Replanting America: 90 Percent of What We Eat Could Come From Local Farms
........................................................
Researchers J. Elliott Campbell and Andrew Zumkehr looked at every acre of active farmland in the U.S., regardless of what its used for, and imagined that instead of growing soybeans or corn for animal feed or syrup, it was used to grow vegetables. (Currently, only about 2 percent of American farmland is used to grow fruits or vegetables.) And not just any vegetables: They used the USDAs recommendations to imagine that all of those acres of land were designed to feed people within 100 miles a balanced diet, supplying enough from each food group. Converting the real yields (say, an acre of hay or corn) to imaginary yields (tomatoes, legumes, greens) is tricky, but using existing yield data from farms, along with a helpful model created by a team at Cornell University, gave them a pretty realistic figure.
Still, the study involves quite a few major leaps of faith because it seeks not to demonstrate what is possible for a given American right now but to lay out a basic overview of the ability of local food to feed all Americans. Its not just projecting yields for vegetables grown on land that is today dominated by corn and soy. The biggest leap of faith is perhaps an unexpected one and is surprisingly underreported: Why do we even want to adjust our food supply to be local in the first place?
Local food is kind of largely rejected by a lot of scientists from earth and environmental fields because the greenhouse gas emissions from the transportation of food from the farm to the retailer is actually really small compared to all the other emissions, said Campbell, an associate professor at UC Merced. (Zumkehr is one of his students; the two fused their research to attempt to answer this question.) We take it for granted that eating locally must provide a huge boost to our environmental bona fides, but if the only consideration is emissions from the trucks, trains, and planes that bring us food from elsewhere, were mistaken. Looking at our diet as a whole, the total amount of emissions that come from transportation is somewhere around 10 percenthardly the biggest factor. The bulk of emissions emerge from the farm itself, from the actual growing and production of the food.
More.................
http://www.takepart.com/article/2015/06/01/everyone-could-eat-local?cmpid=foodinc-fb
historylovr
(1,557 posts)Even if you take emissions out of the equation, the drought in California should be a huge clue that relying on just a few places to supply food is unsustainable.
swilton
(5,069 posts)in 1971 argued in Diet For A Small Planet that the world's hunger problem was not one of availability of food but of food distribution.....Today, more than three million copies of the book have been sold and Lappe and her daughter, Anna, have established the Small Planet Institute based in Cambridge, Mass., which is a collaborative network to bring democracy to life. With her daughter, she also co-founded the Small Planet Fund which channels resources to democratic and social movements worldwide.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frances_Moore_Lapp%C3%A9
Blanks
(4,835 posts)I'm always harping on this very thing.