Mar 2013 #30
the name of the Skull Splitter is Thornfinn Einarsson grasswire Mar 2013 #28
A fun Viking show between 957 and 963 was "Leave It to Skull Cleaver" struggle4progress Mar 2013 #17
Featuring Skull, brother of Walleyed, son of Juneth and Wardlock, Art_from_Ark Mar 2013 #36
Those were such happy days! struggle4progress Mar 2013 #37
A 6-year run was pretty good, considering it was in the same time slot as this popular show: Art_from_Ark Mar 2013 #39
I'm afraid I'd forgotten about that show struggle4progress Mar 2013 #44
Isn't it cool pipi_k Mar 2013 #27
I once saw a photo of a Civil War soldier . . . Brigid Mar 2013 #31
What about ashling Mar 2013 #33
Yeah, being half Norwegian I like to think so Spike89 Mar 2013 #5
She was a shieldmaiden. Xithras Mar 2013 #8
Was?! pokerfan Mar 2013 #16
That is fascinating... Sekhmets Daughter Mar 2013 #19
A pregnant woman wielding a sword??! Yavin4 Mar 2013 #29
yeah, they were, like, a floating hell's angels troupe: struggle4progress Mar 2013 #11
And yet, they haven't won a Super Bowl. Dr. Strange Mar 2013 #12
Maybe they would . . . Brigid Mar 2013 #14
Somebody had to do it! In_The_Wind Mar 2013 #13
Yes, we are. datasuspect Mar 2013 #22
They founded Russia. kwassa Mar 2013 #32
Normans also unified just about all of medieval Italy south of the Papal States cemaphonic Mar 2013 #34
It was more a matter of numbers. Xithras Mar 2013 #35
Yeah, normally I'm a stickler over history vs. mythologizing too, but... cemaphonic Mar 2013 #38
It wasn't the Inuit. Xithras Mar 2013 #40
They were our overlords! many a good man Mar 2013 #43

pipi_k

(21,020 posts)
2. Never paid much attention
Mon Mar 4, 2013, 11:06 AM
Mar 2013

to them until I started doing my genealogy and discovering that some ancestors came from Normandy, which we all know got its name from the Normans...or Norse-men...Vikings.

But yeah...I've been watching some older History channel shows on my iPad and they were some nasty bastards, it seems.

Myrina

(12,296 posts)
3. Wouldn't you be tough & nasty if you were freezing your ass off ....
Mon Mar 4, 2013, 11:45 AM
Mar 2013

.... 9 months out of the year just trying to stay alive? I know I'd be REALLY fucking cranky.

pipi_k

(21,020 posts)
6. I live
Mon Mar 4, 2013, 03:00 PM
Mar 2013

in New England, where it's been said we have 8 months of winter and 4 months of damned poor sledding


And yes...it makes me cranky.



pipi_k

(21,020 posts)
7. He's lucky
Mon Mar 4, 2013, 03:18 PM
Mar 2013

to have been able to trace them that far back.

For years my son was under the impression that my father's family name ended up in England with William the Conqueror, living there for a few hundred years, then perhaps migrating back to France.

Unfortunately, when I did more research on the family name, it appears that it wasn't always what it is now...or what it was when that part of the family arrived in Canada during the mid 1600s. It was a whole different surname, and one of my ancestors took the name of the military unit he was in, which led to a complete changing of the family name to what it is now.

Anyway, that line originated in St Malo, France, which is in Brittany.


Another line...Roussel... came from Normandy. Which makes sense...Roussel = Red = Viking origins.



a la izquierda

(11,807 posts)
10. Well, I've traced his family back to the 1400s.
Mon Mar 4, 2013, 03:51 PM
Mar 2013

They were Earls, so it was pretty easy, once I got back to the 1700s. It also helps that the men tend to have odd, or at least uncommon first names, and some military service. His family has been in America since the 1630s.
I've also traced another line of his family back to 17th century France. That ancestor was expelled as a Hugenot.

