Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

GoLeft TV

(3,910 posts)
Wed May 27, 2015, 03:20 PM May 2015

Hillary and Wall Street: A Love Story



Hillary Clinton currently holds the lead in the Democratic race for the nomination – not surprising considering she only has one announced challenger and the name recognition, financial ties, and Washington allies to back her.

While the GOP wants to focus on Clinton’s involvement – or as they say, lack of involvement – over Benghazi, the real thing we should be focusing on with Hillary is her time in the White House in the 1990’s.

Full text at Ring of Fire.
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary and Wall Street: A Love Story (Original Post) GoLeft TV May 2015 OP
K&R. All true. JDPriestly May 2015 #1
^^^^THAT^^^^ onecaliberal May 2015 #2
^^^that!^^^ peacebird May 2015 #4
. stonecutter357 May 2015 #3
. peacebird May 2015 #5
Ladies and gentimen I present to you ...Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein ...and Hillary. L0oniX May 2015 #9
Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein? stonecutter357 May 2015 #12
non productive posts like yours continue to further sour my opinion of your candidate corkhead May 2015 #13
K&R..... daleanime May 2015 #6
My god, how the money rolled in! Divernan May 2015 #7
Where does Clintons' symbiotic relationship w/ Wall Street leave the rest of us? Divernan May 2015 #8
We have our work cut out for us. We must find a way to bypass the Corp-Media to get rhett o rick May 2015 #10
K&R n/t MissDeeds May 2015 #11
K&R cprise May 2015 #14
Lloyd Blankfein: "I held fundraisers for her." (HRC) antigop May 2015 #15
even more than Obama. This is really bad. Doctor_J May 2015 #16
The Clinton's have ammased a personal fortune by tapping into Wall St. Now NorthCarolina May 2015 #17

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
1. K&R. All true.
Wed May 27, 2015, 03:37 PM
May 2015

Bernie isn't super rich, but he isn't in the pay of the banks either. Go, Bernie.

This is not negative campaigning. It is the truth. Every word of it.

Hillary has made her bed by cozying up to and taking money from bankers, now . . . . .

If you think I am being snarky, I am not. It is important that voters recognize on whose side Hillary will really be on if elected.

Nothing against bankers who do no wrong and care for investors' and depositors' and government money responsibly. But . . . . huge speaking fees from bankers? How can you seriously claim to oppose Citizens United after taking so many of them?

corkhead

(6,119 posts)
13. non productive posts like yours continue to further sour my opinion of your candidate
Wed May 27, 2015, 05:39 PM
May 2015

I see your and raise you a

Divernan

(15,480 posts)
7. My god, how the money rolled in!
Wed May 27, 2015, 04:16 PM
May 2015
When Bill Clinton was president, he had his allies in Congress pass the Financial Services Modernization Act, which repealed the Glass Steagall law that separated commercial and investment banking. This resulted in a spree of mergers and growth that involved a huge growth in the size of the nation’s biggest banks and their profits.

It wasn’t long after this that longtime Clinton friend and leader of the Treasury Robert Rubin left the administration to go work for Citigroup, where he began earning around $10 million dollars a year. Once he left office, Bill Clinton was no stranger to giving speeches at events hosted and paid for by the big banks, with speaking fees starting around $125,000 an hour.

At the same time that Clinton was raking in cash on the bank-sponsored speaking circuit, Hillary was serving as a US Senator, where she actually voted in favor of George Bush’s bankruptcy bill that made it more difficult for struggling citizens to have their debts wiped out through bankruptcy. In other words, the legislation that Clinton favored – in spite of being warned about the impacts of the legislation by then-consumer advocate and law professor Elizabeth Warren – meant that people filing for bankruptcy would have their credit and basically their lives destroyed, but they still had to pay back the greedy bankers.

After she left the State Department, Hillary hit the speaking circuit like her husband, where she would get paid around $200,000 per speech by the big banks – her first two speeches were for Goldman Sachs. These banks also helped finance her Senate campaign, which is why she ignored Warren’s advice and voted in favor of the anti-consumer, pro-banker bankruptcy bill.

http://www.ringoffireradio.com/2015/05/hillary-and-wall-street-a-love-story/

Over the years Hillary Clinton was in the Senate, the financial industry paid millions of dollars to the couple's shared bank account. In 2004, Bill Clinton was paid a quarter million dollars to speak to Citigroup in Paris; the same year, Goldman Sachs paid him $125,000 for an address in New York City. The following year, Goldman paid him $125,000 for a speech in South Carolina, a quarter million to speak in Paris and $150,000 to speak in Greensboro, Georgia. This is just a small snippet of what the Clintons were paid.

