Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forum"Colleges Train for Work, Not Thought"....What Does Anyone Think of This?..
Colleges Train for Work, Not Thought
Uploaded on Aug 17, 2015
Professor Larry Wilkerson discusses the latest in the high cost of college and the increasing role universities play in prepping a work force rather than an intellect force
Bio
Lawrence Wilkerson is a retired United States Army soldier and former chief of staff to United States Secretary of State Colin Powell. Wilkerson is an adjunct professor at the College of William & Mary where he teaches courses on US national security. He also instructs a senior seminar in the Honors Department at the George Washington University entitled "National Security Decision Making."
Interviewer:
Jared A. Ball is a father and husband. After that he is a multimedia host, producer, journalist and educator. Ball is also a founder of "mixtape radio" and "mixtape journalism" about which he wrote I MiX What I Like: A MiXtape Manifesto (AK Press, 2011) and is co-editor of A Lie of Reinvention: Correcting Manning Marable's Malcolm X (Black Classic Press, 2012). Ball is an associate professor of communication studies at Morgan State University in Baltimore, Maryland and can be found online at IMIXWHATILIKE.ORG.
Full Transcript at This Link if you'd rather Read than Watch:
http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=14491
WATCH:
zeemike
(18,998 posts)Like George Carlin said, they want obedient workers.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)I think it is symbiotic: Companies used to hire people and then train them; now they want want schools to do it. And if schools focus on that, they aren't focusing on teaching people to think. It's all about people serving the economy, itself of vice versa. And to quote the late great Molly Ivins, elites don't want our kids educated, they wanted them "trained."
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)In the pathological pursuit of profits, corporations are constantly looking for new ways to shirk responsibilities and avoid costs by pushing them out to society as a whole.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)The article is called, "How College Sold Its Soul ... And Surrendered to the Market."
This gives you an overview of the article:
http://harpers.org/blog/2015/08/introducing-the-september-issue/
KoKo
(84,711 posts)RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)As you may know, I'm a big fan of TRNN. And also of Harper's!
Two rare breaths of fresh air amidst the general media miasma.
can't be controlled by the power elite.
xocet
(3,871 posts)The Educational Legacy of Ronald Reagan
by Gary K. Clabaugh
...
What is that legacy? Lets begin with a look at his record as governor of California. While running for the governorship, Mr. Reagan shrewdly made the most of disorder on University of California campuses. For instance, he demanded a legislative investigation of alleged Communism and sexual misconduct at the University of California at Berkeley. He insisted on public hearings, claiming a small minority of hippies, radicals and filthy speech advocates had caused disorder and that they should be taken by the scruff of the neck and thrown off campuspermanently.(1)
Once elected, Mr. Reagan set the educational tone for his administration by
calling for an end to free tuition for state college and university students
annually demanding 20 percent across-the-board cuts in higher education funding(2)
repeatedly slashing construction funds for state campuses
engineering the firing of Clark Kerr, the highly respected president of the University of California
declaring that the state should not subsidize intellectual curiosity(3)
And Mr. Reagan certainly did not let up on the criticisms of campus protesters that had aided his election. His denunciations of student protesters were both frequent and particularly venomous. He called protesting students brats, freaks, and cowardly fascists. And when it came to restoring order on unruly campuses he observed, If it takes a bloodbath, lets get it over with. No more appeasement!
Several days later four Kent State students were shot to death during a protest rally. In the aftermath of this tragedy Mr. Reagan declared his remark was only a figure of speech. He added that anyone who was upset by it was neurotic.(4) One wonders if his reaction reveals him as a demagogue or merely unfeeling.
...
http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ684842.pdf
eppur_se_muova
(36,262 posts)DUgle "Powell Memo" or "Powell Manifesto" ... e.g. http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025400732 ... Reagan, a True Believer, was the first politician to really put the power of the US govt at the service of big business in pursuit of the goals expressed in the Powell Memorandum.
For the Powell Memo itself, see http://reclaimdemocracy.org/powell_memo_lewis/ . A useful discussion in terms of education is at http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023038295
xocet
(3,871 posts)xocet
(3,871 posts)Beyond the article's abstract is not accessible without registering/subscribing:
Kerr Weighs New Post
By WALLACE TURNER Special to The New York Times;
January 07, 1967
BERKELEY, Calif., Jan. 6 Gov. Ronald Reagan wants to cut the state appropriation proposed for the University of California next year. He also wants to end a century-old tradition of free education by requiring tuition payments that would help finance the school.