I'm a historian, so genealogy is a fun hobby.

pipi_k

(21,020 posts)
18. How do you
Mon Mar 4, 2013, 04:39 PM
Mar 2013

find all this stuff out?

I know a lot of times people actually visit the archives in the areas they're looking for, which isn't possible for me.

I was using Ancestry.com but ran into lots of dead ends, or, worse...totally false information.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
26. I have been able to go way back on ancestry.
Mon Mar 4, 2013, 06:03 PM
Mar 2013

A couple of lines as far back as B.C.

Many other lines to the Middle Ages.

Oddly enough, the one I'm stuck on is my great grandfather in Ontario. Can't find his parents.

And yes, researching on ancestry has its downside, as there are a lot of errors and you have to confirm by other sources.

BTW, you know there is a genealogy group on DU?

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
9. yeah, just the names of some of my ancestors are clues
Mon Mar 4, 2013, 03:45 PM
Mar 2013

The Skull Cleaver, for one.

If you want to see some of them, take a look at Rollo the Giant -- my grandfather, about 40 generations removed.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
20. OMG
Mon Mar 4, 2013, 05:51 PM
Mar 2013

That's my ancestor!

My fam members ruled the Orkney Islands for generations.

Thanks for that image!

Brigid

(17,621 posts)
23. Some of my ancestors on my dad's side . . .
Mon Mar 4, 2013, 05:57 PM
Mar 2013

Came from the same clan as Macbeth. And I probably have pretty good dose of Viking blood, since both sides of my family came mostly from the British Isles. Isn't geneology cool?

OriginalGeek

(12,132 posts)
30. yes
Mon Mar 4, 2013, 06:56 PM
Mar 2013

I get it at Total Wine and Spirits in Orlando, FL - they have a great selection of imports and craft/micro brews. I know they have several other locations but I don't know if they go out of Florida...hopefully you live in a state that allows you to buy big beers - it's 8.5% abv and will split your skull but you will love it.

http://www.sinclairbreweries.co.uk/skull_splitter.html


Skull Splitter is our strongest ale: which is named after Thorfinn Einarsson who was the 7th Viking Earl of Orkney. Sophisticated, satiny smooth with a deceptively light character, it is a tribute to our colourful forbear.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
28. the name of the Skull Splitter is Thornfinn Einarsson
Mon Mar 4, 2013, 06:08 PM
Mar 2013

Born in Orkney about 890. Son of Sigurd the Stout Hlodvarsson, Jarl (Earl) of Orkney. Grandson of King Rogwald the Wise Eystenson, Jarl of More. Great great grandson of Ivar Halfdansson, King of Sweden.

struggle4progress

(118,431 posts)
17. A fun Viking show between 957 and 963 was "Leave It to Skull Cleaver"
Mon Mar 4, 2013, 04:28 PM
Mar 2013

about idyllic childhood in the suburbs of Danelaw

Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
36. Featuring Skull, brother of Walleyed, son of Juneth and Wardlock,
Mon Mar 4, 2013, 11:44 PM
Mar 2013

and Eddye Haskellsson of Thornbutt, the maker of trouble.

pipi_k

(21,020 posts)
27. Isn't it cool
Mon Mar 4, 2013, 06:05 PM
Mar 2013

how the family resemblance can carry on year after year...

Doing my own family I found a line that lived out in the midwest but is no relation whatsoever to any of my ancestors and I would have forgotten about it except that one guy's photo (from the mid 1800s) looked almost exactly like an uncle who was born in 1946.

They could have been brothers, that's how much alike they looked.

It's fascinating stuff!

Spike89

(1,569 posts)
5. Yeah, being half Norwegian I like to think so
Mon Mar 4, 2013, 03:00 PM
Mar 2013

However, I submit that anyone who could survive into adulthood in those days was tough. No real medicine, no "labor saving" devices to speak of, no electricy (heat and easy light)...I'm sure the "pampered" people were tougher than anyone in the US in the this century.

