Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Romney’s Charge That Most Federal Low-Income Spending Goes 4 “Overhead” & “Bureaucrats” Is more BULL
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Presidential candidate Mitt Romney has endorsed a proposal to eliminate major federal assistance programs for low-income Americans and turn them over to the states, often with deep funding cuts. But the rationale he offered for doing so in this past Sundays Meet the Press debate that the federal bureaucracy eats up most of the money Congress provides for these programs, and little actually reaches people in need is simply false. At least nine-tenths of federal spending for each of these programs (and in most cases, a higher percentage) reaches low-income Americans.
Romney said that all these federal programs that are bundled to help people and make sure we have a safety net need to be brought together and sent back to the states, and he specifically called for subjecting Medicaid, food stamps, and housing vouchers to this treatment. He has also embraced the budget of House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-WI), which the House passed in April, including provisions that would convert Medicaid and food stamps to block grants and cut their federal funding by $750 billion and $127 billion over ten years, respectively.
On Sunday, Romney said that most federal funding for these programs is absorbed by federal administrative costs, leaving very little for the low-income people whom the programs are supposed to help:
"What unfortunately happens is with all the multiplicity of federal programs, you have massive overhead, with government bureaucrats in Washington administering all these programs, very little of the money thats actually needed by those that really need help, those that cant care for themselves, actually reaches them."
This statement is false. Budget data for the major low-income assistance programs Medicaid, food stamps (now known as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP), the Supplemental Security Income program for the elderly and disabled poor, housing vouchers, the school lunch and breakfast programs, and the Earned Income Tax Credit show that, in every case, federal administrative costs range from less than 1 percent to 8 percent of total federal program spending. Combined federal and state administrative costs range from 1 percent to 10 percent of total federal- and state-funded program spending.
<MORE>
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 887 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Romney’s Charge That Most Federal Low-Income Spending Goes 4 “Overhead” & “Bureaucrats” Is more BULL (Original Post)
Bill USA
Jan 2012
OP
where the 1% fought tooth and nail to keep 15-20% off the top in for-profit insurance.
Warren Stupidity
Jan 2012
#2
qb
(5,924 posts)1. He's confused them with for-profit health care.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)2. where the 1% fought tooth and nail to keep 15-20% off the top in for-profit insurance.
And they wanted much more. They are screaming about having to spend 80-85% of every dollar taken in on actual medical care. The horrors!
marmar
(77,080 posts)3. No, that would be PRIVATE industry, Mittens......
There's far less overhead in government.