Intelligence Chief Apologizes to Senate for 'Erroneous' Statement on NSA Data Collection
Source: Associated Press / Raw Story
@BreakingNews: RT @breakingpol: Intelligence chief apologizes to Senate for 'erroneous' statement on NSA data collection - @AP
Intelligence chief James Clapper apologizes to Congress for erroneous NSA claims
By Dan Roberts, The Guardian
Monday, July 1, 2013 21:31 EDT
The US director of national intelligence, James Clapper, has attempted to head off criticism that he lied to Congress over the extent of government surveillance on American citizens, with a letter to senators in which he apologised for giving erroneous information.
Two weeks after telling NBC news that he gave the least untruthful answer possible at a hearing in March, Clapper wrote to the Senate intelligence committee to correct his response to a question about whether the National Security Agency collected data on millions of Americans.
During the orginal hearing on 12 March, Clapper answered no, sir, to a question by Senator Ron Wyden. It emerged later that Wyden had given him 24 hours notice of the question, and after the session ended, offered him an opportunity to correct it, which was declined.
After disclosures by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden detailing the collection of millions of American phone records, pressure grew on Clapper to clarify his remarks. In an interview with Andrea Mitchell of MSNBC, portions of which were first broadcast on 9 June, after Snowdens leaks first emerged in the Guardian, Clapper explained the apparent inconsistency as a ploy to avoid revealing classified information.
Read more: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/07/01/intelligence-chief-james-clapper-apologizes-to-congress-for-erroneous-nsa-claims
http://bigstory.ap.org/article/dni-chief-apologizes-erroneous-answer-nsa
DNI CHIEF APOLOGIZES FOR 'ERRONEOUS' ANSWER ON NSA
By KIMBERLY DOZIER
Jul. 2 4:56 PM EDT
WASHINGTON (AP) National Intelligence Director James Clapper is apologizing for telling Congress earlier this year that the National Security Agency does not collect data on millions of Americans.
In a letter to Senate Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein, Clapper says his answer was "clearly erroneous."
Leaks by NSA systems analyst Edward Snowden have revealed the NSA's sweeping data collection of U.S. phone records and some Internet traffic every day, though U.S. intelligence officials have said the programs are aimed at targeting foreigners and terrorist suspects overseas.
Clapper was asked in March if the NSA gathered "any type of data at all on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans." He answered that it didn't happen wittingly.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)Erroneous statements my ass.
Was he under oath? If so, isn't that perjury?
reflection
(6,286 posts)That he still has a job today is mind-boggling.
lark
(23,103 posts)That Obama supports him tells us what we need to know.
So true....
24601
(3,962 posts)loss of a federal position.
But that was before 1998. Then the Senate adopted a different standard. If you are not going to hold the highest official in government accountable, it makes no sense to go after those in lower positions.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)Shit like this makes it harder and harder to get up in the morning.
24601
(3,962 posts)term retirement strategy may have a flaw....
alsame
(7,784 posts)The US director of national intelligence, James Clapper, has attempted to head off criticism that he lied to Congress over the extent of government surveillance on American citizens, with a letter to senators in which he apologised for giving erroneous information.
Two weeks after telling NBC news that he gave the least untruthful answer possible at a hearing in March, Clapper wrote to the Senate intelligence committee to correct his response to a question about whether the National Security Agency collected data on millions of Americans.
During the orginal hearing on 12 March, Clapper answered no, sir, to a question by Senator Ron Wyden. It emerged later that Wyden had given him 24 hours notice of the question, and after the session ended, offered him an opportunity to correct it, which was declined.
After disclosures by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden detailing the collection of millions of American phone records, pressure grew on Clapper to clarify his remarks. In an interview with Andrea Mitchell of MSNBC, portions of which were first broadcast on 9 June, after Snowdens leaks first emerged in the Guardian, Clapper explained the apparent inconsistency as a ploy to avoid revealing classified information.
PSPS
(13,600 posts)They (he and the rest of this heinously corrupt government) will just say or do anything to survive this outrage, hoping something, such as this nonsense, "sticks."
