Could the drone Iran has be fake???
According to an ex-Pentagon official, it could very well be.
http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/americas/united-states/111214/us-drone-iran-could-be-fake
tabatha
(18,795 posts)baldguy
(36,649 posts)The one that they're showing may be fake, though.
Poll_Blind
(23,864 posts)Not to mention some substantial analysis of the situation and the photos/video at The Aviationist:
http://theaviationist.com/category/captured-stealth-drone/
PB
tawadi
(2,110 posts)TheDebbieDee
(11,119 posts)customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)If it were fake, what good would revealing that be? For starters, the military would have to disclose facts about a real drone that perhaps they'd rather keep secret.
I'll admit, this post has made me think.
11cents
(1,777 posts)That seemed goofy and inexplicable to me. Please, Iran, give us back our drone. Of course they're not going to, so why make ourselves look weak? I don't have any working theory of what's really going on, but the fact that we "asked for it back" just didn't jibe with the notion that Iran had actually captured something so valuable.
FogerRox
(13,211 posts)The aviationist dosnt mention that, and instead clouds the issue with a video of a different vehicle spinning and crashing.
Its kind of silly to try and compare the gliding characteristics of a flying wing to a more conventionally designed aircraft. DAmned silly.
WheelWalker
(8,955 posts)Of course we asked for it back. It'd be a little strange if we didn't, don't you think? We're waiting for them to hook the electronics up to their computers; and no doubt it's wired - probably for a laser-guided thingamajig. Don't 'cha think?
On Edit: I know, a lot of America isn't what it use to be; but, I'll say one thing. America's military I trust to be competent. They continue to impress, IMO, as efficacious. And competent. They would not "lose" or "misplace" a drone without the intent to do so, IMO.
Merlot
(9,696 posts)Also, I thought that drones would have a "self destruct" mechanism that would be set off remotely if necessary.
Cronus Protagonist
(15,574 posts)Maybe that was also intended then... but why?
Control-Z
(15,682 posts)here, imo. I don't know what it is but I trust the US military to be better prepared in and for a situation like this. None of it make sense to me. Well, except republican's reactions. Lol. Bad Obama. Failure Obama.
Historic NY
(37,449 posts)Bucky
(54,003 posts)thescreaminghead
(37 posts)It's not a damn fake. Of course the Pentagon is gonna say this.