No, Virginia, Mitt Romney Did Not Pay 14.1% in Taxes in 2011 as He Claims, He Paid Less
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2012/09/no-virginia-mitt-romney-did-not-pay-14-1-in-taxes-in-2011-as-he-claims-he-paid-less.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+NakedCapitalism+%28naked+capitalism%29
I know this site may seem to be going hard and heavy after Romney in the last 24 hours, but truth be told, its just too much fun. And weve been shooting at Obama for so long that even this brief interlude of close scrutiny of Romney would not come close to achieving balance if balance as opposed to trying to get past the PR, were our objective.
Tax maven Lee Sheppard has a new piece up at Forbes on Romneys tax returns, which I suggest you read in full. It has juicy discussions of Romneys investments, and the sus-looiking grantor trusts (which appear to be making investments in funds that are taking the tax position that they are engaged in a trade or business, which seems really unusual, to put it politely). And Sheppard looks to have scored a personal win. She flagged Ann Rommeys horse Raflaca as not credible as a business, and lo and behold:
Expense for Raflaca didnt show up on the Romneys 2011 return. The campaign admitted that the expenses were regarded as personal.
But her discussion at the top really caught my eye. Mitt did not pay 13.7% in taxes in 2011. He paid a lower rate and made a voluntary contribution, which tax law does not consider an extra tax. Yet hes been characterizing this donation as a tax. This is a misrepresentation.
And if he chooses to, he can change his mind about that voluntary contribution. He has three years to amend his returns. What do you bet he wont take that gimmie back if he loses his Presidential bid?
Read more at
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2012/09/no-virginia-mitt-romney-did-not-pay-14-1-in-taxes-in-2011-as-he-claims-he-paid-less.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+NakedCapitalism+%28naked+capitalism%29#PH87jpd0rGIKuJBF.99