Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 05:45 PM Mar 2012

White House: Afghanistan killings unlikely to alter withdrawal plan

Source: LA Times

By Christi Parsons

A White House official predicted Monday that the weekend shooting of Afghan civilians by an American soldier will not change President Obama’s current plans for withdrawing troops from Afghanistan.

<...>

White House spokesman Jay Carney deplored the killings, but said he doesn't believe it will change plans for withdrawal from the war zone by the end of 2014.

"I don't believe this incident will change the timetable of a strategy that was designed and implemented to allow for the withdrawal of U.S. forces, to allow for the transfer of lead security over to the Afghans," Carney told reporters.


The questions arise as the military launches an investigation into the horrific incident, which left nine children among the dead. Several were slain in their homes.

Read more: http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-white-house-afghanistan-killings-unlikely-to-alter-withdrawal-plan-20120312,0,2688796.story

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
White House: Afghanistan killings unlikely to alter withdrawal plan (Original Post) Cali_Democrat Mar 2012 OP
But it may cause the Afghans to dig their heels in dipsydoodle Mar 2012 #1
I'd have preferred to hear something like, "our wirgdrawal timeframes are under review". nt Old and In the Way Mar 2012 #2
I think that had to be the "official" response. DCBob Mar 2012 #3
I sure hope you are correct.... midnight Mar 2012 #4
I hope I am too. DCBob Mar 2012 #5
What? & leave that Trillion $'s worth of minerals behind? canuckledragger Mar 2012 #6
Not worth it.. DCBob Mar 2012 #7
I know.. canuckledragger Mar 2012 #13
Don't forget the natural gas pipeline. WHEN CRABS ROAR Mar 2012 #9
+1 JBoy Mar 2012 #11
Yeah, right... chervilant Mar 2012 #8
Here we go... RUMMYisFROSTED Mar 2012 #10
War....what is it good for? nt mother earth Mar 2012 #12
it's good for elections, which are supposed to be the only thing that matters MisterP Mar 2012 #14

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
1. But it may cause the Afghans to dig their heels in
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 05:49 PM
Mar 2012

as did the Iraqis on the subject of Americans remaining after the withdrawal falling under Afghan law : not US law.

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
3. I think that had to be the "official" response.
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 05:51 PM
Mar 2012

I suspect behing the scenes they are scrambling to figure out how to get the hell out of there without looking like we are surrending or over-reacting to this incident.

chervilant

(8,267 posts)
8. Yeah, right...
Mon Mar 12, 2012, 06:48 PM
Mar 2012

Let's just leave our troops where retribution will be far easier for the justifiably angry Afghans.

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
14. it's good for elections, which are supposed to be the only thing that matters
Tue Mar 13, 2012, 04:38 PM
Mar 2012

vote for war-supporting candidate A so war-supporting candidate B doesn't get in

such thinking renders massacred 2-year-olds mere props in an electoral drama

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»White House: Afghanistan ...