Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumTweety: if we had cable news, the Iraq war might not have happened
http://www.fair.org/blog/2012/05/24/chris-matthews-and-the-awesome-power-of-cable-television/
Hardball host Chris Matthews argued that because of the rise of opinion-based news networks, the non-critical aspect of the media is gone, going as far to say that the reporting that verified the U.S. administration's claims about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq in 2002 would not happen today because of cable news.
Umm He's aware of the fact that cable news channels existed in 2002, right?
In fact, here's some of what he and his cable colleagues were doing:
MSNBC's Hardball host Chris Matthews asks of World Bank/IMF protests in Washington, D.C.: "Those people out in the streets, do they hate America?" Conservative pundit Cliff May responds: "Yes, I'm afraid a lot of them do. They hate America. They align themselves with Saddam Hussein. They align themselves with terrorists all over the world." Hardball correspondent David Shuster later adds that "anti-Americanism is in the air."
more...
(...)
Skittles
(153,160 posts)Confusious
(8,317 posts)MSNBC is cable.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)'Matthews monologue is unsurprising, however, given his long record of hero worship for Bush and his supposedly powerful presidency:
Were proud of our president. Americans love having a guy as president, a guy who has a little swagger, whos physical. (5/1/03)
Sometimes it glimmers with this man, our president, that kind of sunny nobility. (10/25/05)
I like him. Everybody sort of likes the president, except for the real whack-jobs, maybe on the left. (11/28/05)
A little bit of Lincoln there, I think, referring to Bush finally admitting that telling Iraqi insurgents to bring it on in 2003 sent the wrong signal to people. (5/25/06)'
http://thinkprogress.org/media/2007/08/09/15370/matthews-bush-monologue/?mobile=nc
Tweety is the textbook illustration of the word "sycophant"
pam4water
(2,916 posts)butterfly77
(17,609 posts)at the time we talked about him and the rest of the media and how they were going along with the bullshit,some wrote him all of these liars in the media are trying to rewrite history.
immoderate
(20,885 posts)--imm
elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)He pushed for that frikkin war. He had a crush on Prezzydent Butch.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)The lies propagated by corporate media are for us. Matthews isn't required to believe a word he says.
immoderate
(20,885 posts)I think it's his internal "corn ball" that keeps him on the reservation.
(Hope I don't get juried out for using the bigoted term, "corn ball." )
--imm
underpants
(182,799 posts)and you personally Chris had Ben Ginsberg on your own show for the last THREE MONTHS leading up to the 2004 election. You personally have blood on your hands.
Enrique
(27,461 posts)that is not a Tweety quote, but Tweety did play a part in firing Donahue:
http://www.fair.org/blog/2010/10/08/chris-matthews-role-in-msnbcs-donahue-firing/
Gabriel Sherman's piece in New York magazine (10/3/10) on the cable news wars includes a bit of history on MSNBC's firing of progressive host Phil Donahue in 2003; an internal memo at the time worried that the showwould be "a home for the liberal anti-war agenda at the same time that our competitors are waving the flag at every opportunity." Sherman focuses on MSNBC personality Chris Matthewswho sometimes claimshe was opposed to the Iraq Warand his desire to get Donahue fired:
Donahue's problems only increased when Chris Matthews let it be known that he wanted Donahue off the air. Matthews was a rising force at the network, with a reported salary of $5 million. He cultivated former GE CEO Jack Welch and had the ear of NBC CEO Bob Wright. (The two summered together on Nantucket.) Matthews saw himself as MSNBC's biggest star, and he was upset that the network was pumping significant resources into Donahue's show. In the fall of 2002, U.S. News & World Report ran a gossip item that had Matthews saying over lunch in Washington that if Donahue stays on the air, he could bring down the network.
After the item was published, Matthews showed up at Donahue's office and apologized. "He didnt deny it," Donahue remembers. With the war looming, Sorenson and Griffin decided to take him off the air to make way for 24/7 war coverage.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Wonder who is threatening to pull his plug now, that he's been caught going half-way progressive?
And cable news faciliated the Iraq war and played cheerleader for the whole thing..
