Obama's task force wants to make unauthorized streaming a felony
Source: Rawstory
The U.S. Department of Commerce wants to crack down on the unauthorized streaming of video and audio content by reviving a provision of the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA).
In a report released last week, the Commerce Departments Internet Policy Task Force called for the unauthorized streaming of copyrighted works to become a felony.
This recommendation was disappointing, Corynne McSherry, the Intellectual Property Director at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, told Raw Story via email. Legacy content industries need to learn, at last, that they dont need new enforcement tools, they need competitive business models. As we learned at last weeks Judiciary Committee hearing, creative people are succeeding in the digital economy despite, not because of, copyright restrictions. New copyright penalties wont lead to more compensation for anyone but lawyers.
Read more: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/08/06/obama-administration-task-force-wants-to-make-unauthorized-streaming-a-felony/
bluedigger
(17,086 posts)We're going to need a lot more prisons!
phantom power
(25,966 posts)Locrian
(4,522 posts)Prison complex AND NSA = win win for BOTH industries!
NSA finds all those downloading 'terrorists' then the prison complex processes them.
another_liberal
(8,821 posts)I'm sure their many lobbyists were involved in both crafting the legislation and securing the votes.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)Garion_55
(1,915 posts)what a disappointment he has been. we need a real progressive in the white house.
liberalmike27
(2,479 posts)Agreed. Such a disappointment.
newfie11
(8,159 posts)Great way to shut down information from getting to the common folks.
Can't have that you know. We must listen only to what big brother allows on the news channels and believe what we are fed.
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)Seems very heavy-handed to change it from a misdemeanor to a felony.
I don't really understand what the industry is going after though. Are they seriously going to charge someone with a felony if a copyrighted song is sung at an event that gets streamed, even if the performance was extemporaneous? Do they charge the singers with the felony, the streamer who didn't know a copyrighted song would be sung until it's too late, or the owner of the equipment to which the event was streamed?
If so there needs to be exceptions for unplanned performances of copyrighted material, especially at public events. Can you imagine a proud parent streaming a kid's birthday party (or even putting it on youtube) and being hit with a felony because a kid at the party was singing or playing a copyrighted song?
newfie11
(8,159 posts)Pretty soon you will need to keep notes to find out what is illegal.
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)If you're producing your own content for a stream, and someone drives by with their radio cranked up so that a piece of Lady Gaga's "Poker Face" ends up in the audio of your stream, YOU ARE NOW A FELON. Yes, it's that broad. It's not just if you intentionally (even if unknowingly) upload copyrighted material. It's even if it is beyond your own control.
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Essentially corporate-written law, used by corporations to enforce their edicts and desires upon the citizenry. This isn't even masked fascism, this is open-air freerange fascism.
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)still walking around and making gazillions every hour. Don't ya just love a "Democratic" president?
newfie11
(8,159 posts)bvar22
(39,909 posts)I know some of these guys, "and they are just savvy businessmen."
"Its the Free Market,
I mean, look at all the Baseball Players."
cascadiance
(19,537 posts)... directly, maybe we could change the priorities of law enforcement to arrest and throw those bastards in prison that really should be there instead!!
If we can't get our government to do the right things ethically, maybe we could throw the crooks' money at the equation?
OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)Torture = policy difference.
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)Maedhros
(10,007 posts)The pro-Obama folks assume that I'm upset with the President because I didn't get the specific sparkly pony I wanted (e.g. Single Payer, etc.).
No, no, no. I'm not angry at the President for what he hasn't done. I'm angry at the President because of all the fucked up things that he has done - offering Social Security as a bargaining chip, appointing Wall Street execs to his cabinet, eliminating habeus corpus, dropping Hellfire missiles on children, etc.
This is just another example.
Skittles
(153,169 posts)we all want Obama to succeed - the difference is, we call him on his bullshit
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)e.g the Trans Pacific Partnership, the "grand bargain" to diminish Social Security, establishment of the surveillance state, criminalization of investigative reporting, et al.
Skittles
(153,169 posts)that shit - well, true Democrats, heck, anyone who CARES needs to call him out on it
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)He's a Chicago Machine Democrat.
Skittles
(153,169 posts)I guess because that is really all we have left now
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)WCLinolVir
(951 posts)I am surprised by how often I feel like he is effing us over. And look at the fine job Rahm has done in Chicago.
think
(11,641 posts)and no longer shared.
Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Seems more of a concession to the inevitable.
Hydra
(14,459 posts)I find more in the realm of freeware and internet artists that I like than corp enterprise. Having no money and nobody around who has the products...I don't miss them.
They're grasping sand. In the end, they'll be holding nothing.
think
(11,641 posts)they still have time to reinvent themselves.....
Harmony Blue
(3,978 posts)is in the beltway bubble.