As Secretary Clinton presided over our nation's foreign policy, her husband continued to rake in millions of dollars for the couple from domestic and foreign corporations. In particular, foreign firms in favor of the Trans-Pacific Partnership paid her husband $1.5 million.

After departing the State Department, Hillary decided to join the lecture circuit herself. Although we don't have any comprehensive financial disclosures for 2013, it is telling that two of her first addresses were for the Goldman Sachs megabank, where she reportedly earned $200,000 per address.

In 2014, the year Clinton was elevated to an all-but-certain presidential candidate, the power couple brought in enormous amounts of money from Wall Street. Bill Clinton gave an address to Bank of America in London that netted $500,000. Recall that this was a bank that netted $45 billion from taxpayers, thanks to a bailout package Hillary supported. That's an 8,999,990 percent return on investment.
http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/clintons-made-wall-street-richer-and-it-returned-favor

Divernan

(15,480 posts)
8. Where does Clintons' symbiotic relationship w/ Wall Street leave the rest of us?
Wed May 27, 2015, 04:25 PM
May 2015
The Clintons made the financial sector even richer, and in return, the financial sector made the Clintons go from being in debt when they lived in the White House to being in the top .01% of all American income earners. From deregulation of the big banks, to tightening personal bankruptcy laws, to supporting unfair and unfettered bailouts, the Clintons, to steal a phrase from Donna Summer, “worked hard for the money.”

Although Hillary has been cast in the media as running to the left by altering her previous positions on an array of social issues, her fundraising base is virtually the same as in 2008. In 2008, one of her first financiers was Alan Patricoff, a private equity kingpin who was critical of government regulations put in place after the Enron scandal. This year, Patricof is again a fundraiser for Hillary Clinton. While she talks about representing “everyday Americans,” it is estimated she raised a million dollars from just three fundraisers in New York City, one of them at the home of Steve Rattner, a financier who had to pay $10 million as part of a settlement related to kickbacks (he also campaigns to cut Social Security and Medicare).

In contrast, Bernie Sanders is said to have raised $4 million from a total of 100,000 donors. Sanders opposed the deregulation of Wall Street and the bailouts. He can't call a group of Wall Street friends and raise a million dollars in a weekend from enough people to fill three rooms.

The symbiotic relationship between the Clintons and high finance exists because America is a country where anybody can make it, if they just decide to help make the rich richer. The question is, where does this relationship leave the rest of us?


http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/clintons-made-wall-street-richer-and-it-returned-favor
 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
10. We have our work cut out for us. We must find a way to bypass the Corp-Media to get
Wed May 27, 2015, 04:34 PM
May 2015

the people's message out.

antigop

(12,778 posts)
15. Lloyd Blankfein: "I held fundraisers for her." (HRC)
Wed May 27, 2015, 08:59 PM
May 2015
http://www.politico.com/story/2014/04/wall-street-republicans-hillary-clinton-2016-106070.html

“If it turns out to be Jeb versus Hillary we would love that and either outcome would be fine,” one top Republican-leaning Wall Street lawyer said over lunch in midtown Manhattan last week. “We could live with either one. Jeb versus Joe Biden would also be fine. It’s Rand Paul or Ted Cruz versus someone like Elizabeth Warren that would be everybody’s worst nightmare.”

Most top GOP fundraisers and donors on Wall Street won’t say this kind of thing on the record for fear of heavy blowback from party officials, as well as supporters of Cruz and Rand Paul. Few want to acknowledge publicly that the Democratic front-runner fills them with less dread than some Republican 2016 hopefuls. And, to be sure, none of the Republican-leaning financial executives are so far suggesting they’d openly back her.

But the private consensus is similar to what Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein said to POLITICO late last year when he praised both Christie — before the bridge scandal — and Clinton. “I very much was supportive of Hillary Clinton the last go-round,” he said. “I held fundraisers for her.”
 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
16. even more than Obama. This is really bad.
Wed May 27, 2015, 11:05 PM
May 2015

She also pledged to be more appeasing to the republicans than Obama has been. I'm not sure how, exactly, but that's what she said

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Hillary and Wall Street: ...