Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

midnight

(26,624 posts)
Mon Sep 17, 2012, 07:10 AM Sep 2012

Money for smaller classrooms & afterschool programs would get the ax, But not salaries of Congress.

Last edited Tue Sep 18, 2012, 08:45 AM - Edit history (1)

Because lawmakers couldn’t reach a deal to cut the nation’s $16 trillion debt, severe, across-the-board cuts will hit every corner of the federal government in early January.

But a little-known line in the Constitution means lawmakers’ salaries will be exempted from those looming cuts – even as their staffers take a hit to their pocketbooks.

The 27th Amendment prevents any increase or decrease to the salary of lawmakers until the start of the new Congress. And the so-called “sequester” is expected to come before the 113th Congress convenes.

Taxpayers are expected to pay about $103 million in salaries for House members and another $24 million in salaries for senators in fiscal year 2013.


I apologize if this was already posted.... Sometimes I find the hypocrisy so insulting that I can't help but post it even if it is a few days older...

http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-congress/2012/09/sequester-cuts-not-for-senate-and-house-salaries-135609.html

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Money for smaller classrooms & afterschool programs would get the ax, But not salaries of Congress. (Original Post) midnight Sep 2012 OP
Got a link? I'd like to share this. GreenPartyVoter Sep 2012 #1
I'm so sorry for not posting the link... I'm going to search and will try to get it to you... midnight Sep 2012 #3
Thank you! :^) GreenPartyVoter Sep 2012 #4
Well, no, of course not. Turbineguy Sep 2012 #2
Spam deleted by Kali (MIR Team) medvich Sep 2012 #5

Turbineguy

(37,331 posts)
2. Well, no, of course not.
Mon Sep 17, 2012, 07:19 AM
Sep 2012

How else would they get teabaggers to serve?

And they need to fix that one month waiting period for medical bennies too!

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Money for smaller classro...