U.S. to Sue Standard & Poor's Over Mortgage Bond Ratings
Source: Reuters
U.S. to sue S&P over mortgage bond ratings
Mon Feb 4, 2013 2:34pm EST
WASHINGTON, Feb 4 (Reuters) - The U.S. Justice Department plans to sue Standard & Poor's over its ratings in 2007 of some mortgage bond deals, the ratings agency said on Monday.
The unit of McGraw-Hill Cos Inc said the lawsuit "would be entirely without factual or legal merit."
Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL1N0B49LR20130204
BadGimp
(4,015 posts)Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)S&P should have been shut down under RICO.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Should be interesting. Whether S&P wins or loses, the discovery and possible trial will tell us a lot about what really happened, and that makes it worthwhile.
Because we will never find out what really happened at the S&P without a legal process.
That goes for the banks too, and it is a crying shame that the Justice Department has gone so easy on those institutions and has not made the results of their investigations known in clear language to the public. We have a right to know. Investors have a right to know what the Justice Department really found in its claimed investigations of the mortgage industry and the banks. We taxpayers paid for the investigations, but the Justice Department has not been open about the details of what they found.
That is just plain wrong.
tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)They saw the Feds moving in and lowered the credit rating of the entire United States so they could claim any bust was a retaliation.
S&P should be shut down for fraud. I don't CARE if it's a household name,...fuck em for being crooks.
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)they can say its "would be entirely without factual or legal merit." If S & P were rating something they didn't understand they were negligent.
SunSeeker
(51,555 posts)JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)That seems to be the entire story. Which is puzzling, to say the least.