Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumThom Hartmann: Time To Start Treating Guns Like Abortions
The Supreme Court ruled that Americans have an individual right to bear arms - but they've also ruled that women have an individual right to access to safe abortions. So why don't we start regulating these two individual rights in the same way?
For more information on the stories we've covered visit our websites at thomhartmann.com - freespeech.org - and RT.com. You can also watch tonight's show on Hulu - at Hulu.com/THE BIG PICTURE and over at The Big Picture YouTube page. And - be sure to check us out on Facebook and Twitter!
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 1340 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Thom Hartmann: Time To Start Treating Guns Like Abortions (Original Post)
thomhartmann
Aug 2015
OP
It would be great to have a transcript of this, so Thom's free speech could be amplified on gun control.
Fred Sanders
Aug 2015
#1
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)1. It would be great to have a transcript of this, so Thom's free speech could be amplified on gun control.
We justify the use graphic warning labels on cigarette packages because of the proven risk of death by possessing and using these inanimate objects as they were designed to be be used....but why not on guns - at least in some graphic way - a warning of the proven risk of possessing and using the inanimate GUN?
-none
(1,884 posts)2. Can you imagine the screaming and gnashing of teeth if they were required by law to have a warning
label on all their guns, warning of the deadly consequences their guns can and do cause?
That would be wonderful start to real gun control.
Elmergantry
(884 posts)3. Didnt watch but..
So like abortions, if you dont like guns, dont get one?
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)6. Maybe you should have watched
because the point of his message went right over your head. Woosh!
Doc_Technical
(3,526 posts)4. Outlaw the civilian ownership of semi-automatic handguns,
and the Webley-Fosbery.
zebonaut
(3,688 posts)5. Will Republicans argue every Fetus needs to be Armed???
Elmergantry
(884 posts)7. Or is the burning issue
is all fetuses packing heat automatically subject to "concealed carry" law?