Xithras

(16,191 posts)
8. She was a shieldmaiden.
Mon Mar 4, 2013, 03:36 PM
Mar 2013

Viking society was interesting. Most major decisions, including the election of kings, were made via the Thing, which was a democratic body that any free adults could vote in. All men were REQUIRED to participate. Women were not required, but could do so if they wished, and many did.

The same concept applied to combat. All men were required to be trained in combat so they could defend themselves, and to participate in wars ordered by their kings or Thing. Women weren't required to fight, but could do so if they wanted. If they did, they trained alongside the men and fought just as hard.

There's an interesting story about Leif Eriksson's pregnant sister, who was a shieldmaiden in Vinland when the Vikings attempted to settle North America. According to the story, the native Americans were attacking the Viking village and were driving the men back when she walked out of her hut and saw what was happening. Infuriated, she grabbed a sword off of a dead Viking, ripped off her gown, and charged into the fight screaming at the cowardice of the men who were retreating. The Native Americans were so stunned by the sight of a furious, pregnant, mostly naked warrior woman hacking down their men in full combat that most of them fled in fright.

struggle4progress

(118,431 posts)
11. yeah, they were, like, a floating hell's angels troupe:
Mon Mar 4, 2013, 03:54 PM
Mar 2013

just imagine the dragonships lined up at a noisy seaside mead joint, loud music pouring out onto the wharf, and everybody being extra careful not to touch anybody else's boats

kwassa

(23,340 posts)
32. They founded Russia.
Mon Mar 4, 2013, 08:24 PM
Mar 2013

which is named after the Rus', a Viking group from what is now Sweden.

also, the city of Dublin started out as a Viking settlement.

They got around.

cemaphonic

(4,138 posts)
34. Normans also unified just about all of medieval Italy south of the Papal States
Mon Mar 4, 2013, 08:36 PM
Mar 2013

Of course, their North American settlements eventually failed. Those Skraelings must have been some tough bastards.

Xithras

(16,191 posts)
35. It was more a matter of numbers.
Mon Mar 4, 2013, 09:36 PM
Mar 2013

"Skraeling" referred to all of the native people they met, from the Thule southward, but the people who drove them back were a Native American tribe on Newfoundland. The sagas don't make it sound like they were particularly fierce warriors, but the Viking settlers could only come a few dozen to a boat. Digs at the village site in Newfoundland confirm what the sagas suggest, which is that there simply weren't enough Vikings to hold the land. At most, there were 100 or so Vikings in Vinland. While they were better armed and were able to hold the Natives off in every attack, a hundred people simply couldn't make a permanent stand against a native population that may have been twenty times their size.

The Vikings invaded much of Northern Europe because they poured in by the thousands. They took Iceland with much smaller numbers because that island was unpopulated. The Vikings who reached Vinland were just as fierce as the rest, but there weren't many of them, and those lands were already heavily populated with natives who weren't going to give up without a fight.

cemaphonic

(4,138 posts)
38. Yeah, normally I'm a stickler over history vs. mythologizing too, but...
Tue Mar 5, 2013, 02:10 AM
Mar 2013

1) Lounge thread

2) The Inuit are given short shrift by history. If you're going to be known for one thing, "Gave the Vikings a black eye" isn't a bad one, even if it's a huge simplification.

Xithras

(16,191 posts)
40. It wasn't the Inuit.
Tue Mar 5, 2013, 03:34 AM
Mar 2013

I had to look it up, but the people on Newfoundland at that time were the ancestors of the Beothuk, who were believed to be related to the Algonquins.

Technically the Inuit didn't exist on Canada's east coast when the Vikings landed. The people we now know as the Inuit still only existed west of the Hudson Bay. The tribes on the east coast were the Dorset (now extinct, wiped out by the Inuit), the Innu (which, despite the name, aren't related to the Inuit...and they still exist), and the Beothuk (now extinct, wiped out by later European settlers...they beat the Vikings, but they couldn't fight cholera).



Oh yeah, Lounge thread. Sorry

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»Wow, the Vikings were som...