So out of touch.
MotherPetrie
(3,145 posts)BuelahWitch
(9,083 posts)and keep the private prisons full.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)blackspade
(10,056 posts)TM99
(8,352 posts)because pirates don't stream. They rip and torrent avi's, mp4's, mp3's, mkv's, etc. Streaming is what you do with Netflix. Streaming is sending live video of that protest you are attending. Streaming is what I do when I want to send my ripped and legally owned movies from my computer to my TV in the other room.
No, this is just more authoritarian bullshit designed to control and intimidate. Obama is beyond being a disappointment.
Carolina
(6,960 posts)Streaming is very different than illegal downloads.
jakeXT
(10,575 posts)TM99
(8,352 posts)are aggregates. They link to Youtube and other channels, including major broadcast networks that provide streaming TV online. There is still advertising like regular TV. Are there a few 'pirate networks' in there? Sure, but the majority are not. They just bring it all together so people can watch free shows already provided online.
This will NOT affect real piracy in the least.
Response to jakeXT (Reply #110)
Name removed Message auto-removed
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)forestpath
(3,102 posts)John2
(2,730 posts)made me look even deeper. This was put forth by the Commerce Department and I wanted to look at the Head of the Commerce Deptment, Obama placed in charge.
The head of the Commerce Department is Judy Pritzker, and she is worth over 1.8 Billion dollars. She is Jewish. She lists herself as a Democrat, but she has donated to George W. Bush, Joe Lieberman, Bill Bradley, Rudy Giuliani, John McCain, Al Gore, John Kerry, and Hillary Clinton. She definately has all the bases covered. Romney asked the President something, in a Debate, I found odd. It had something to do with foreign assets, like him? The President never gave an answer to the question, but remarked, it wasn't as big as yours. This country needs a candidate, who is not owned by the wealthy, and think they are superior to every other American. It is all about power and money to these people. Maybe he believes wealth is the driving force behind everything. Even in Foreign Affairs. I'm trying to get into these people's mind and how they see things. For example, I just found out, his Ally in Saudi Arabia offered Putin a lucrative Bribe to drop Syrian President Assad, worth Billions of Dollars, maybe Trillions. We will see if the Russians can be bought?
forestpath
(3,102 posts)of her - the fact that he seems to hold her in such high regard - says it all about Obama's mindset.
alp227
(32,033 posts)And it's Penny Pritzker not Judy.
reflection
(6,286 posts)Read the article at the link and that was the impression I got.
ronnie624
(5,764 posts)[center]*****[/center]
This discrepancy is an increasingly significant impediment, the report continued. Since the most recent updates to the criminal copyright provisions, streaming (both audio and video) has become a significant if not dominant means for consumers to enjoy content online. The lack of potential felony penalties for criminal acts of streaming disincentivizes prosecution and undermines deterrence.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/08/06/obama-administration-task-force-wants-to-make-unauthorized-streaming-a-felony/
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)damnedifIknow
(3,183 posts)Love to know the answer myself.
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)he will go down as the worst Dem president ever.
BlueManFan
(256 posts)but I feel like the biggest fool on the planet falling for Obama's soaring rhetoric about change. My first clue was his capitulation on "Medicare for all." His inauguration was a potential turning point in American history. Now it's just "same shit...different face behind the podium."
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)or I'd re-post my primary testimonial from 2008. when he won the GE that year I was physically disoriented for a few seconds and my wife was sobbing with joy. His presidency has been soul-crushing disappointment.
BlueManFan
(256 posts)in January 2008 and I bet half of them, including me, wept with joy that the long Bush nightmare was finally going to be over. When you say "soul-crushing" disapppointment, with all due respect, even that comes up short!! When you know what you're in for a fight, you can gird your loins and fight on. When the person in whom you place all of your faith betrays you, that's a wound that doesn't heal. It literally kills a part of you. I find myself angrier now, more frustrated, and disullisioned.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)we were sitting on the couch watching msnbc. Olbermann came back from the 10:00 break and the west coast turned blue and I got woozy. My students and university in general (a liberal Catholic institute) were overwhelmingly for Obama. The joy and hope the day after were unbridled. It was a great distraction from the Koch brothers inexorable take over.
BlueManFan
(256 posts)But I still remember how great that day felt. And since it was in the theatre it was on a HUGE screen so you got a real sense of being up close to it. Oh well, I'm over 50 years old. I'm used to disappointment.....sigh.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)I don't know what hurts more, his rw policies or the dissapointment.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)BlueManFan
(256 posts)for all whom? They flirted with "Medicare For All" if you were 50 and over, but otherwise I'm unlcear about whom you mean by "all."
MisterP
(23,730 posts)BlueManFan
(256 posts)I get it. ACA shuttled millions more people into a corrupt, for-profit medical system that makes life and death decisions based on corporate profits. But let me get in line and simply say....."Thanks you sir may I have another?"
