Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,520 posts)
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 12:59 AM Mar 2014

Missing Malaysia Airlines plane: Flight MH370 could have made a turn back, says Hishammuddin

Source: Straits Times (Singapore)

There was a possibility that the missing Beijing-bound Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 had to make an "air turn back", Malaysia's Acting Transport Minister Hishammuddin Hussein said on Sunday.

He said they were investigating all possible reasons for this around turn including the possibility of terrorism. Malaysia was working with foreign intelligence agencies including the FBI and counter-terrorism units on this.

...snip...

"Our main focus is to find the aircraft. There is a possibility that the plane had to make an air turn back so we have to expand the search area," he said.

Read more: http://www.straitstimes.com/breaking-news/se-asia/story/missing-malaysia-airlines-plane-flight-mh370-could-have-made-turn-back-a



I think this story is going to be very messy for several days.
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Missing Malaysia Airlines plane: Flight MH370 could have made a turn back, says Hishammuddin (Original Post) brooklynite Mar 2014 OP
could it have been hijacked rather than crashed? Voice for Peace Mar 2014 #1
Yes, radar can easily locate a plane like that in mid-air Cali_Democrat Mar 2014 #2
Of all the scenerios... ReRe Mar 2014 #3
If the transponders were off, it should still show up on radar BlueStreak Mar 2014 #4
Spooky considering I've flown over oceans a LOT.... Spitfire of ATJ Mar 2014 #5
+1 tofuandbeer Mar 2014 #6
They don't... Agschmid Mar 2014 #7
Wasn't that much ocean. Spitfire of ATJ Mar 2014 #9
Still that first leg over water traverses a distance wider than California! Agschmid Mar 2014 #10
They were WAY too high for something like a bird strike too. Spitfire of ATJ Mar 2014 #11
Me too davidpdx Mar 2014 #15
Trans-Atantic for me. Think "icebergs". Spitfire of ATJ Mar 2014 #16
Pacific for me davidpdx Mar 2014 #18
Flight paths have changed over the years.... Spitfire of ATJ Mar 2014 #22
I'm thinking... SoapBox Mar 2014 #8
That particular plane laundry_queen Mar 2014 #12
They could even have done the correct repair, and the stress on the metal could cause jtuck004 Mar 2014 #13
I suppose the stress fatigue is possible davidpdx Mar 2014 #17
I thought the 'black box' technology survived crashes. If it or another such device was able to freshwest Mar 2014 #14
The boxes can sink if they're trapped in the hull; you need a ship with the right equipment muriel_volestrangler Mar 2014 #19
When they tell you that your cushion can be used as a floatation device watoos Mar 2014 #20
Speaking of... SoapBox Mar 2014 #21
 

Voice for Peace

(13,141 posts)
1. could it have been hijacked rather than crashed?
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 01:09 AM
Mar 2014

or would it have been possible to locate if it had stayed in the air?

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
2. Yes, radar can easily locate a plane like that in mid-air
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 01:20 AM
Mar 2014

I think there's a very real possibility of a mid-air explosion.

Maybe terrorism.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
3. Of all the scenerios...
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 01:26 AM
Mar 2014

... I hope yours turns out to be correct and that all the of the people are still alive.

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
4. If the transponders were off, it should still show up on radar
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 01:30 AM
Mar 2014

But by the same token, radar should have shown if a turn-around happened. I don't understand why that would be a question at this point. Surely the flight path should have been recorded, especially in an area of such density.

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
5. Spooky considering I've flown over oceans a LOT....
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 01:30 AM
Mar 2014

You just ASSUME these days that search and rescue will know where you went down.

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
10. Still that first leg over water traverses a distance wider than California!
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 02:33 AM
Mar 2014

But valid point much of the flight was over land.

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
8. I'm thinking...
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 01:53 AM
Mar 2014

That if it were terrorism by some kind of organized group, wouldn't they have claimed responsibility by now?

Now "terrorism" by one or two crazy types, be it regular passenger or crew or crew/passenger could be considered.

Are there any recent warnings out from the FAA or Boeing, regarding airframe, engine or computer issues with the 777, that the airlines are supposed to fix (noting here the Airbus 330, exterior air speed indicators) that may have caused a catastrophic failure of the aircraft?

laundry_queen

(8,646 posts)
12. That particular plane
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 03:46 AM
Mar 2014

according to CBC in Canada last night, was involved in a collision with another plane on the tarmac and had enough damage to a wing to ground it for some time. I'm thinking if there was a catastrophic failure, the first place I'd be looking is at that wing to see if there was a shoddy repair or something.

 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
13. They could even have done the correct repair, and the stress on the metal could cause
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 04:23 AM
Mar 2014

fatigue at a rivet point that wouldn't be seen under the skin. A tear there could explain the plane coming apart in mid-air and not being able to radio. One would think with all the x-ray capability that it should be caught, but perhaps not.

A sudden explosion from bad cargo, or an explosive.

Any of the scenarios has to take out the radio too, which is only a few. Nearly everything else they could have tripped or sent a warning of some kind, assuming all their equipment was working.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
17. I suppose the stress fatigue is possible
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 05:35 AM
Mar 2014

the plane has flown for awhile since that accident with the wing. I just can't believe they don't know anything yet. It is very sad.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
14. I thought the 'black box' technology survived crashes. If it or another such device was able to
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 04:26 AM
Mar 2014

transmit a signal, they should have found it quickly. Maybe some military plane could have seen it or a even a spy satellite note its flight. IDK.

IIRC, the black boxes and some other transmitters are not accessible to anyone on board to disable them. I would like to hold out hope that the plane did land safely, but they seem to be guiding us to think the worst.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,311 posts)
19. The boxes can sink if they're trapped in the hull; you need a ship with the right equipment
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 06:06 AM
Mar 2014

to detect it underwater. It took nearly 2 years to find the Air France crash in the Atlantic - a wider area to search, but it shows it's not just a case of using a plane, satellite, or just any ship.

There's no chance the plane landed safely, by now. There's been extensive searching, and rafts with emergency equipment would have been detected.

 

watoos

(7,142 posts)
20. When they tell you that your cushion can be used as a floatation device
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 07:47 AM
Mar 2014

they really mean that your cushion can be used as a locating device.

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
21. Speaking of...
Sun Mar 9, 2014, 11:58 AM
Mar 2014

And now on some aircraft (at least Delta's B737-900s and the refurbished former AirTran/Southwest 717s) the seat bottom cushion CANNOT be used for flotation...at each seat is now a SINGLE chamber (used to always be a dual chamber) life vest.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Missing Malaysia Airlines...