Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LiberalElite

(14,691 posts)
Tue Mar 17, 2015, 07:24 PM Mar 2015

The Atlantic: The Irrationality Of Alcoholics Anonymous

http://www.theatlantic.com/features/archive/2015/03/the-irrationality-of-alcoholics-anonymous/386255/?google_editors_picks=true

"J.G. is a lawyer in his early 30s. He’s a fast talker and has the lean, sinewy build of a distance runner. His choice of profession seems preordained, as he speaks in fully formed paragraphs, his thoughts organized by topic sentences. He’s also a worrier—a big one—who for years used alcohol to soothe his anxiety.

J.G. started drinking at 15, when he and a friend experimented in his parents’ liquor cabinet. He favored gin and whiskey but drank whatever he thought his parents would miss the least. He discovered beer, too, and loved the earthy, bitter taste on his tongue when he took his first cold sip.

His drinking increased through college and into law school. He could, and occasionally did, pull back, going cold turkey for weeks at a time. But nothing quieted his anxious mind like booze, and when he didn’t drink, he didn’t sleep. After four or six weeks dry, he’d be back at the liquor store."
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Atlantic: The Irrationality Of Alcoholics Anonymous (Original Post) LiberalElite Mar 2015 OP
The religious nature of the program turns a lot of people off and that's sad Warpy Mar 2015 #1
And every person I've seen worshipping God... JayhawkSD Mar 2015 #8
It's most important to understand the disease of alcoholism, elleng Mar 2015 #2
Excellent article. Thanks. Fred Sanders Mar 2015 #3
AA is deficient Yonx Mar 2015 #4
Alcoholics Anonymous is a rightwing SCAM. blkmusclmachine Mar 2015 #5
Is your comment from 840high Mar 2015 #6
So do I disagree. elleng Mar 2015 #7
Thank you. Thanks to AA 840high Mar 2015 #9
Wonderful, 840! elleng Mar 2015 #11
AA came around when there was nothing else shrike Mar 2015 #10
Yes. Right. elleng Mar 2015 #12
Yes. 840high Mar 2015 #16
Just adding this here: woo me with science Mar 2015 #13
Dr. Milam has answers about ALCOHOLISM. elleng Mar 2015 #15
Chris Hayes doing a segment now, Tuesday, May17, on the article and subject. elleng Mar 2015 #14

Warpy

(111,254 posts)
1. The religious nature of the program turns a lot of people off and that's sad
Tue Mar 17, 2015, 07:35 PM
Mar 2015

because every person I know who has managed to get sober and stay that way has done so through AA. My atheist friends just had a tougher time of it because the founders who wrote up the program were ultra religious.

Even if a drunk thinks the program is complete cornball nonsense, it's where s/he's going to find people who have gotten sober and who are willing to help him/her get through those truly horrible first years of sobriety. It's where s/he will learn about the nature of alcohol addiction.

Yes, it sorely needs an updating of all those hyper religious materials. However, the basic idea of sober alcoholics helping other people get sober is a sound one.

 

JayhawkSD

(3,163 posts)
8. And every person I've seen worshipping God...
Wed Mar 18, 2015, 12:09 PM
Mar 2015

..is an Episcopalian, so it is clear that only Episcopalians worship God. Right? No. It's because I happen to be an Episcopialian and go to an Episcopal church. There are dozens of other types of church in which people worship God, but I have not been in them and cannot, therefor, restify that people actually do worship God in them.

It takes a very limited, or perhaps arrogant, type of mind to think that the only place that something happens is the place in which I have seen it happen.

As it happens, I got sober in AA and have a rather high regard to the organization and the program. I do not, however believe either the 75% or the 8% success rate. I don't know what it is, but I suspect it's not very good; I have seen too many people drop ont in the past 32 years, and too few hang around.

elleng

(130,895 posts)
2. It's most important to understand the disease of alcoholism,
Tue Mar 17, 2015, 07:40 PM
Mar 2015

which AA doesn't teach, but the community in AA does help.

Dr. Milam's book, Under the Influence, a critical part of the treatment in many places, DOES teach that.

Synopsis
Ten of millions Americans suffer from alcoholism, yet most people still wrongly believe that alcoholism is a psychological or moral problem, and that it can be cured by psychotherapy or sheer will power. Based on groundbreaking scientific research, Under The Influence examine the physical factors that set alcoholics and non-alcoholics apart, and suggests a bold, stigma-free way of understanding and treating the alcoholic.

How to tell if someone you know is an alcoholic.

The progressive stages of alcoholism.

How to get an alcoholic into treatment -- and how to choose a treatment program.

Why frequently prescribed drugs can be dangerous -- even fatal -- for alcoholics.

How to ensure a lasting recovery.

http://www.randomhouse.com/book/114310/under-the-influence-by-james-robert-milam-and-katherine-ketcham

elleng

(130,895 posts)
7. So do I disagree.
Wed Mar 18, 2015, 01:34 AM
Mar 2015

AA's not the best way to go for a lot of people, and may or may not have 'conservative' roots, but it and its general approach, community, have helped a lot of people.

I maintain that Dr. Milam's work, (above,) encouraging alcoholics to understand their disease, IS the best way to go, but AA can also be used along with its community approach.

shrike

(3,817 posts)
10. AA came around when there was nothing else
Wed Mar 18, 2015, 03:09 PM
Mar 2015

Alcoholics had nothing, and undoubtedly AA saved a lot of lives. Like the article says, nothing was known about the brain back then. It also acknowledges that Bill W was right: it is a disease, not a moral failing.

Now there are other tools, but there's no reason AA can't continue to be among them.It works for some, not for others. There's no reason to simply dismiss the program just because people have a bone to pick with the religiosity.
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»The Atlantic: The Irrati...