Ash_F
(5,861 posts)That's how we can get Dems in office. 2014 is going to be a banner year!
Safetykitten
(5,162 posts)caseymoz
(5,763 posts)He knows what side his bread is buttered on.
president is even worse then George Bush. Bush might have been the worse president as far as his hands off approach to legislating, but Obama is sending the United States into the realm of fascism even worse the imagined.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)tblue
(16,350 posts)But now we are through the looking glass with at least half of us is trying to beat the rest of us into submission.
nolabels
(13,133 posts)Soon as the midget minded morons figure it out how to do it
It's seems to me not so much for the loss to media corporations or the prison complex needing more clients but more for propping up of the prying and spying nanny state. It's a way they can say we were investigating someone for one thing and found a few other things. More of the gutting of the 4th amendment don't ya know, and "Yea, we don't spy" so says an NSA
Agent mike? Ya'll good out there
Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)about detecting "malintent" around the intel community. There has been for a few years now. And the Government uncritically spends a lot of money implementing silly methods to detect "malintent". These methods are always variants of the old and flawed logic that if you don't act like the average person, say at an airport, then you may be hiding some potentially nasty thoughts.
wtmusic
(39,166 posts)I find this focus to be ridiculous.
Stop streaming my phone calls onto a database server, then let's talk.
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)(Put a tiny copyright notice on every text message and email or say it before every phone conversation), so your suggestion actually might have the possibility of being valid. Wouldn't that be justice?
wtmusic
(39,166 posts)so I'm not sure if this is bluster or what the intent of this announcement is.
I like your idea, and in fact the notice is not even necessary for copyright protection. Someone with unlimited funds/time could probably make a court case out of it.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)The streaming I've seen was not very good and if the connections on either end are not good or if it is overloaded it is worthless. I'm curious when they are going to crack down on the other way. It seems like the only thing definitive that they are doing is going after the big websites.
cascadiance
(19,537 posts)Would be a good way to shove those bastards in prison!
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)And those who are creating these rules are?... Lawyers!
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)He's been pushing this shit for years.
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)Say, did you know that one of the four authors of the law that put unverifiable voting machine in place is now the Secretary of Defense, and that the NSA operates under his purview?
Things that make you go, "Hmm..."
BlueManFan
(256 posts)FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)He's America's enemy.
BlueManFan
(256 posts)not much benefit to electing either of those clowns..... Pulling the lever for Obama was the first vote in a long time that I didn't hold my nose to make. Guess I should have taken a whiff of the shit before I got my hopes up.
FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)Fact is, there were no good choices.
BlueManFan
(256 posts)PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)or those dvd/bd to tv's with streaming capabilities will cause problems.
bobclark86
(1,415 posts)it lives in my pants .
Enough about that.
But seriously, shouldn't they worry more about, say, right-wing nutjobs taking over Pennsylvania towns or pretty much any white collar crime?
Skeeter Barnes
(994 posts)the things he really wants to do.
FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)AngryAmish
(25,704 posts)Do we really need that many prison guards?
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)Uhemmm...private prisons with government guarantees of 90% occupancy need filling don't cha know?
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)at least, it helps...
cascadiance
(19,537 posts)PSPS
(13,601 posts)FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)hughee99
(16,113 posts)AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)Real copyright violators, especially those in certain countries(yes, "Communist" China, we're looking straight at you), almost NEVER get tried for their crimes, ever. But somebody sings "Happy Birthday" at a party, and they could be subject to fines, or even jail time.
It's like something out of a bad '90s B-movie.....but played out in real time.
alp227
(32,033 posts)obama2terms
(563 posts)Republicans and democrats alike seem to oppose this, hopefully there's big backlash again like there was last time.
Maven
(10,533 posts)Last edited Wed Aug 7, 2013, 08:50 PM - Edit history (1)
It's the American (Third) Way!
YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)Legacy content industries need to learn, at last, that they dont need new enforcement tools, they need competitive business models.''
babylonsister
(171,070 posts)DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)bowens43
(16,064 posts)this guy is easily the worst Democratic president we have ever had.
babylonsister
(171,070 posts)This IS getting ridiculous.
think
(11,641 posts)I really don;t give a fuck how Obama feels. I care about the results.....
Fearless
(18,421 posts)Because that's what it is. Rental fees for a movie on say Amazon Prime or a similar service run $1-$4 a pop on average. Prison time for that? When the RIAA and MIAA are in charge, yes, that is a reality. Because they over-inflate the value of the item and threaten poor and working class people with draconian fines or prison time.
Welcome to the land of the free.
bunnies
(15,859 posts)Yet he gets ripped to shreds here anyway. *sigh*