Thu Dec 20, 2012, 04:40 PM
Bucky (41,687 posts)
Io9: Did fist fighting change the course of human evolution?http://io9.com/5970186/did-fist-fighting-change-the-course-of-human-evolution
|
4 replies, 537 views
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
| Author | Time | Post | |
| Bucky | Dec 2012 | OP | |
| Common Sense Party | Dec 2012 | #1 | |
| GeorgeGist | Dec 2012 | #2 | |
| Bucky | Dec 2012 | #3 | |
| bemildred | Dec 2012 | #4 |
Response to Bucky (Original post)
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 04:43 PM
Common Sense Party (13,091 posts)
1. Except that hitting someone with your fist is often a very stupid thing to do.
|
Your hand is made up of a bunch of little, rather fragile bones.
The human skull is incredibly strong and solid. Fist vs. skull loses more often than not. |
Response to GeorgeGist (Reply #2)
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 05:54 PM
Bucky (41,687 posts)
3. The article was clearly *not* making that argument.
|
The simplified explanations in articles written for the general public can often leave that impression, I admit. But I think it's clear from the reading that the scientific article the Io9.com article was referencing was a peer-reviewed journal that would (presumedly) avoid a discredited theory from over half a century ago. To wit, the guys with the fists best suited to punchin' were more likely to pass along their genes--heh heh, if you know what I mean--than those with the long monkey fingers.
|
Response to Bucky (Original post)
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 07:31 PM
bemildred (67,764 posts)
4. I will hazard the opinion that the ability to hold a club was a good deal more important
|
than the ability to make a fist, so much more direct if you see what I mean, though one may also note that the two capabilities coincide.
|