...
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9401E4D7133CE43BBC4F53DFB766838C679EDE
Here is another interesting article - unfortunately, I am a bit short on primary sources...
Aaron Bady and Mike Konczal | Fall 2012
The California student movement has a slogan that goes, Behind every fee hike, a line of riot cops. And no one embodies that connection more than the Ronald Reagan of the 1960s. Elected governor of California in 1966 after running a scorched-earth campaign against the University of California, Reagan vowed to clean up that mess in Berkeley, warned audiences of sexual orgies so vile that I cannot describe them to you, complained that outside agitators were bringing left-wing subversion into the university, and railed against spoiled children of privilege skipping their classes to go to protests. He also ran on an anti-tax platform and promised to put the states finances in order by throw[ing] the bums off welfare. But it was the University of California at Berkeley that provided the most useful political foil, crystallizing all of his ideological themes into a single figure for disorder, a subversive menace of sexual, social, generational, and even communist deviance.
When Reagan assumed office, he immediately set about doing exactly what he had promised. He cut state funding for higher education, laid the foundations for a shift to a tuition-based funding model, and called in the National Guard to crush student protest, which it did with unprecedented severity. But he was only able to do this because he had already successfully shifted the political debate over the meaning and purpose of public higher education in America. The first bums he threw off welfare were California university students. Instead of seeing the education of the states youth as a patriotic duty and a vital weapon in the Cold War, he cast universities as a problem in and of themselvesboth an expensive welfare program and dangerously close to socialism. He even argued for the importance of tuition-based funding by suggesting that if students had to pay, theyd value their education too much to protest.
Its important to remember this chapter in California history because it may, in retrospect, have signaled the beginning of the end of public higher education in the United States as wed known it. Its true that when the Great Recession began in 2008, state budgets crumbled under a crippling new fiscal reality and tuition and debt levels began to skyrocket. It was also in the context of the California student movement that the slogan Occupy Everything, Demand Nothing first emerged, in 2009, when students occupied campus buildings in protest against budget cuts, tuition hikes, and staff cutbacks, and were crushed by the same kind of overwhelming police force that was later mobilized against Occupy encampments across the country. But while university administrators have blamed budgetary problems on state legislaturesand scapegoated individual police officers, like the now-notorious (and former) UC-Davis pepper spray cop, for overreactionsthese scenarios are déjà vu all over again for those with long memories. When Mitt Romney urges Americans to get as much education as they can afford, or when university administrators call the police as their first response to student protest, its Ronald Reagans playbook theyre working from.
Books such as Christopher Newfields Unmaking the Public University connect the dots between the post-64 cultural politics of neoconservative backlash and the rise of Reagan as its standard bearer, but advocates of public education have been playing defense for so long that the vision animating the first century of American public education can be difficult to recall, much less recover or put forward persuasively. Thanks to the Reagan revolution, in short, weve forgotten that the United States was building public schools and universities for a lot longer than it has been letting them crumble. If we want to tell a different story than the decline of public educationand especially if we want to see it rise againit behooves us to move past Reagan and the backlash, and to think more clearly about what they destroyed, and what weve lost.
...
http://www.dissentmagazine.org/article/from-master-plan-to-no-plan-the-slow-death-of-public-higher-education
eppur_se_muova
(36,262 posts)Will have to read that whole article; the last para of the excerpt is particularly poignant.
niyad
(113,302 posts)GreatGazoo
(3,937 posts)College is an archaic system, not efficient, not cost effective and not responsive to the customer. Kids are pushed into college like lemmings.
There is nothing magical about sitting in a lecture hall 3x a week and taking two tests in 10 weeks. Nothing happens in that process, which was developed before electric lighting, that couldn't happen in more modern settings.
If you pay money to sit in a lecture hall and listen to a guy making $85K while the college pays the football coach $3mil+ what do you expect ?
eppur_se_muova
(36,262 posts)Try half that, ***IF*** you're lucky enough to get a temporary full-time position. More likely, it will be temporary (term-to-term), part-time, paying a few thousand per course. Colleges simply are not hiring tenure-track people when they can hire NTT instead, and not hiring full-time as long as there are part-timers available -- and there are thousands of unemployed/underemployed instructors for every college subject out there.
UA sure as Hell isn't paying that much, nor is that other football school, Auburn. I've worked for UAH and UNA and both were possible only because I didn't have to pay rent.
Don't be misled by AAUP salary surveys -- they only cover full-time positions, and those are rapidly becoming a small minority.