Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Freddie Stubbs

(29,853 posts)
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 11:10 AM Jun 2013

State Department memo reveals possible cover-ups, halted investigations

Source: CBS News

CBS News has uncovered documents that show the State Department may have covered up allegations of illegal and inappropriate behavior within their ranks.

The Diplomatic Security Service, or the DSS, is the State Department's security force, charged with protecting the secretary of state and U.S. ambassadors overseas and with investigating any cases of misconduct on the part of the 70,000 State Department employees worldwide.

CBS News' John Miller reports that according to an internal State Department Inspector General's memo, several recent investigations were influenced, manipulated, or simply called off. The memo obtained by CBS News cited eight specific examples. Among them: allegations that a State Department security official in Beirut "engaged in sexual assaults" on foreign nationals hired as embassy guards and the charge and that members of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's security detail "engaged prostitutes while on official trips in foreign countries" -- a problem the report says was "endemic."

The memo also reveals details about an "underground drug ring" was operating near the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad and supplied State Department security contractors with drugs.

Read more: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505263_162-57588456/state-department-memo-reveals-possible-cover-ups-halted-investigations

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

dennis4868

(9,774 posts)
3. FORGET ABOUT
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 11:23 AM
Jun 2013

gun control legislation being passed, jobs bill being passed, immigration reform...it's all scandals all the time. Mission accomplished.

Ash_F

(5,861 posts)
4. Let's not forget the Dyncorp(Virginia based) child sex slave trade from Afghanistan
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 11:24 AM
Jun 2013

And years before that, Bosnia. Those investigations were also dropped. Is it a any surprise that mercenaries are bottom feeders?

In America, it is a lot easier and safer to look the other way from the big meanies, then to prosecute them. Cowards.

Ash_F

(5,861 posts)
5. And before DUer get all knee-jerk defensive, please remember
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 11:28 AM
Jun 2013

..that these 'contractors' do not support Dems. Ever.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
14. This is the kind of stuff NSA needs to protect us from
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 05:02 PM
Jun 2013

Every contractor needs to be surveyed, not me, not you, Ash.

This is a sign of the misdirection of the NSA. We are not being protected from the ravages of our hired contractors. If we were, we'd never see reports like this.

cheapdate

(3,811 posts)
6. Since when did "May have been..." become headline news for major news outlets?
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 11:38 AM
Jun 2013

I seem to recall a time when news organizations reported on real events.

 

Android3.14

(5,402 posts)
9. It's been for probably at least a century
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 11:46 AM
Jun 2013

A news organization often must use modifiers such as "alleged" "may have been" and "possible" because details of wrongdoing often change as investigations move forward.
For example, a fire marshal may be investigating a house burning for arson. It may turn out that arson was not the case, so the news organization would probably use the modification of "Fire marshal investigating possible arson".
The fact that they use the language is actually a good sign.

cheapdate

(3,811 posts)
12. Maybe so.
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 01:28 PM
Jun 2013

There's little doubt that the nature of media and journalism is always changing and evolving. There have always been demands on news organizations, but the demand to boost web-traffic is certainly a new element.

The concept of news media as propaganda is a perennial argument that won't be solved here.

I understand the need to inform the public about the workings of government, hell, I want to be informed.

But the constant amplification of every "allegation" is getting frustrating. And this CBS piece seems rushed and unnecessarily slanted.

Maybe I'm wrong, but it seems like investigative journalism used to involve a lot more investigating.

Beacool

(30,250 posts)
7. Oh boy, here we go again!!!
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 11:40 AM
Jun 2013

They'll probably blame Hillary, even if they find out that she was unaware of these investigations.

Although, I'm not surprised that the DSS agents went to hookers. That's the same thing that went on with the Secret Service.

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
15. There was no cover up in the Secret Service case. They were fired.
Sat Jun 15, 2013, 02:31 AM
Jun 2013

It was publicized and then over.

What makes this story a scandal is the cover up.

jimlup

(7,968 posts)
10. It seems to me to be the nature of such organizations to have such scandals
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 11:51 AM
Jun 2013

So will the left now join forces with the right in a populist movement? I don't think it will fly from either side. So same old same old and so it goes...

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»State Department memo rev...