Pentagon Concludes America Not Safe Unless It Conquers the World
July 10, 2015
Pentagon Concludes America Not Safe Unless It Conquers the World
by Paul Craig Roberts
The Pentagon has released its National Military Strategy of the United States of America 2015, June 2015.
The document announces a shift in focus from terrorists to state actors that are challenging international norms. It is important to understand what these words mean. Governments that challenge international norms are sovereign countries that pursue policies independently of Washingtons policies. These revisionist states are threats, not because they plan to attack the US, which the Pentagon admits neither Russia nor China intend, but because they are independent.
Be sure to grasp the point: The threat is the existence of sovereign states, whose independence of action makes them revisionist states. In other words, their independence is out of step with the neoconservative Uni-Power doctrine that declares independent action to be the right of Washington alone. Washingtons History-given hegemony precludes any other country being independent in its actions. By definition, a country with a foreign policy independent of Washington is a threat.
The Pentagons report defines the foremost revisionist states as Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea. The focus is primarily on Russia. Washington hopes to co-op China, despite the tension to the Asia-Pacific region that Chinas defense of its sphere of influence causes, a defense inconsistent with international law (this from Washington, the great violator of international law), by turning over what remains of the American consumer market to China. It is not yet certain that Iran has escaped the fate that Washington imposed on Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Somalia, Yemen, Pakistan, Ukraine, and by complicity Palestine.
More:
http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/07/10/pentagon-concludes-america-not-safe-unless-it-conquers-the-world/
Fairgo
(1,571 posts)Look on my works, ye mighty and despair!
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Gloves are off.
I hope voters find out this information.
K&R
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Be sure to grasp the point: The threat is the existence of sovereign states, whose independence of action makes them revisionist states. In other words, their independence is out of step with the neoconservative Uni-power doctrine that declares independence to be the right of Washington alone. Washingtons History-given hegemony precludes any other country being independent in its actions.