Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

GoLeft TV

(3,910 posts)
Mon Nov 16, 2015, 04:01 PM Nov 2015

Hillary Defends Wall Street Ties With Tasteless 9/11 Reference

Hillary Clinton was asked during the second democratic debate about her Wall Street ties, and her response isn’t sitting well with Democratic voters. Using an old staple of the Republican Party, Hillary defended her ties to the criminals on Wall Street by invoking 9/11.

Ring of Fire’s Farron Cousins discusses this.

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Defends Wall Street Ties With Tasteless 9/11 Reference (Original Post) GoLeft TV Nov 2015 OP
No she didn't. The tweet is whats tastless. misterhighwasted Nov 2015 #1
I love Hillary but don't ignore the facts. bjobotts Nov 2015 #4
I doubt you really "love" Hillary. misterhighwasted Nov 2015 #6
The tweet seem tasteless in Republican circles.... raindaddy Nov 2015 #9
Andy Grewal. GOTV dredges up the Federalist Society?? misterhighwasted Nov 2015 #2
One and the same... Skidmore Nov 2015 #5
Yup. and that's the final gasps of a dying campaign. misterhighwasted Nov 2015 #7
Wow mcar Nov 2015 #8
yes, see my riversedge Nov 2015 #11
OMG..This is slander, really Ring of Fire?? Ya dug down to the Federalist Society Level for the dirt misterhighwasted Nov 2015 #12
Ouch! MissDeeds Nov 2015 #3
Whether Clinton supporters like it or not, Unknown Beatle Nov 2015 #10
Madam President has it and now amount of smearing form Sander fans will riversedge Nov 2015 #13
Why do you continue to conflate truth with smears? Unknown Beatle Nov 2015 #14
That's the debate that she "won",...right? Spitfire of ATJ Nov 2015 #15

misterhighwasted

(9,148 posts)
1. No she didn't. The tweet is whats tastless.
Mon Nov 16, 2015, 04:16 PM
Nov 2015

But run with whatever you can twist into a smear. Its been debunked.
Have a nice afternoon!

misterhighwasted

(9,148 posts)
6. I doubt you really "love" Hillary.
Mon Nov 16, 2015, 04:57 PM
Nov 2015

The facts are more like this statement (in part) from your guy bernie:
"Later in the debate Bernie Sanders agreed: “I applaud Secretary Clinton. She did. She's the senator from New York. She worked – and many of us supported you – in trying to rebuild that devastation.” 

The Beltway pundit class did not approve of Hillary’s answer, exposing the always lurking media antipathy toward her, the constant search for a scandal. Politico chief political correspondent Glenn Thrush (a veteran reporter we know and like) went so far as to label the former U.S. Senator and Secretary of State’s words “cray cray.” We do not believe Glenn would use the same language against, for argument’s sake, President Obama. 

Furthermore, as Bernie Sanders explicitly agreed, her remarks were accurate. Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta noted after the debate: "When people attack her and call her quote-unquote the 'Senator from Wall Street,' they ought to remember that she was instrumental in trying to rebuild an important part of the New York economy." 

Indeed they should – because in some ways helping to rebuild lower Manhattan and defending a crippled New York City economy against cuts in post-9/11 aid demanded by right wing Republicans was a defining moment in the newly-elected senator’s career. And Hillary did it without grandstanding; she simply dug in and fought for New York.... "

raindaddy

(1,370 posts)
9. The tweet seem tasteless in Republican circles....
Mon Nov 16, 2015, 06:37 PM
Nov 2015

"Why candidates who receive large sums of money from Wall Street should be trusted to regulate it".. Should be asked by every Democrat who is thinking about voting for Hillary Clinton.. In fact the question that really needs to be asked is.. When did protecting Wall Street banks that have become so big they can collapse our economy become a policy of a potential Democratic President??

And what was really tasteless was evoking the attack on 9/11 as a way to avoid directly answering the question...

misterhighwasted

(9,148 posts)
2. Andy Grewal. GOTV dredges up the Federalist Society??
Mon Nov 16, 2015, 04:35 PM
Nov 2015

Good lord, the desperation.
http://www.fed-soc.org/experts/detail/andy-grewal

The tweet that started this came from Mr Andy Grewal.
Ring of Fire's' credibility sinks to new a low as they out their sources.


misterhighwasted

(9,148 posts)
7. Yup. and that's the final gasps of a dying campaign.
Mon Nov 16, 2015, 05:01 PM
Nov 2015

Federalists, Libertarians, ..its a mixed brew.
They appear every election cycle, still regurgitating from the last one.
Figures it came from the fringe.

misterhighwasted

(9,148 posts)
12. OMG..This is slander, really Ring of Fire?? Ya dug down to the Federalist Society Level for the dirt
Mon Nov 16, 2015, 07:48 PM
Nov 2015

What a bunch of sick ****s

Unknown Beatle

(2,672 posts)
10. Whether Clinton supporters like it or not,
Mon Nov 16, 2015, 07:22 PM
Nov 2015

Hillary coddling up to Wall St. is on the record. And no amount of spin is going to change that fact.

What is it with facts and truth that bothers her supporters so much. Going so far as to claim facts and truth are smears and lies.

The simple fact is that Hillary invoked 9/11 in protection of her Wall St. ties.

riversedge

(70,218 posts)
13. Madam President has it and now amount of smearing form Sander fans will
Mon Nov 16, 2015, 08:00 PM
Nov 2015

get her down--and you know it.


Silvina Alarcon @salarcon1

Together we will SHATTER the glass ceiling with @HillaryClinton ! @HillaryforSC #ImWithHer
8:12 PM - 14 Nov 2015 · Myrtle Beach, SC, United States

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Hillary Defends Wall Stre...