Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumBill Maher Battles Frank Luntz Over Obama, Romney, And ‘Low-Information Voters’
VIDEO here: http://www.mediaite.com/tv/bill-maher-battles-frank-luntz-over-obama-romney-and-low-information-voters/
Bill Maher interviewed Republican pollster Frank Luntz on his show tonight to get his take on how President Obama and Mitt Romney did during this weeks debate. Luntz predicted that despite the presidents poor performance, Obama would still win reelection. However, Maher immediately switched topics to tell Luntz its widely known that youre evil. -snip-
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 2037 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bill Maher Battles Frank Luntz Over Obama, Romney, And ‘Low-Information Voters’ (Original Post)
Tx4obama
Oct 2012
OP
agree a bit with luntz - obama should say working people instead of middle class nt
msongs
Oct 2012
#1
While quite funny, it was also quite serious. Luntz hit a point on people wanting Congress to WORK!
HopeHoops
Oct 2012
#3
msongs
(67,401 posts)1. agree a bit with luntz - obama should say working people instead of middle class nt
oswaldactedalone
(3,491 posts)2. Bottom line is
Plouffe, Axelrod, and Obama must have a better gameplan for the second debate. They weren't prepared, didn't do their homework, thought they could coast. When used properly, "zingers" aka strong comebacks are perfectly fine. Rmoney's team totally outfoxed them.
Step up to the plate boys or we're going to very disappointed on 11-6.
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)3. While quite funny, it was also quite serious. Luntz hit a point on people wanting Congress to WORK!
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)5. yet also ignored repugs standing up day one saying, nothing gets passed a blaming obama. nt
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)6. That was The Turtle.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)7. ya... him. lol. nt
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)4. maher did a disappointing job, especially at the end. nt