Congress takes another crack at war memorial cross
Source: AP-Excite
By KEVIN FREKING
WASHINGTON (AP) — Could one of the nation's longest-running church-state conflicts be nearing a conclusion?
As part of a bill setting defense policy, Congress would authorize the defense secretary to transfer a scenic parcel of federal land in the La Jolla section of San Diego, to a private group. The parcel contains a memorial to the nation's veterans and a 43-foot-high cross that federal courts have determined is an unconstitutional effort by the government to endorse a religion.
Tens of thousands of people visit Mount Soledad ever year to take in a view that includes the Pacific Ocean to the west, downtown San Diego to the south and the Laguna Mountains to the east. On the same hilltop sits the Mount Soledad Veterans Memorial. The memorial's most dominant feature is a white cross that has been the focus of seemingly unending litigation.
Last year, a federal judge ordered the federal government and Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel to remove the cross. It was the judge's response to a ruling two years earlier from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
FULL story at link.
FILE - In this Jan. 4, 2011 file photo, a man photographs in front of the war memorial cross on Mount Soledad in San Diego. Could one of the nation{2019}s longest-running church-state conflicts be nearing a conclusion? As part of a bill setting defense policy, Congress is set to authorize the secretary of Defense to transfer a scenic parcel of federal land in La Jolla, Calif., to a private group. The parcel contains a memorial to the nation{2019}s veterans and a 43-foot-high cross that federal courts have determined is an unconstitutional effort by the government to endorse a religion. (AP Photo/Gregory Bull, File)
Read more: http://apnews.excite.com/article/20141206/us-cross-dispute-congress-02143add6f.html
= new reply since forum marked as read
Lets put this to a NATIONAL Referendum where the deists, atheists and other forms of religion can have a say and can PLACE our objects of worship right along the cross, since this object is a symbol of having a person nailed to it and how it is a symbol of cruelty to the act of suffering of those who were murdered.
This federal land or parcel is that "WE" all own that land and its not for sale.
This reminds me of the Cliven Bundy issue, he and his band of criminals abscond public land and don't pay grazing fees, have these individuals paid did not pay any taxes or fees for the use of our federal land, or are they going to get a tax exempt status?
Religion is the problem, how many people have died in wars, beliefs by this cross, or by symbols of a any religion.
It is time to debase religion for what it truly is, is a means to use as division to race, ethnicity, culture and lack of respect.
This is ALL of our land and I OBJECT right along with many others, this cross solves none of the others issues in this country or the world---none
.
You may consider this to be trivial in it's appearance because of other "IMPORTANT ISSUES", but this is like putting the so called ten commandants in a court room, or better yet why don't we get a pastor or a minister (never seen a Native American on the dais ) which occurs everyday in the Congress to invoke there religious dogma of piety of blessing that Congress prior to passing legislation to spread hate and fear and attack our fellow humans with laws to hurt---nice concept, to get a blessing and then we get a double standard of hypocrisy, just like the cross being put on our federal land
You may consider this to be trivial in it's appearance because of other "IMPORTANT ISSUES", but this is like putting the so called ten commandants in a court room, or better yet why don't we get a pastor or a minister (never seen a Native American on the dais ) which occurs everyday in the Congress to invoke there religious dogma of piety of blessing that Congress prior to passing legislation to spread hate and fear and attack our fellow humans with laws to hurt---nice concept, to get a blessing and then we get a double standard of hypocrisy, just like the cross being put on our federal land.
Thanks for showing everyone how thin your skin really is when it comes to compassion
Have a nice day
Really stretching there turbinetree, really stretching.
I don't know you, but the lack of indifference to let this go forward shows that the BIGGER issues in this country are not being resolved, and to put this on the proverbial back burner in your equation does not solve the issues at hand, because this issue is a microcosms of the BIGGER social issues confronting this country, it is used to justify death in any form, by a gun, stabbing, nailing to a cross, chocking, war, anything related to death.
This cross represents death and the glorification of death by violence , and I and others are really tired that we have to see this symbol of death and do not want it on our land, in our public debate, public buildings, or any other place it is a reminder and it does not solve the social issues that are BIGGER in this country that you write about.
This cross is being used to placate the acts of violence and its justifications, and if someone cannot see the forest pass the trees because of this cross then they don't see the BIGGER problems in front of there face 