Thanks for that reference, Enrique.
otohara
(24,135 posts)did his best to expose the lies and was fired
Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)Plus, he happens to work for a network that is notorious for its opinion shows. It sounds to me as if Tweety is telling people animal cruelty is wrong, while he still kills ants.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)aint_no_life_nowhere
(21,925 posts)He attacked the motives of the Neocons and questioned the wisdom of going to war at all in this March 2002 article in the San Francisco Chronicle titled The Road To Baghdad, one of several anti-war articles he wrote in that paper.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2002/03/24/IN164155.DTL
Matthews was never a supporter of the Iraq War but he didn't have the guts to go on TV to express his true opposition once our troops were in there. As I recall, Keith Olbermann was the only guy with courage on commercial television to do that.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)"Calling Bush powerful on three separate occasions, Matthews marveled at the presidents defense of his foreign policy:
'We were given a rare opportunity to hear the real philosophy of this administration with regard to the war in Iraq. A powerful rendition by the president of why were there. When he talked about the fact that we can support emerging democracies in the Middle East, and thats the only way we can prevent future 9/11?s, youre getting to the heart of why this administration is fighting that war in Iraq.[\b]
'This president is ready to fight like a rock through the rest of his term, Matthews proclaimed. He made it clear that hes going to fight as long as it takes to develop a democracy in Iraq. Theres not going to be any change come September.
http://thinkprogress.org/media/2007/08/09/15370/matthews-bush-monologue/?mobile=nc
ForgoTheConsequence
(4,868 posts)Cable news was part of the machine that manufactured consent for the war in Iraq. After 9/11 there were American flags and jingoism on every cable news channel including MSNBC which was conservative and a rival of Fox News at the time. They only went to the left because they failed at being another Fox News. Fuck the corporate news media including Fox and MSNBC. Think for yourself and don't let Comcast, Time Warner, and Rupert Murdoch do your thinking for you.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)MSNBC had paid "analysts" from military ranks. MSNBC had "cheerleaders" among its female talent who handled a daily segment where faces of KIA soldiers were honored. MSNBC had embedded reporters such as the one who was killed by a blood clot after riding along in cramped vehicles with the troops.
CNN was even worse. I remember a live late-night wild ride with an embedded reporter and a crew -- out in the desert.
Oh, and who can forget the faked footage of the fall of Saddam's statue in Baghdad?
Geez.
Tweety must have had a blood sugar swing.
sandyshoes17
(657 posts)In the 2004 election he had the swift boaters on every night for a whole week, that did it for me. I like what he's doing lately, but don't trust him at all. Who knows what his real values are?
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)Never trust Matthews to be first in line to do the right thing; look for him following behind, kissing the butts of whoever's in front.
NRaleighLiberal
(60,014 posts)Mosaic
(1,451 posts)I watch him often for entertainment, not news. You're completely correct and it's not mean to state plain facts.
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)Larry Mondello.
90-percent
(6,829 posts)"WE ARE ALL NEOCONS NOW"
I don't think the landscsape of news coverage on cable has changed that much since 2002.
I also think that more and more people that don't want to be ill informed or LOW INFORMATION VOTERS are turning to the internet for their news, because they know that all of American Main Stream Media that comes through the TV machine is fascist corporate propaganda. It's bullshit manufactured by the sociopaths that have captured all our institutions.
The most galling recent item in modern MSM is the selling of per-emptive war against Iran so as to keep them from getting the bomb.
Americans will enjoy TEN TIMES the casualty rate of Iraq and Afghanistan and the reinstatement of the draft if that future fiasco gets sold. We'll get to repeat the failure lessons of Viet Nam for the second fucking time in my lifetime! 58,000 on the Wall. We can beat that this time!
-90% jimmy
Adenoid_Hynkel
(14,093 posts)Seeing as he was fired from MSNBC for being antiwar (and Tweety had a hand in it)
harmonicon
(12,008 posts)but never things like... I don't know... my entire career/adult life.
PA Democrat
(13,225 posts)BECAUSE of his views on Iraq, despite having the highest rated show on MSNBC.
Although Donahue didn't know it at the time, his fate was sealed a number of weeks ago after NBC News executives received the results of a study commissioned to provide guidance on the future of the news channel.
That report--shared with me by an NBC news insider--gives an excruciatingly painful assessment of the channel and its programming. Some of recommendations, such as dropping the "America's News Channel," have already been implemented. But the harshest criticism was leveled at Donahue, whom the authors of the study described as "a tired, left-wing liberal out of touch with the current marketplace."
The study went on to claim that Donahue presented a "difficult public face for NBC in a time of war......He seems to delight in presenting guests who are anti-war, anti-Bush and skeptical of the administration's motives." The report went on to outline a possible nightmare scenario where the show becomes "a home for the liberal antiwar agenda at the same time that our competitors are waving the flag at every opportunity."
http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0226-11.htm
davidwparker
(5,397 posts)the Iraq war.
marmar
(77,080 posts)KurtNYC
(14,549 posts)It's very conveeeeenient.
pam4water
(2,916 posts)and the rest of them egg on the war.