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)Why are these A-holes who lie to congress getting a free pass? In the old days, when the Senate and The House members were not so beholden to their Corporate Masters, these people would be impeached. (Clapper, Geithner, Bernanke, etc.)
deurbano
(2,895 posts)Seems that's just for those who expose the lies and reveal the truth...
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)Anyone who attempts to bring him to justice will be vilified a la Snowden.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)collected". He thought Sen Wyden meant "do you personally listen to every phone call." Easy to see where the misunderstanding could happen. Of course Sen Wyden gave him the question prior to the hearing and then asked if he wanted to change his answer after the hearing. Clapper found Ms. Corp-Media-Mitchell more receptive than nasty ole Wyden.
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)SHRED
(28,136 posts)...the corruption of the system will be reinforced.
Lying us into war.
Wall St criminals laughing all the way to the bank...etc...etc...
Festivito
(13,452 posts)I would not tell you before and I will not tell you now.
n2doc
(47,953 posts)So lying to congress is gonna be just fine for him.
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)in allowing Clapper to try to weasel his way out of the fire. She only asked the questions she was told to ask. Clapper inplied that there was a library of data (he didnt say who collected the data) that the NSA could gain access to. Ms. Mitchell didnt ask who collects the data and what kind of data and who has access other than the NSA. Clapper said he misunderstood the work "collected" from Sen Wyden, he thought he meant, "read". Ms. Mitchell just smiled thinking (let's go for martini's after, you buy).
byeya
(2,842 posts)Response to rhett o rick (Reply #13)
RufusTFirefly This message was self-deleted by its author.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Her bosses also just happen to be one of the biggest domestic spy profiteers around. What a coincidence.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)byeya
(2,842 posts)Was it good for you too?
It was Comcastic!!
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)formercia
(18,479 posts)"We don't Spy on US Citizens, our Contractors do."
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Bet a guy could get five stars, if he wanted.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Octafish
(55,745 posts)But no. No need for all that at her trial.
So, after Deborah Jeane Palfrey was convicted and quickly died by a what must surely be suicide, somehow all her records that named a sitting US senator and other government officials disappeared from public review before all the numbers could be run down.
Psephos
(8,032 posts)Joey Liberal
(5,526 posts)As should the heads of the NSA and CIA.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)noticed that too.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)byeya
(2,842 posts)Lonr
(103 posts)when you lie to congress and the American people about illegal activity perpetrated by the NSA
Catherina
(35,568 posts)NoodleyAppendage
(4,619 posts)I guess once you become the overlord of the fascist intelligence state you can get away with lying to Congress with a simple (yet strained) apology. Too bad for the rest of us mere morals that we would not be afforded the same consideration.
J
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)will probably let it slide.
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)So, if Wyden wants to pursue this, all he needs now is for the Senate to concur, right?
Ash_F
(5,861 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
totodeinhere
(13,058 posts)Why hasn't President Obama fired him?
askeptic
(478 posts)We have policies and laws based on lies, (Drug war, anti-abortion, banking laws, foreign aid, torture, indefinite detention, etc. etc. etc.), and it has been the history of our nation.
The thing that'll really get you in trouble is telling the truth!
Romulus Quirinus
(524 posts)nolabels
(13,133 posts)Mostly because it's just another lie in that effort to gain space to be able to tell another. It's cognitive dissonance to think that liars will just all of sudden come to their senses and somehow can now stop trying to deceive others. It's sort of like addiction to a substance, the brain will rely on it for it's crutch because the brain often gets lazy and is a easy shortcut to get from point A to B.
Really if you do accept it you are just another enabler perpetuating the behavior.
MsPithy
(809 posts)Lying to congress is against the law, even if one is not under oath.
How can anyone be confident in the oversight of these spying programs if the overseers are being lied to?
truth2power
(8,219 posts)Being part of the power-elite does have its privileges, don'cha know.
Pardon me while my head explodes.
nolabels
(13,133 posts)Who do you think you could trust more?
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)Actually, when faced with the bald-faced irrefutable evidence that the industrial military complex is smearing shit in their faces, our leaders did nothing. Congress is nothing but fuckin' dipshit coward lickspittle, broken sword, weak-ass nothings.
They are tools.